On Jul 22, 2011, at 10:45 PM, Ivan wrote:
> Suppose you mean the OSGi cache directory ? On the server runtime, the size
> of this directory should be almost have the same size with the repository
> folder, as all the files would be copied.
Right. I'm not worried about relatively static content
A while back we had a problem with files for undeployed applications were
building up in a servers repository. This problem was fixed. We still, however,
have files that will build up in var/cache until the server is restarted. I ran
a deploy/undeploy test of a simple HelloWorld jsp app. Each de
With a Geronimo build from this morning, we're passing all JCDI TCK tests.
There were two problematic session tests that fail in a full run, but pass when
run in isolation. So, something left to investigate/fix, but technically we're
passing the JCDI TCK.
This is fantastic. It's been a lot of
On Jul 21, 2011, at 6:31 AM, Yi Xiao wrote:
> First, I think if the monitoring function does not effect the server's
> runtime performance, we could start it automatically.
> Otherwise, maybe we could give some options, also including the risk tips
> when the user enable query on the server, s
On Jul 20, 2011, at 11:24 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
> Looks great Shawn. Thanks!
>
> I checked signature/checksum, license/notice files, source (rat), and build
> -- all looked good.
Just to make it official, here's my '+1'... ;-)
--kevan
>
> --kevan
>
&
Looks good to me.
Checksums/signatures, source, license/notice, build -- all look good to me.
Assuming tck looks good, here's my +1
--kevan
On Jul 20, 2011, at 10:21 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
> If we are voting
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/org/apa
Looks great Shawn. Thanks!
I checked signature/checksum, license/notice files, source (rat), and build --
all looked good.
--kevan
On Jul 19, 2011, at 10:21 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
> This is a single vote for releasing 3 new Geronimo bundles that are OSGi
> versions of other jar files. Thanks
On Jul 20, 2011, at 4:39 PM, Jaggi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm a newbie to Geronimo. I'm trying to Installing Axis2 in Geronimo. When I
> deploy axis2.war via the Geronimo console with the deployment
> plan(attached), I get the java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
> org/apache/commons/io/FileUtils. The comp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6086?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13068321#comment-13068321
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-6086:
I was thinking that partic
: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Fix For: 3.0
In some cases a startup error will prevent the server from starting. Yet the
only message the user sees is "Main not found" (or no message at all).
I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6086?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13068092#comment-13068092
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-6086:
I guess that's not qu
Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Reporter: Kevan Miller
The geronimo commands are currently configuring GERONIMO_TMPDIR=var/temp. Since
the current directory is the bin directory, that means our temp files end up in
$GERONIMO_HOME/bin/tmp -- which is certainly
(Regular issues)
Components: commands
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Fix For: 3.0
We should stop setting the java.ext.dirs property. We don't include lib/ext any
longer. So, there's no reason to be configuring it differently from the default
value the JRE/JDK wil
On Jul 18, 2011, at 11:20 PM, chi runhua wrote:
> Kevan, I just did a quick review and please find my comments inline.
Thanks!
>
> Jeff
>
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
> All,
> If anyone's willing to lend a hand on meeting our projec
Looks like a post-1147728 commit is causing a server problem. The CI tests are
failing, because the server won't start --
http://ci.apache.org/builders/geronimo-server-trunk-tomcat/builds/73
--kevan
All,
If anyone's willing to lend a hand on meeting our project branding requirements
-- help would be much appreciated. It's the PMCs responsibility to insure the
requirements are met. But anyone (contributor/committer/pmc member) can help us
meet the requirements. As a reminder --
http://www.a
Hi Shawn,
Nice work.
There's been an update on how to handle dual-licensed artifacts (or an update
on my understand of how to handle them...). See --
http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#mutually-exclusive
Based on this, we should not be including the GPL license in our license file.
So
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6055?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13067029#comment-13067029
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-6055:
The fix for https://bugs.eclipse
Hi Jacek,
Thanks for doing this.
Looks nearly perfect to me. Here's my +1.
The date in the NOTICE file is 2003-2010. That should be 2011. This is not a
hard requirement. So, I would not re-spin a release, just for this reason.
Source, license/notice files (except for the date), build, signatu
On Jul 18, 2011, at 5:36 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Jacek Laskowski
> wrote:
>
>> It's been a while since I was more active wrt Geronimo and there's a
>> chance to change it - I may run the release process if no one objects.
>>
>> I've already discussed the
On Jul 17, 2011, at 9:53 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
> Kevan,
>
> What I'm talking about is the specs and re-bundle packages instead of all
> remaining snapshots. I think these packages other than specs/re-bundles
> have been tracked by JIRAs opened by David.B.
Understood. I knew I was giving y
On Jul 17, 2011, at 9:21 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
> I'm going to release these spec and bundle SNAPSHOTS used in geronimo 3.0.
> I just searched and find following list.
>
>
> Specs snapshot in use:
>
> • geronimo-osgi-support
> • geronimo-jaxws_2.2_spec
> • geronimo-jaxb_2.
On Jul 16, 2011, at 6:43 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
> Vote passed with
>
> three +1 : Shawn Jiang, Forrest Xia, Ivan
> one +0 : Kevan Miller
> no -1
>
> Thanks everyone for the vote, I will push the staging artifacts to central
> soon.
This is a perfectly valid
On Jul 15, 2011, at 9:15 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
> , OK, then I'll rename all LICENSE.txt, NOTICE.txt back for all
> remaining specs/bundles.
I think I got them all...
--kevan
Here's my +1. Thanks Forrest!
Signature/checksums looked good. Source, license/notice, and build all looked
good.
--kevan
On Jul 15, 2011, at 9:16 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
> [VOTE] release YOKO 1.2 - 2nd attempt.
>
> This is a bug fixes release for Java EE 6 compliance:
>
> The fixes in this re
On Jul 13, 2011, at 12:29 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
> Looks good with one exception.
>
> geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.1/NOTICE.txt contains:
>
> Copyright 2003-2006 The Apache Software Foundation
>
>
On Jul 15, 2011, at 12:25 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
> And probably most relevant to the task at hand:
>
> http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs
We have some low-hanging fruit, here. Can definitely have some of these
requirements resolved for our report. It's ok to have some
And probably most relevant to the task at hand:
http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs
--kevan
On Jul 15, 2011, at 11:45 AM, Russell E Glaue wrote:
> If we value documentation as much as we value code, then how about this
> modification?
Great. Thanks!
It wasn't actually my intent to include that diversity statement. That was a
one time statement from a past report, motivated by externa
Background information on our branding requirements:
http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/responsibility.html
--kevan
Our board report is due next week. I've added a template to our Wiki --
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2011-07+-+July
Will plan on updating during the next few days. Contributions welcome!
--kevan
On Jul 15, 2011, at 10:03 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>> And note that due to a bug in the JDK you really need to use
>>
>> /dev/./urandom
>>
>> or
>>
>> /dev//urandom
>>
>> and not
>>
>> /dev/urandom.
>>
>> Oracle themselves already internally use "dev/urandom, but later they
>> switch from /
On Jul 15, 2011, at 2:48 AM, pif wrote:
> Is the JIRA Release Date: 30/Nov/11 for geronimo 3.0.1 still valid?
Hi Frank,
I'm not sure where that date came from/who set it. We traditionally don't
target dates for a release. We're still finalizing a 3.0 release... So, that
may be a reasonable dat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5729?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller updated GERONIMO-5729:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.0)
3.0.1
> Access the wrong web cons
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5729?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller updated GERONIMO-5729:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.0.1)
3.0
> Access the wrong web cons
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13065683#comment-13065683
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-6077:
Right. Which is really what I m
From time to time I encounter a problem starting a Geronimo server on a Linux
system (I've always seen it on Ubuntu -- but the problem could exist on other
distributions). The server start seems to hang. However, if you're patient,
which I rarely am, the server will eventually start. If you're i
: public (Regular issues)
Reporter: Kevan Miller
The usage information:
{code}
Hit '' for a list of available commands
and '[cmd] --help' for help on a specific command.
Hit '' or 'osgi:shutdown' to shutdown Geronimo.
{code}
Would be better disp
On Jul 13, 2011, at 10:34 AM, Ivan wrote:
> I just merged almost all the changes from Tomcat trunk to our Tomcat ext
> 7.0.18 code base. Some detailed information could be found in the readme.txt
> file. And Tomcat community is preparing for Tomcat 7.0.19, since that our
> 7.0.18 almost has th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-762?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13064532#comment-13064532
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-762:
---
Janet,
We n
Same about the year in the NOTICE file. So, would like to see that updated.
The source, signatures/checksums, LICENSE/NOTICE file looks good. I'm running a
build, now. Will let you know if I see any problems. I keep building while a
Geronimo server is running. IIRC, the server interferes with th
On Jul 13, 2011, at 12:29 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
> Looks good with one exception.
>
> geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.1/NOTICE.txt contains:
>
> Copyright 2003-2006 The Apache Software Foundation
>
>
Looks good with one exception.
geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.1/NOTICE.txt contains:
Copyright 2003-2006 The Apache Software Foundation
Not a hard requirement, but by our convention the latter date should be 2011.
Also, most of our LICENSE/NOTICE files no longer have the .txt suffix. Neither
of
On Jul 12, 2011, at 12:31 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I think we come to a point to determine whether to release YOKO 1.2 for G 3.0
> release.
>
> Since rest of YOKO related tck failures are due to RI' problem we think, I
> would think we could release YOKO 1.2 now.
>
> If any obje
On Jul 12, 2011, at 1:23 AM, David Jencks wrote:
> The build works for me anyone else seeing problems?
>
Builds fine for me, also.
--kevan
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6055?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13063447#comment-13063447
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-6055:
Some of the data from the
On Jul 10, 2011, at 3:20 PM, Andreas Veithen wrote:
> Ivan,
>
> I have an entire list of changes that I want to include in 1.6.1 and
> that I need to merge from the trunk. I will include the changes
> relevant for Geronimo as well.
Great! Thanks Andreas!
--kevan
On Jul 10, 2011, at 1:03 PM, Rex Wang wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> I think it's time to change.
> Geronimo 3.0 will be a great milestone that brings a lot of new features. So
> how about also provide our user a brand new UI design of the admin console?
>
> I opened a Jira: https://issues.apache.org/j
On Jul 10, 2011, at 10:14 AM, Ivan wrote:
> Seems that there are some issues with 7.0.18, and Tomcat community is
> preparing for 7.0.19.
So I see... I read the tomcat list last night, not this morning ;-)
It would be a good idea to pull in an early version and identify any
integration or
On Jul 8, 2011, at 11:30 AM, Ivan wrote:
> Hi, Tomcat community is voting for 7.0.18, and I am planning to pull the tag
> once the vote is passed. And I hope that this version will be the one shipped
> with Geronimo 3.0 if everything is fine with the TCK.
> Suppose no one is working on the Tomc
On Jul 8, 2011, at 4:12 AM, Charles Moulliard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As a Apache Camel, ServiceMix and Karaf committer, I have different
> questions that I would like to discuss with Geronimo team.
>
> 1) Karaf
> - Geronimo platform is based and uses Apache Karaf Project (versin 1.x). Is
> it planned
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6055?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller updated GERONIMO-6055:
---
Attachment: OpenWebBeansCallStack.png
BeanValidationCallStack.png
Meant
: 3.0
Reporter: Kevan Miller
3.0 server startup has gotten kind of slow. Time to see if we can boost it, a
bit.
I've made some measurements of server startup time using YourKit Java Profiler
(which I think is a great memory and performance analysis tool). If anybody is
tryi
On Jul 2, 2011, at 4:13 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
> I noticed that there are no extensions for all sh scripts of geornimo.
> Does anyone know what's the background of this ?
>
>
> GERONIMO_HOME\bin\client
> GERONIMO_HOME\bin\deploy
> GERONIMO_HOME\bin\geronimo
> GERONIMO_HOME\bin\register-servic
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller resolved GERONIMO-6039.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.0
Error that I was seeing was:
error: Could
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller reassigned GERONIMO-6039:
--
Assignee: Kevan Miller
> testInjectionIntoWebServiceEndpoint(org.jboss.jsr
Even though I recently posted the first notice, it's worth repeating. This is a
great program.
--kevan
Begin forwarded message:
> From: "Gavin McDonald"
> Date: July 2, 2011 8:16:14 PM EDT
> To:
> Subject: Reminder: TAC Assistance to ApacheCon NA 2011 closes July 8th
> Reply-To: priv...@incu
I'm behind on my community@ email, I guess...
FYI.
Begin forwarded message:
> From: "Gavin McDonald"
> Date: June 6, 2011 4:01:40 AM EDT
> To:
> Subject: Travel Assistance applications now open for ApacheCon NA 2011
> Reply-To: commun...@apache.org
> Reply-To:
>
> The Apache Software Founda
On Jun 29, 2011, at 1:27 AM, Yi Xiao wrote:
> Is there a snapshot repository that the users or developers could get the the
> devtools' nightly build?
>
> I just found the site:
> http://ci.apache.org/builders/geronimo-devtools-eclipse-trunk/ provides some
> of the devtools' build info, and
On Jun 23, 2011, at 11:23 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
> Btw, I turned off these builds for trunk as trunk is now built via
> Buildbot. Once the same is setup for 2.2 and/or 2.1 branch (with
> testsuites) I will turn off the automatic builds for those branches as
> well.
I think you can turn off the 2
On Jun 27, 2011, at 4:37 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
> Just triggered another tck execution, keep tuned...
Thanks Forrest.
We may want to rerun some of the tests once
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-690 is fixed. Can discuss specifics
on TCK list. I've tested the patch on the Jira and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6021?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller resolved GERONIMO-6021.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.0
2.2.2
Use UTF-8 encoding
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6021?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller reassigned GERONIMO-6021:
--
Assignee: Kevan Miller
> International characters in groupId/artifactId na
: public (Regular issues)
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Running with the java property '-Dfile.encoding=UTF8' looks like it's possible
to support bean names with international characters. However, if you specify a
moduleId with international characters, you can run into problem
On Jun 23, 2011, at 3:05 PM, Gary Shin wrote:
> Hi,
> I am building Geronimo 3 from source. I want to restrict the G3 maven
> build to only generate assembly of one type say
> "geronimo-tomcat7-javaee-web". So how can i do that, is there any
> configuration file available.
Shawn recently
On Jun 22, 2011, at 10:05 AM, Rex Wang wrote:
> Hi Geronimo and OpenEJB devs,
>
> I am fixing the servlet tck problems. And it requires to validate the
> standard Deployment Descriptors xml files before deployment.
> Now we use the org.apache.openejb.jee.JaxbJavaee to do the unmarshal, for
>
On Jun 22, 2011, at 1:27 PM, Russell E Glaue wrote:
> On 06/22/2011 12:02 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>>
>> On Jun 22, 2011, at 12:09 PM, Russell E Glaue wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I am using a very basic build procedure.
>>> 1. checkout G3 trunk
>>
On Jun 22, 2011, at 12:09 PM, Russell E Glaue wrote:
> I am wanting to update the G3 dev wiki to help first-time builders get
> started.
> How would you suggest a build of G3 could become faster?
>
> The only tip I am aware of for speeding up trunk (G3) builds is to install a
> maven repository
On Jun 22, 2011, at 1:30 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
> We rebuild dojo locally to only include the dojo components geronimo console
> needs. It's a popular method to use dojo. It will reduce server size,
> startup time,and page loading time. I don't know if we have any problem to
> apply the pa
On Jun 21, 2011, at 10:21 AM, Russell E Glaue wrote:
>
>
> On 06/21/2011 08:55 AM, Russell E Glaue wrote:
>> On 06/20/2011 04:37 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jun 20, 2011, at 5:18 PM, Gary Shin wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Kevan,
>>>
On Jun 21, 2011, at 3:22 AM, genspr...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: genspring
> Date: Tue Jun 21 07:22:59 2011
> New Revision: 1137888
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1137888&view=rev
> Log:
> GERONIMO-6016 Geronimo can't handle well when modules in ear has the same
> name.
Hi Shawn,
On Jun 21, 2011, at 3:42 AM, rwo...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: rwonly
> Date: Tue Jun 21 07:42:48 2011
> New Revision: 1137893
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1137893&view=rev
> Log:
> GERONIMO-5764 Support Bundles Deployment
I'm getting the following error (as is buildbot --
http:
On Jun 21, 2011, at 3:42 AM, rwo...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: rwonly
> Date: Tue Jun 21 07:42:48 2011
> New Revision: 1137893
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1137893&view=rev
> Log:
> GERONIMO-5764 Support Bundles Deployment
Hi Rex,
Please make sure all new files contain Apache sour
On Jun 20, 2011, at 5:18 PM, Gary Shin wrote:
> Hi Kevan,
> Your suggestion worked. Build successful by changing Program Files to
> Progra~1. So is it a bug that needs to be filed in JIRA?
IMO, yes.
--kevan
On Jun 20, 2011, at 2:32 PM, Gary Shin wrote:
> Hi,
> The system configurations are given below
>
> Trunk checked out at revision: 1137722
>
> java version "1.6.0_25"
> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_25-b06)
> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 20.0-b11, mixed mode)
>
>
On Jun 20, 2011, at 1:44 PM, Russell E Glaue wrote:
> That is what I assumed.
> But the build documentation suggests otherwise:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDEV/Building+Apache+Geronimo
> "You will need a JDK 5.0+ (J2SE 1.5.0+) ... Java 6 works with trunk and 2.2.
> Earlie
The current M2 branch is not being used and is causing some confusion. I plan
on deleting soon (Monday/Tuesday), unless I hear some objections.
--kevan
On Jun 18, 2011, at 4:01 PM, Russell E. Glaue wrote:
> Can you provide some more information about your build environment?
>
> Java version (output from `java --version`)
> Maven version (output from `mvn --version`)
> Geronimo trunk revision/info you are attempting to build (output from `svn
>
A build should find uddi-ws, now. Help me to remember to revert these changes,
when there's a juddi release...
1136657 and 1136664
--kevan
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13050699#comment-13050699
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-5966:
I don't understand comple
On Jun 16, 2011, at 10:12 AM, Russell E Glaue wrote:
> On 06/13/2011 01:24 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>>
>> On Jun 13, 2011, at 2:15 PM, Forrest Xia wrote:
>>
>>> Simply waiting for uddi guys to push 3.1.0-snapshot out to apache snapshot
>>> repo seems not
On Jun 13, 2011, at 2:15 PM, Forrest Xia wrote:
> Simply waiting for uddi guys to push 3.1.0-snapshot out to apache snapshot
> repo seems not work, cause juddi guys pushed one 3.1.0-snapshot there
> already, just they add a classifier "jaxws21" into the artifact jar file name.
>
> You can see
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047359#comment-13047359
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-5997:
Right. And the 'geronimo.sh
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046952#comment-13046952
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-6002:
With these changes, can now over
gular issues)
Components: Tomcat
Affects Versions: 3.0
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Assignee: Kevan Miller
Fix For: 3.0
It's not currently possible to configure the defaultJspServlet properties. This
means that you can't configure '
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046946#comment-13046946
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-5997:
Hi Leonardo, thanks for the info
On Jun 1, 2011, at 5:22 PM, David Jencks wrote:
> But first please explain why you think this change is correct. It looks
> wrong to me, and I think the test was correct. Maybe i don't understand what
> the test is doing, but I don't think "libfolder/" is in the "manifest
> classpath" being
On Jun 9, 2011, at 2:21 AM, David Blevins wrote:
>
> On Jun 8, 2011, at 9:36 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
>> I and pretty much everyone with dual OpenEJB/Geronimo commit is likely way
>> too busy to commit this patch (XBEAN-176).
>
> Ended up having to make CDI related change to xbean and clear
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046194#comment-13046194
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-5997:
OK. I don't know w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13045530#comment-13045530
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-5997:
What documentation are you refer
All,
If you're interested in attending ApacheCon and could use some travel
assistance to help get you there, this is a great program.
--kevan
On Jun 6, 2011, at 4:03 AM, Gavin McDonald wrote:
>
> The Apache Software Foundation (ASF)'s Travel Assistance Committee (TAC) is
> now accepting applica
On Jun 5, 2011, at 2:21 AM, genspr...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: genspring
> Date: Sun Jun 5 06:21:46 2011
> New Revision: 1131922
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1131922&view=rev
> Log:
> move schema conversion "openejb-jar" from SchemaConversoinUtils to
> jetty/tomcat builders.
I
On Jun 4, 2011, at 4:00 AM, David Jencks wrote:
>
> On Jun 4, 2011, at 12:03 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
>> I took a look to see if "no re-deployment when only JSP files are updated"
>> option on the 3.0 server adapter was working.
>>
>> I cou
I took a look to see if "no re-deployment when only JSP files are updated"
option on the 3.0 server adapter was working.
I couldn't get it to work. The server adapter is attempting to update JSP files
to an exploded directory structure. This fails since applications are packaged
in a .car arch
On Jun 2, 2011, at 9:52 PM, Forrest Xia wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Forrest Xia wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 11:22 AM, David Jencks wrote:
> Hi Forrest,
>
> I've pushed today's source to people.apache.org. It compiles for me :-) I
> just committed an update to OW
On Jun 2, 2011, at 10:36 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
> I'll take a look
Thanks Shawn. Just noticed that the AppClientModuleBuilder line numbers will be
off by two (I'd reverted the latest commit, I think...).
--kevan
Looks like an appclient failure was introduced sometime between May 28 and now.
I'm getting a failure in testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/sec-client-tests:
Deployer operation failed: AppClientModuleBuilder: Could not load main class:
org.apache.geronimo.test.TestClient
org.apache.geronimo.common.D
On Jun 2, 2011, at 2:05 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
> fyi, this looks like the cause of the corba failure:
>
> java.lang.IllegalStateException: On a thread without an initialized context
> at
> org.apache.geronimo.openwebbeans.GeronimoSingletonSer
On Jun 2, 2011, at 1:47 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Jun 1, 2011, at 11:22 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
>> Hi Forrest,
>>
>> I've pushed today's source to people.apache.org. It compiles for me :-) I
>> just committed an update to OWB that makes
On Jun 1, 2011, at 11:22 PM, David Jencks wrote:
> Hi Forrest,
>
> I've pushed today's source to people.apache.org. It compiles for me :-) I
> just committed an update to OWB that makes it more compatible with aries
> proxying/weaving so you may want to build owb also.
>
> I'll probably be
301 - 400 of 3111 matches
Mail list logo
