. The
clients are really happy with what they have too, and they don’t see any need
to change tech.
Thanks for all the work you guys put in
glenn
-Original Message-
From: Michael Schmalle [mailto:teotigraphix...@gmail.com]
Sent: 12 May 2015 14:46
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: F
rise up and replace the BURM by creating a SWF
> backend for FalconJX. Honestly, I think it could perform even better than
> the BURM for the level of optimizations that are currently done by MXMLC.
>
> -Alex
>
> >
> >
> >
> >-Original Message-
>
X. Honestly, I think it could perform even better than
the BURM for the level of optimizations that are currently done by MXMLC.
-Alex
>
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Michael Schmalle [mailto:teotigraphix...@gmail.com]
>Sent: 12 May 2015 13:28
>To: dev@flex.apache.org
Thanks for the info
:-) if only adobe had given it just one more year ay
-Original Message-
From: Michael Schmalle [mailto:teotigraphix...@gmail.com]
Sent: 12 May 2015 13:28
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: Falcon progress for as flex sdk
I haven't been around for about 2
I haven't been around for about 2 years, just started checking the commits
and things. It seems there really hasn't been any work on the SWF Falcon
compiler since about the time Gordon stopped committing changes to MXML.
I remember I spent a lot of time studying the code, most all classes I
studie
pile-config.xml'.
>
> - Gordon
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Erik de Bruin [mailto:e...@ixsoftware.nl]
> Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2013 5:25 AM
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Falcon progress
>
> Interesting... On my end only 'sparkSWC' fail
t: Saturday, September 28, 2013 5:25 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: Falcon progress
Interesting... On my end only 'sparkSWC' fails. The other tests all pass as
configured (i.e. with -ignore-problems set to cause the tests not to fail on
warnings). I've added @Ignore on &
Interesting... On my end only 'sparkSWC' fails. The other tests all
pass as configured (i.e. with -ignore-problems set to cause the tests
not to fail on warnings). I've added @Ignore on 'sparkSWC' as I agree
all committed tests should either pass or be ignored.
What failures are you seeing on the
On 9/24/13 2:37 PM, "Gordon Smith" wrote:
>
>Has anybody gotten a complete app to compile with Falcon yet? Does it run
>correctly?
I am working with a production Adobe application code base. It compiled
and generated a 20MB uncompressed SWF but it still doesn't run. Hopefully
soon...
I see now that the workaround I mentioned was marked with FIXME in the source
code, so that makes it trackable.
- Gordon
From: Gordon Smith
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 2:38 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Falcon progress
Congratulations on getting more SWCs to compile with Falcon! It
; From: Gordon Smith [mailto:gosm...@adobe.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 4:33 PM
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Falcon progress
>
> Fixed a missing newline that made the generate code hard to understand...
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Gordon Smith [m
Something's screwy. After fixing and resending it still looks bad. The final
instruction is "setproperty p".
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Smith [mailto:gosm...@adobe.com]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 4:33 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: Falcon pr
Fixed a missing newline that made the generate code hard to understand...
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Smith [mailto:gosm...@adobe.com]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 4:28 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Falcon progress
Today I added MXML parser unit tests for MXMLPropertySpecifie
13 matches
Mail list logo
