[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12844344#action_12844344
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-4959:
Must be dependent upon networ
On Mar 10, 2010, at 3:31 AM, de...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: delos
> Date: Wed Mar 10 08:31:28 2010
> New Revision: 921247
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=921247&view=rev
> Log:
> make trunk build successfully with v30 adapter integration
>
> Added:
>
> geronimo/devtools/eclipse
On Mar 11, 2010, at 9:36 PM, Rex Wang wrote:
>
> Yes, as Forrest said, I want to move to use maven-release-plugin to help the
> 2.1.5 release.
> Please check:
> http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-release-process.html
I'm familiar with the release process. As the 2.1 branch predated this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller closed GERONIMO-4959.
--
Resolution: Invalid
I can only assume I had a configuration problem.
For remote deploy to
On Mar 11, 2010, at 3:54 AM, Rex Wang wrote:
> Hi Jarek,
> Could you help update the scripts?
Read more of my mail... ;-) So, I assume *why* is because of the move to
Genesis 2.0. So, brings up a new question... ;-) Why update G 2.1 to use
Genesis 2.0?
--kevan
On Mar 11, 2010, at 3:54 AM, Rex Wang wrote:
> Hi Jarek,
> Could you help update the scripts?
I'm curious why?
--kevan
On Mar 9, 2010, at 7:40 PM, djen...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: djencks
> Date: Wed Mar 10 00:40:46 2010
> New Revision: 921195
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=921195&view=rev
> Log:
> don't include junit in our server
>
> Modified: geronimo/server/trunk/framework/pom.xml
> URL:
> h
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12843188#action_12843188
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-5175:
Upgrading your JDK level is a
On Mar 9, 2010, at 2:54 AM, Rex Wang wrote:
> Hi, David Blevins,
>
> Since openejb 3.0.2 is a dependency to G 2.1.5, and I don't find any work
> related with this in openejb mailing list, could you please tell us the exact
> time when it will be released?
Hi Rex,
It's best to communicate this
Congrats Forrest!
--kevan
On Mar 8, 2010, at 8:54 PM, Ivan wrote:
> I would like to welcome Forrest aboard, as he recently accepted the Geronimo
> PMC invitation to become a committer. His account (xiaming) was just
> created, so you should start seeing some commits from him soon.
>
> --
> I
On Mar 3, 2010, at 10:46 AM, Rex Wang wrote:
>
> IIRC, current approach is any GEP 2.2.* has the ability to support server
> 2.1.*, 2.0.*, even 1.1.*
> However, I do not think it is a best practice, because as the increase of
> server's version number, GEP might become more and more overstaff
On Mar 3, 2010, at 4:54 AM, Jack Cai wrote:
> My point is that you should run TCK first and show results first before any
> voting...
We often run TCK concurrent with a vote. So, it's not an issue, IMO. The vote
passing can be contingent on TCK looking good.
A note about TCK runs for compone
On Mar 3, 2010, at 12:58 AM, Delos wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Johannes suggested that GEP make release more frequently. The reason is user
> may get new fixes earlier, instead of waiting for next release together with
> Geronimo server. In this way, it will be more convenient for GEP to provide
> n
)
Affects Versions: 2.2.1
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Priority: Blocker
Fix For: 2.2.1
1) The assemble server page is not formatting properly in 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT. Go to
assemble server page, click "expert user" and try to scroll down. Unless I make
the font
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Affects Versions: 2.2.1
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Fix For: 2.2.1
OpenEJB 3.1.3-SNAPSHOT is starting an ejbds listener. Seems like we need to
either disable ejbds or make the host and
Delos,
Since we cancelled the vote and are moving to 6.0.25, we should delete this tag.
--kevan
On Feb 20, 2010, at 11:37 AM, de...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: delos
> Date: Sat Feb 20 16:37:28 2010
> New Revision: 912144
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=912144&view=rev
> Log:
> [maven-
On Feb 25, 2010, at 3:51 AM, Radim Kolar wrote:
>
> Nabble changed URLs for Geronimo Dev/Users mailing lists. Links on top of
> Geronimo homepage are no longer valid. please correct them.
>
> New link for devel is : http://n3.nabble.com/Development-f342155.html
>
> new link for user list is: h
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Affects Versions: 2.2
Reporter: Kevan Miller
GeronimoPropertyPlaceholderConfigurer is used to perform config-substitution
for activemq.xml. However, system properties aren&#
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12837080#action_12837080
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-5142:
Right. Almost any *nix system is g
On Feb 22, 2010, at 4:12 AM, Juergen Weber wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> seems Nabble has moved the Geronimo groups, they are now at
> http://old.nabble.com/Geronimo-f134.html
>
> Could you please update http://geronimo.apache.org/discussion-forums.html ?
Heh. Thanks Juergen.
I've updated the links.
On Feb 20, 2010, at 12:17 PM, Delos wrote:
> This voting is for mavenized tomcat 6.0.24. It will be used by Geronimo
> 2.1.5. Following what we did to tomcat 6.0.20, we are using a forked copy of
> tomcat derived from the tomcat 6.0.24 release, built with maven, with maven
> dependencies, etc
On Feb 19, 2010, at 2:35 PM, David Jencks wrote:
> You should have received an email from Tony Stephenson yesterday on the
> apache committers list explaining how you need to update your apache password
> so you can continue to use apache's nexus and svn.
In case you aren't subscribed (all com
On Feb 15, 2010, at 7:26 AM, Delos wrote:
> I find Ivan's reply told the el spec has passed TCK test. Is that enough?
No. There needs to be a full TCK run. Unless I misunderstood, that hasn't
happened.
--kevan
+1
--kevan
On Feb 5, 2010, at 10:55 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
> I've created a plugin that can be used to upgrade an existing Geronimo
> 2.2 or 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT server from OpenJPA 1.x to the new
> OpenJPA 2.0.0-beta, so users can start experimenting with a JPA 2.0
> certified codebase.
>
> I just up
+1
--kevan
On Feb 12, 2010, at 5:28 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
> I've created a third release candidate of a set of plugins that can be
> used to upgrade an existing Geronimo 2.1.3, 2.1.4 or 2.1.5-SNAPSHOT
> server from OpenJPA 1.x to the new OpenJPA 2.0.0-beta, so users can
> start experimenting wi
On Feb 12, 2010, at 9:50 PM, Delos wrote:
> Could any PMC member help to review it?Thanks!
Unless I'm mistaken, TCK results are needed, also.
--kevan
On Feb 12, 2010, at 3:37 AM, frapien wrote:
>
> I was not successfull.
> I could only install from http://people.apache.org/~dwoods/daytrader-2.1.3/
> Daytrader :: Derby DataSource 2.1.3 and Daytrader :: JMS
> Resource
> 2.1.3
> Daytrader :: Tomcat 2.1.3 Daytrader fa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12832999#action_12832999
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-5144:
Thanks Rick. I suspect (but hav
Please don't post the same request to multiple mailing lists. u...@geronimo is
the most appropriate for this. So, let's discuss there...
--kevan
On Feb 12, 2010, at 4:45 AM, Padma shree wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a sample application which uses the Web messaging service to simulate
> stock quote
Resending to dev@
On Feb 9, 2010, at 3:29 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
> Hi Donald,
> I don't see a source archive that covers this release vote. This is almost
> certainly a bit of a change from some of our past votes. However, IMO, we
> should have source archives (tar.gz/zip
Level: public (Regular issues)
Affects Versions: 2.2, 2.1.4
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Fix For: 2.1.5, 2.2.1
setjavaenv.sh used to require JAVA_HOME or JRE_HOME to be specified. Looks like
it was updated to look for a java runtime in the PATH, and use that, if the
formation for W3C and OMG
> can be removed, since they're already in the common LICENSE file of geronimo
> specs. So the tag content should be right.
>
>
> 在 2010年2月10日 上午1:26，Kevan Miller 写道：
>
>
> The subversion tag does not match the contents of your source di
+1
--kevan
On Feb 9, 2010, at 10:11 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
> To support the upcoming OpenWebBeans milestone release, I would like to
> release candidate 3 of a Beta of the Java Contexts and Dependency
> Injection (JCDI) JSR-299 Spec API.
>
> Note: This release depends upon 3 other votes in pr
+1
Verified source, signature/checksums, build.
--kevan
On Feb 8, 2010, at 10:36 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
> To support the upcoming OpenWebBeans milestone release and as a prereq
> to the geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec-1.0-beta release, I would like to
> release a Beta of the Inject Spec API.
>
> Stagi
+1
Checked source, signature/checksums, build. All looked good.
--kevan
On Feb 8, 2010, at 10:48 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
> To support the upcoming OpenWebBeans milestone release and as a prereq
> for the geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec-1.0-beta release, I would like to release
> a Beta of the EL 2.2 Spec
+1
Source, signature/checksums, build -- all look good.
--kevan
On Feb 3, 2010, at 10:36 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
> To support the upcoming OpenWebBeans milestone release, I would like to
> release a Beta of the Interceptor Spec API.
>
> Staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/rep
The subversion tag does not match the contents of your source distribution
(you've updated the LICENSE file in your source distribution). IMO, the source
distribution is correct (and this is what we are really voting on). However,
IMO the subversion tag should match the contents of your source
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5036?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller reassigned GERONIMO-5036:
--
Assignee: Kevan Miller
> [OpenEJB] Unable to clear Sun JarFileFactory ca
On Feb 4, 2010, at 2:02 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
> Hi Donald;
>
> I have created a new jira issue and attached patches related with
> geronimo_jcdi and geronimo_atinject. Those patches satisfie David Jencks
> concerns.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5121
Thanks Gurkan! Dona
On Feb 2, 2010, at 4:29 AM, Juergen Weber wrote:
> what problems would current 2.1.4 users have if they'd upgrade to 2.2
> instead of 2.1.5?
> What incompatabilities are there?
Upgrading to 2.2 is certainly an option. I don't know of any problems. However,
there are some major upgrades in 2.2 (
On Feb 1, 2010, at 1:59 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 7:15 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
> I took a look at the failover demo currently in sandbox, over the weekend. I
> made some updates to get it building/running on my Mac OS machine.
>
> I like
Passing this along, in case you missed it on committers@
--kevan
On Jan 30, 2010, at 7:36 PM, Noirin Shirley wrote:
> Come along to the first Apache Retreat, in Knockree, Ireland, from 9th
> to 12th April 2010!
>
> If you're not yet registered, visit http://apache.eventbrite.com/ to sign up.
>
On Feb 1, 2010, at 10:23 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
> Still don't like the version decision by the EEG, but guess I'll have to
> update the Geronimo spec and spin another release before the final
> OpenJPA 2.0.0 release.
Me either. If EclipseLink RI is updating, then I guess we should also...
On Jan 28, 2010, at 9:54 PM, Delos wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The vote has passed with the following result :
>
> +1: David Jencks, Kevan Miller, Ivan, Donald Woods, Jay D. McHugh
>
> I will promote the artifacts to the central repo.
>
> Thanks for vote to pass!
Con
On Jan 28, 2010, at 12:27 AM, Delos wrote:
> Hi Kevan,
>
> Thanks for your comment.
>
> Now, I have uploaded the newly signed files, could you try it again? There is
> no other change.
>
> It's my fault. I should have checked all the remote files. Actually, I
> uploaded the newly signed fi
+1. Source, build, checksums, and signatures look good. I installed some
plugins and apps. Seem to be working well. Thanks Delos!
One minor request -- could you start using plain text in your emails? Apache
convention is to not use html formatted emails in mailing list communications.
Call me o
Hi Delos,
Source, checksums, and build all look good. However, there's a problem with
your signing key. It looks like you've signed with your old key (which is no
longer in the KEYS file). So, I'm not able to validate your signature.
I don't see any other issues. However, am -1 due to the signa
+1
Source, build, checksums, and signature all look good.
--kevan
On Jan 25, 2010, at 12:52 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
> Hi, I'd like to release v1.0 of the Bean Validation Spec API, now that
> we have it passing the Bean Validation 1.0 TCK signature tests.
>
> Staging repo:
> https://repository.
On Jan 26, 2010, at 8:42 AM, David Blevins wrote:
>
> On Jan 21, 2010, at 8:21 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jan 21, 2010, at 7:49 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Jan 20, 2010, at 12:15 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>>>
>>
Hi Wendy,
Thanks for the note.
On Jan 27, 2010, at 9:50 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
> The message below was posted on the Maven Users list. I confirmed
> that the checksum from [1] doesn't match, and then tried to verify the
> gpg signature:
>
> imbrium:Downloads wsmoak$ gpg -v xbean-finder-shaded-3
On Jan 25, 2010, at 1:35 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
> On Jan 25, 2010, at 6:41 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>
>> We should be putting some thought on what the Geronimo deliverables are in
>> the web profile world. I think for the most part, this should be just a
>> different assembly that assemble
Forrest,
I applaud your recent patches to the geronimo samples along with your other
geronimo contributions.
A release vote being held by a non-committer is unusual, at best. I see that
Delos has performed most of the recent commits regarding samples and is listed
as a co-author of this vote.
On Jan 20, 2010, at 9:26 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
> Sounds good.
>
> Maybe we can include both Daytrader 2.1.3 and 2.2 in the same release
> vote... :-) I had 2.1.3 up for a vote, but there was not enough +1
> votes to release it. Hopefully, we'll get enough votes this time.
They'll need to be
On Jan 15, 2010, at 8:51 PM, Ivan wrote:
> 2010/1/16 Jarek Gawor
> Hey folks,
>
> I tried building a server with welcome app with Tomcat in trunk and
> ran into a few of problems (at least one of which I thought was
> previously fixed). I'm getting these error when starting a server with
> welc
I took a look at the failover demo currently in sandbox, over the weekend. I
made some updates to get it building/running on my Mac OS machine.
I like the demo. It's a good demonstration of Geronimo's capabilities. I'd be
interested in seeing a formal release of the demo. A few demo and Geronim
On Jan 14, 2010, at 10:15 PM, Delos wrote:
> Well, I will upload the source code for GEP to
> http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/2.2.0/RC2/staging_site, just
> like David did for geronimo 2.2 voting. Then, you can review the source code
> there.
>
> Do we need another voting?
It
We seem to be missing one important part of the release process - the actual
source "release".
Note the source-release files in http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/2.2/ :
geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz, geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip (and their
associated .asc signature and md5/sha checksu
Thanks Donald. Looks good. Here's my +1.
--kevan
On Jan 13, 2010, at 9:29 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
> Hi, I'd like to release v1.0 of the JPA 2.0 Spec API, now that we have
> OpenJPA trunk and our API passing the JPA2 TCK.
>
> Staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/org
On Jan 12, 2010, at 9:17 AM, Ashish Jain wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I would like to know the view of the community on redeploy support for
> farming. Does
> the community see any value add in having this functionality?
Can you be more specific about what you are trying to do? In general, I doubt
any
On Jan 12, 2010, at 10:20 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
> Last code changes were checked in on 12/11/2009, so a 2009 copyright date
> should still be valid. I'd rather not respin unless it's absolutely
> required
I see an svn commit yesterday. The NOTICE covers all "source" which may or may
no
Hi Donald,
All looks good to me, sigs/checksums/etc look good. Source is good. Builds
fine. However... One thing: the copyright date in the NOTICE is 2009. I'm not
sure it's absolutely required, but seems a simple matter to update to 2010.
--kevan
On Jan 12, 2010, at 5:24 PM, Donald Woods wro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5024?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12799297#action_12799297
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-5024:
Thanks for creating this, Janet.
On Jan 12, 2010, at 11:06 AM, Jack Cai wrote:
> I can retry on this :-)
>
> It was difficult to get my patches into the code base the last time I
> tried. Looks like few Commons committers care about the procrun
> code... I just checked the latest commit log of procrun. It does have
> some activ
I just ran across the subject executables in our svn
(https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/branches/2.2/plugins/procrun/src/main/resources/bin).
Besides a README file in a Jira
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4394), it's not clear where the
source for these executabl
On Jan 8, 2010, at 3:07 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today I attach the sample patches to GERONIMO-4741. After someone helps to
> commit it, I think we can push the Geronimo 2.2 samples to release process.
Excellent! Thanks for working on that Forrest. Hoping somebody can have a look
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4896?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12797707#action_12797707
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-4896:
I like this a lot better than a
Built fine. I also downloaded update site. Installed ok and simple tests looked
fine. So, other than problems already noted, looks ok to me...
--kevan
On Jan 4, 2010, at 9:00 AM, Delos wrote:
> Hi everyone, Please review and vote on the release of the Geronimo Eclipse
> Plugin 2.2 RC1.
>
> The
I scanned the source with RAT and found a number of issues. They must be fixed
prior to a release. So, here's my -1.
The following files are missing apache source license headers. Most of them
will require a header.
!? ./plugins/about.html
!? ./plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.core/sche
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5014?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller resolved GERONIMO-5014.
Resolution: Fixed
Patch applied. Thanks Mark!
I added a license header to Scope.java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5014?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller reassigned GERONIMO-5014:
--
Assignee: Kevan Miller
> JSR-303 api needs to update the ElementDescriptor sect
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5013?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller closed GERONIMO-5013.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Seems to address the issue.
> ConcurrentModificationException
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5013?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller reassigned GERONIMO-5013:
--
Assignee: Kevan Miller
> ConcurrentModificationException
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Affects Versions: 2.1.4, 2.2
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Fix For: 2.1.5, 2.2.1
I ran into a ConcurrentModificationException during server startup on 2.2 on a
Windows system. The exception was intermittent and the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4985?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller resolved GERONIMO-4985.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.0
I made some modifications to the pom.xml
On Dec 11, 2009, at 2:09 PM, David Jencks wrote:
> I'm seeing this kind of error in building console bits... anyone else seeing
> it or know how to fix it? Maybe I need to build something locally???
> Haven't looked far yet.
>
> [INFO] snapshot org.apache.geronimo.ext.tomcat:jasper-el:7.0.0.
On Dec 10, 2009, at 10:57 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Let's keep (or try to) trunk easy to build. Whenever you make a change
> to some snapshot dependency please publish a new snapshot of it. That
> will make it easy for the next person to build the latest code.
That's a good point. W
Here's my +1.
I reviewed the source and binaries in
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/
--kevan
On Dec 8, 2009, at 2:56 AM, David Jencks wrote:
> I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2.2 release candidate built using the
> maven-release
On Dec 9, 2009, at 6:28 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
> Hi folks;
>
> We would like to port our JSR-299 and JSR-330 related API projects into
> Geronimo spec. project. How could we start ?
Hi Gurkan,
Cool. Creating a Jira and patch for creating the projects in
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ger
On Dec 8, 2009, at 9:36 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
> README & RELEASE NOTES are not included in the assembly images - just in the
> source. I think these should also be in the assemblies and this is what we
> have done in the past.
>
> RELEASE NOTES in the source is not updated with the appropriate
On Dec 8, 2009, at 9:36 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
>
> Thanks for pulling this together David!
>
> Here are some things that I've noticed thus far (not necessarily show
> stoppers) ...
>
> RAT results:
> These files without Apache headers:
> ./plugins/concurrent/geronimo-concurrent-core/src/main/jav
On Dec 3, 2009, at 1:47 AM, Trygve Hardersen wrote:
>
> [INFO]
>
> [ERROR] BUILD FAILURE
> [INFO]
>
> [INFO] Compilation failure
>
> error: error r
On Dec 2, 2009, at 4:13 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's been brought to my attention that the terminology used to describe Java
> EE is incorrect in this web page:
> http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDEV/road-map-for-jee6-web-profile.html
>
> The use of the term JEE is incorrect, and shou
On Dec 2, 2009, at 4:18 PM, yduchesne wrote:
>
> back to square one: did a
> mvn clean install -Dstage=bootstrap
> and then
> a mvn clean install
>
> and I got this error again (the plexus.core error is gone):
>
> [INFO]
> -
On Dec 2, 2009, at 11:51 AM, David Jencks wrote:
>
> On Dec 2, 2009, at 1:57 AM, Ivan wrote:
>
>> I am thinking whether there is maven plugin would help us to repackge the
>> tomcat jar file to include our changes, so that we do not need to maintain
>> the whole Tomcat source codes, maybe jus
On Dec 2, 2009, at 6:14 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> [2] I am not sure about Bean Validation, but the JBoss RI is published
> under ASL 2.0
Right. Also, Apache Commons has been discussing sponsoring a Bean Validation
project in Apache Incubator.
See http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/V
On Dec 1, 2009, at 5:01 AM, Jack Cai wrote:
> There might be something wired with my machine, but I'm seeing the below
> error when starting the release candidate in Windows XP with IBM JDK 1.5.
Discover anything new about this? I had no problems on Mac OS with either Java
5 or 6.
--kevan
On Dec 2, 2009, at 6:14 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> as most of you know, the Java EE 6 is final and there is a Web Profile
> for it (see [1] for all its components).
>
> In Apache (fortunately) we (almost ([2])) all of the bits:
> -Apache Tomcat
> -Apache MyFaces
> -Apache
On Dec 1, 2009, at 2:27 AM, David Jencks wrote:
>
> If you mean the previous main geronimo releases, I strongly disagree. We
> have no reason I can see to avoid following maven defaults here. With the
> exception of the main geronimo release, previously done through an arcane and
> IMO inco
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12784451#action_12784451
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-4753:
I added the following to se
On Nov 30, 2009, at 10:37 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
> On Nov 30, 2009, at 7:11 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
>>
>> On Nov 30, 2009, at 10:00 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Nov 30, 2009, at 6:23 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>>>
>&g
On Nov 30, 2009, at 10:01 PM, David Jencks wrote:
> u you are working way too hard
>
> mvn clean install -Dstage=bootstrap
> mvn clean install
Agreed. Also, I've started a 'mvn deploy', which should help with the bootstrap
requirement...
--kevan
On Nov 30, 2009, at 10:00 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
> On Nov 30, 2009, at 6:23 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
>> There were several files missing source license headers. I've fixed in
>> branches/2.1
>
> 2.1??
Heh. branches/2.2 is what I meant to type.
>
>
There were several files missing source license headers. I've fixed in
branches/2.1. They would both merit a -1 from me.
Where is the code in svn? Although I use the source archives to verify the
release, I also usually diff against the code in svn. Couldn't figure out how
to do that, here...
On Nov 24, 2009, at 10:21 PM, Ivan wrote:
> How about updating myfaces version to 1.2.8 for Geronimo 2.2 ?
Personally, I'd leave 2.2 as is... It's time to release 2.2. Better to avoid
introducing new problems... Target the upgrade to 2.2.1.
Would go ahead and upgrade to latest MyFaces in branc
: deployment
Affects Versions: 2.1.4
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Fix For: 2.1.5
I tried to use remote deploy, yesterday. After configuring
RemoteDeployHostname, it didn't work.
I poked around a bit more. Looks like remote deploy is broken on
geronimo-jetty6 but worki
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller closed GERONIMO-4658.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> Console should let you add/edit artifact-aliases. When installin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller reassigned GERONIMO-4658:
--
Assignee: Kevan Miller (was: David Jencks)
> Console should let you add/e
On Nov 18, 2009, at 1:39 PM, David Jencks wrote:
> I'm hoping to get a vote started this week on 2.2, but probably wont start
> trying to actually release until tomorrow (thursday in the US). If you can
> get it in before then, fine.
Looks like TCK is going to need a little attention, before
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4957?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller reassigned GERONIMO-4957:
--
Assignee: Kevan Miller
> javax.el.CompositeELResolver is not thread-s
(Regular issues)
Components: specs
Affects Versions: 2.1.4, 2.1.5, 2.2, 2.2.1, 3.0
Reporter: Kevan Miller
A user reported that they get an intermittent NullPointerException:
17:08:45,133 ERROR [[jsp]] Servlet.service() for servlet jsp threw exception
901 - 1000 of 3111 matches
Mail list logo
