Thanks for your voting. I created the PR[1] to backport this feature.
[1] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/4463
Best,
Hang
ZhangJian He 于2024年6月28日周五 08:27写道：
>
> +1, I revisit this pr, it's quite simple and default disabled.
>
> Thanks
> ZhangJian He
> Twitter: shoothzj
> Wechat: shoo
+1, I revisit this pr, it's quite simple and default disabled.
Thanks
ZhangJian He
Twitter: shoothzj
Wechat: shoothzj
On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 12:01 AM Matteo Merli wrote:
>
> Sounds good to me. This won't add any new risk.
> --
> Matteo Merli
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 4:30 PM Hang Chen w
Sounds good to me. This won't add any new risk.
--
Matteo Merli
On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 4:30 PM Hang Chen wrote:
> Hi team,
>
> I would like to discuss the potential backporting of a recently
> introduced feature from the BookKeeper 4.17.0 release to the 4.16.x
> branch, which is used in Pulsa
Hi team,
I would like to discuss the potential backporting of a recently
introduced feature from the BookKeeper 4.17.0 release to the 4.16.x
branch, which is used in Pulsar 3.0 LTS. The feature in question is
the `dbStorage_readAheadCacheBatchBytesSize` configuration option,
added through PR [1].
