Erik, Jason and Viet. This is really good. Since we're making a
SNAPSHOT available is there some point where we should declare a 1.0 ?
On Aug 23, 2007, at 4:30 PM, Erik B. Craig wrote:
All,
After the recent round of changes and improvements around j2g
(usable from within the Eclipse IDE
I wanted to see how much Jason really really luvs Windows. So I
began trying GShell on that OS :-)
First, I was surprised it even had batch files to support Windows
users. Thanx Jason. You really have gone out of your way :-)... Just
kidding !
gsh.bat had a small typo. svn commit: r570296 fix
Uncle
On Aug 27, 2007, at 9:10 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Oh, this is fun...
--jason
Begin forwarded message:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Cron Daemon)
Date: August 27, 2007 6:06:52 PM PDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /home/jdillon/ws/site/bin/sync
chmod: /www/geronimo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12523146
]
lucols commented on GERONIMO-3438:
--
any one can help?
> context-root error
> --
>
>
How do the users of geronimo set log levels?
On 8/27/07, David Blevins (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Verify log levels can be changed for openejb related log categories
> ---
>
> Key: GERONIMO-3445
>
Verify log levels can be changed for openejb related log categories
---
Key: GERONIMO-3445
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3445
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12523124
]
David Blevins commented on GERONIMO-3423:
-
Fixed in 2.1 trunk.
> Ensure that users can change the ejb jn
I've refactored a few things in the api and introduced back the
listeners and flows.
For those who prefer to read javadoc, take a look at:
http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/servicemix-4.0/site/apidocs/
The javadoc is quite low on comments right now, so if any area
appears to be unclear,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy updated GERONIMO-2964:
--
Attachment: GERONIMO-2964-combined.patch
GERONIMO-2964-combined.patch: This
I would highly recommend switching to slf4j for internal logging, and then
use the slf4j over jcl facade to permanently get rid of commons-logging. If
you are going to use OSGi in the future, you will have trouble with the
dynamic classloading issue introduced by JCL. The slf4j facade will
allevi
No...that made much more sense to me ;-)
I think convenience is the way to go. I am following you now.
Thanks,
Jeff
David Jencks wrote:
>
> On Aug 27, 2007, at 11:26 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
>
>> David,
>>
>> So perhaps I am missing something and you could help clarify this. You
>> say "It'
On Aug 27, 2007, at 11:26 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
David,
So perhaps I am missing something and you could help clarify this.
You
say "It's by no means obvious to me that treating this as a problem
with
the coding of our classloaders is appropriate." Yet in your 1, 2,
and 3
options, yo
EJBContext
--
Key: GERONIMO-3444
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3444
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: OpenEJB
Affects Versions: 2.0.x
On Aug 27, 2007, at 2:16 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Aug 27, 2007, at 9:06 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Kevan Miller wrote:
Cool down a minute and think about this. What happens in tomcat if
you want to use cxf + an incompatible version of spring in your
app? You bundle cxf + spring
I would say the opposite. The OSGi classloaders are much more
powerful and you can more easily control the visibility of classes.
In addition, if JCL is required by a given bundle A, it does not
mean that it will be visible by a bundle using bundle A.
Obviously, this means to be tested (or maybe
On Aug 27, 2007, at 2:44 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Or something like that
http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=46658
I've responded to both reports of a problem. Neither were a problem
that I've seen before (or a search of our dev/user/jira lists). If
somebody thinks
On 8/27/07, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aren't we supposed to prevent ejbs from starting threads? Does the
> commonj thread pool have a facility for supplying the security
> context from the request submitting thread to the worker thread?
Absolutely we are. I'm not sure about commo
On 8/25/07, Anita Kulshreshtha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>What do others feel?
Exclude'em.
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
Or something like that
http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=46658
-David
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacek Laskowski closed GERONIMODEVTOOLS-141.
Resolution: Fixed (was: Won't Fix)
As per user's request.
> Ins
David,
So perhaps I am missing something and you could help clarify this. You
say "It's by no means obvious to me that treating this as a problem with
the coding of our classloaders is appropriate." Yet in your 1, 2, and 3
options, you seem to be saying its basically a problem with
classloading.
Jason Dillon wrote:
> So, is this something that I should pursue? I've seen a few positive
> comments on this functionality, nothing negative...
>
> Should I invest more time in making this feature complete and set it up
> as the default system for launching the server?
Yes!
>
> --jason
>
On Aug 27, 2007, at 9:06 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Kevan Miller wrote:
K. Can you explain to me what functionality is being taken away? Dan
said function would be lost, but then listed functionality and
said that
configuring them "becomes quite a bit harder". Nor do I know how this
increas
So, is this something that I should pursue? I've seen a few positive
comments on this functionality, nothing negative...
Should I invest more time in making this feature complete and set it
up as the default system for launching the server?
--jason
On Aug 21, 2007, at 3:05 PM, Jeff Genen
On Aug 23, 2007, at 8:40 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
Jason,
I finally got around to looking at this. It's really cool!
:-)
This is a great way to address the environment and java opt issues
in a more dynamic way to plugins to potentially exploit.
In addition to some of the items David mentioned
On 8/27/07, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > 1. Use slf4j as the logging framework. (http://www.slf4j.org/) -> btw,
> > > I'm not sure if its a better option, but I did hear some good stuff
> > > about it.
> >
> > Yes, SMX should switch to using the slf4j-api which will allow any
>
I've CC:ed you. However, I'd prefer that you respond to the dev list,
only (or cc: me, not reply directly). My mail rules for email
addressed directly to me puts mail in my personal folder. I monitor
Geronimo mail more frequently than personal mail... ;-) Perhaps I
need to tweak my rules a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3254?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shiva Kumar H R reassigned GERONIMO-3254:
-
Assignee: Shiva Kumar H R
> Admin Console Wizard to auto generate geronimo-web
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3254?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy updated GERONIMO-3254:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0.x)
2.1
Changed fix version t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12523037
]
Aman Nanner commented on GERONIMO-2964:
---
I have verified that the GERONIMO-2964.patch does indeed fix our is
Kevan Miller wrote:
> K. Can you explain to me what functionality is being taken away? Dan
> said function would be lost, but then listed functionality and said that
> configuring them "becomes quite a bit harder". Nor do I know how this
> increased complexity would be who bears the burden for th
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1029?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_40015
]
Will Franco commented on SM-1029:
-
thanks
> Bug in HTTP BC when configuring managed keystore for SSL
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy updated GERONIMO-2964:
--
Attachment: g2964.war
Verified that GERONIMO-2964.patch solves the problem.
On Aug 27, 2007, at 10:11 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Aug 25, 2007, at 5:44 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
From my standpoint, it would be greatly preferred if you could
find a way
to leave spring for CXF. There is definitely a lot of
functionality
that would be lost if
I like it. I just glanced through it real quick but I think it might be
prudent to mention what versions of geronimo the tool is for on the
downloads page. I'm sure it's on the migration tool page already, but I
don't think it would hurt to reiterate that early on.
Thanks,
-Jason Warner
On 8/2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy updated GERONIMO-2964:
--
Attachment: GERONIMO-2964.patch
Aman, can you check if GERONIMO-2964.patch a
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1029?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Krasser updated SM-1029:
---
Attachment: ServiceMixSslSocketConnector.patch
I had the same problem with the consumer endpoint. At
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aman Nanner updated GERONIMO-3208:
--
Attachment: nestedjarfile.patch
Here is a patch that I use to get around this problem. I'm
I do believe that the devtools subproject is indeed the best place for it
given it's purpose and functionality, that said, here are some proposed
changes to the devtools subproject page.
Add a section identical to the existing 'Eclipse Plug-in' that contains the
following:
Paul,
I agree that an integration of the JMX view and the work we are doing is
something we should be doing (and are now planning on), as well as moving
towards using JSR77 as Anita has also mentioned. As far as the 'big picture'
with what we're working on goes, I believe the best approach would b
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12523021
]
Joe Bohn commented on GERONIMO-3401:
{quote}
Agreed. These two cases could be handled separately or we could
Kevan,
On Monday 27 August 2007, Kevan Miller wrote:
> On Aug 25, 2007, at 5:44 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> > From my standpoint, it would be greatly preferred if you could find
> > a way
> > to leave spring for CXF. There is definitely a lot of
> > functionality that would be lost if spring is no
Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Aug 25, 2007, at 5:44 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
>>
>> From my standpoint, it would be greatly preferred if you could find a way
>> to leave spring for CXF. There is definitely a lot of functionality
>> that would be lost if spring is not available. In particular, if
Build fails in Java 6: Cannot find symbol StandardMBean(Object, Class)
-
Key: SM-1042
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1042
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Ty
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods closed GERONIMO-3240.
--
Resolution: Duplicate
Fix Version/s: 2.1
2.0.x
GERONIMO-3380 docum
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12523009
]
Paul McMahan commented on GERONIMO-3401:
{quote}
However, I think the real issue there is that in a restar
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12523007
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-2964:
---
Paul, Donald,
I don't think it is necessary to cha
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12523005
]
Joe Bohn commented on GERONIMO-3401:
Uninstall breaks the server on those components listed regardless of it b
On Aug 25, 2007, at 5:44 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
From my standpoint, it would be greatly preferred if you could find
a way
to leave spring for CXF. There is definitely a lot of functionality
that would be lost if spring is not available. In particular, if a
user
want to configure vario
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12522996
]
Paul McMahan commented on GERONIMO-2964:
Donald, that is right, and when combined with the schema change t
+1
- Original Message
From: Daryl Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 7:34:08 AM
Subject: Re: IRC sessions on ServiceMix 4.0 design (was Re: ServiceMix 4.0)
On Aug 25, 2007, at 2:12 AM, Nodet Guillaume wrote:
> Ok, sounds like we have enough
When I am building G 2.0.1, I am noticing a
geronimo-txmanager-parent-2.0.1.jar. But I do not see a
geronimo-txmanager-parent-2.0.1 tag under
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/tags. Should
there be one?
Vamsi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1602?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12522986
]
Karsten Voges commented on GERONIMO-1602:
-
Sorry for not replying earlier. I have switched companies, so I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Karsten Voges updated GERONIMO-3443:
Attachment: 0.0.0.0_access_log.2007-08-27.txt
geronimo.log
See attached
Error in Tomcat-Version: Webfront + Admin console stopped working
-
Key: GERONIMO-3443
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3443
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
On Aug 26, 2007, at 11:05 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
New threads launched from an EJB context do not run as the same
Subject as the thread that launched it. This causes a failure when
this new thread calls an EJB with restricted method permissions.
Looks like JBoss and BEA Weblogic c
56 matches
Mail list logo
