That is sooo cool.
I also noticed that there were version specific user and developer
guides in the first column too. They can be merged into a single row
as "User Guide" with appropriate links in the remaining columns.
Cheers
Prasad
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 5:22 PM, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTEC
>
> prasad:
> sandbox/restructure
This has served its purpose and is obsolete now. Feel free to delete it.
Cheers
Prasad
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 6:07 PM, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A few years ago I read about an information based perpetual motion
> machine someone came up with.
Most definitely. Thank you Joe for shouldering such a big
responsibility for the project.
Cheers
Prasad
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Feb 20, 2008, at 1:15 PM, Jay D. McHugh wrote:
>
> > I've been referred to as a puppy before :)
> >
> > But I'd b
Thanx Matt.
Congrats Kevan ! (the band is now playing *Hail to the Chief* )
Cheers
Prasad
On Jan 16, 2008 3:10 PM, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Recently I have had several things change personally and I have found
> it increasingly difficult to keep up with the Geronimo mailing li
My thinking on this was to leave it as is for 2.1. We fix this right
for 2.2, when we split the trunk into different svn trees.
Moving the c-m-p configuration settings from configs parent pom to the
root pom is not a problem. It is the boatload of property settings
that will cause Jason good grief
Failed to retrieve
> Portlet Definition for demo::BookmarkPortlet
> 00:16:10,485 WARN [JetspeedPortletContainerWrapper] Could not render
> PortletWindowdp-18 as it has no PortletDefintion defined.
> 00:16:10,487 WARN [PersistenceBrokerPortletEntityAccess] Failed to retrieve
> Portlet Def
The work on integrating Jetspeed with Geronimo is currently in the sandbox.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/sandbox/jetspeed-integration/
This is what the following modules do.
jetspeed-base:
-
This module installs 5 common jetspeed jars into the G repository.
jetspeed-a
Root cause:
11:19:20,898 INFO [Log4jService] --
11:19:33,423 ERROR [[TomcatWebContainer]] "Restricted listeners
property file not found
11:19:36,093 INFO [startup] Creating TransactionManager(id=Default
Transaction Manager)
11:19:36,096 ERROR [GBeanIns
On Dec 31, 2007 4:41 PM, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First of all I appear to have broken the build last night with some
> changes to get the roller plugin building again. I think I've
> managed to fix all the problems -- the it tests all pass for me. Let
> me know if there are stil
Correction: Haven't had the time to *look* into it. Dunno what it will
take to fix it.
Cheers
Prasad
On Dec 21, 2007 11:51 AM, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The daily automated builds have been failing for the same reason for a
> few days now. Haven't
The daily automated builds have been failing for the same reason for a
few days now. Haven't had the time to fix it.
Cheers
Prasad
On Dec 20, 2007 2:57 PM, Erik B. Craig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
>
> Has anyone else been experiencing problems building since yesterday?
> Attempting to buil
My first guess is that the deploy tool could be broken. The client
jars in the webservices-testsuite are deployed with the help of
geronimo-maven-plugin:deploy-module.
Just for kicks, can you please try using the deploy.bat ?
Cheers
Prasad
On Dec 20, 2007 11:24 AM, ivanrc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
Most of the tests in the webservices-testsuite have a client piece in
it. You will find simple examples of the plan there.
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/branches/2.0/testsuite/webservices-testsuite/
Cheers
Prasad
On Dec 20, 2007 6:33 AM, ivanrc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> He
> in the log file.
> The right svn revision numbers are also included in the email
> notifications, so that's another way to figure this out.
>
> Jarek
>
>
> On Dec 19, 2007 11:29 AM, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I don't think we have
ed......
> .
>
> Thanks
> Anita
>
>
> --- Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I don't think we have a way of knowing what svn revision a final
> > Geronimo binary came from. Is there
I don't think we have a way of knowing what svn revision a final
Geronimo binary came from. Is there ?
Maybe we should include a revision.txt file in ${geronimo_home} which
contains the svn revision number of the build from which the binary
was built.
Cheers
Prasad
On Dec 19, 2007 10:03 AM, Anit
+1
Cheers
Prasad
On Dec 11, 2007 4:58 AM, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Folks, a small change to Genesis was made to support a custom legal
> resource bundle for the GShell release. I'd like to get this out so
> we can get GShell out too.
>
> +1 -Release it
> +0 -Eh, whatever
I'm with Matt on this. Since it is not perfect to everybody's
satisfaction, let us move it to the /plugins tree (at least for now).
Sandbox is definitely not the place for it.
Erik, contrary to your belief, the /plugins tree does not contain only
those plugins that work independent of G. It *most
+1
Cheers
Prasad
On Dec 6, 2007 9:43 AM, Rick McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The discussion thread has been out there long enough for comment, and
> those who have responded appear positive about the prospect. I think
> it's time to put this to a vote. The full proposal from Matt Hogstrom
I agree. We should make GShell flexible like our Geronimo server.
I don't know if this makes sense but I'll just think aloud. At it's
core should be the most basic features like start/stop and
deploy/undeploy. Since Groovy is the culprit, can Groovy sit this one
out ? I believe we use goals from g
I have noticed this irksome behavior too. AFAIK, there isn't a better
way. For now, this is a gaping hole in our plugin design.
Seems like when a plugin is uninstalled, we'll have to uninstall all
the child components recursively.
Cheers
Prasad
On Dec 6, 2007 10:04 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha <[EMAIL
Congrats Jay !
Cheers
Prasad
On Dec 4, 2007 11:26 PM, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
> Please join us in congratulating Jay McHugh as the newest member of
> the Geronimo PMC. It's been great to have Jay working with us as a
> committer on Geronimo. Even better to have him join us
Congrats Erik !
Cheers
Prasad
On Nov 20, 2007 11:45 AM, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please extend a welcome to Erik Craig who is the latest committer to
> be added to the Geronimo fold. Erik has had a sustained and continued
> track record in working on the J2G conversion tool as
Hi Jacek,
The testsuite runs only after a successful build. So yes, the build
here too has had no failures.
To run the testsuite-
cd ${geronimo}/testsuite
mvn [-DassemblyId=tomcat] [-DinstallDirectory=c:\apache]
The -DinstallDirectory option is useful on a windows machine to
circumvent the long
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12540915
]
Prasad Kashyap commented on GERONIMO-3586:
--
This is a delicate fine line. I think I understand Anita&#
My initial roadmap was to split the tree into smaller svn projects
post 2.2 release. So when we create projects for framework, apps,
plugins etc, we could also move the assemblies to the appropriate
tree. So assembling the framework will be done in the framework svn
project while the javaee5 assemb
Just FYI -,
The framework/modules/geronimo-j2ee is just one artifact that
does/should not be included in the framework-assembly.
This artifact is needed to build c-m-p. So it builds along with the
other modules in framework. It's need there is seen the greatest in a
bootstrap build.
Cheers
Prasa
l
> be moved into the plugins directory now?
>
> Also, shouldn't we include some notes in the BUILDING.txt and/or GMOxDEV
> about the new directory layout and where new code should be placed, like
> the difference between the framework, component and plugin directories...
>
On 11/2/07, Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Prasad Kashyap wrote:
> > As we get close to releasing Geronimo 2.1 and look beyond, I'd like to
> > discuss a few usability improvements we can do to G. I am
> > cross-posting this to the user-list so that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap closed GERONIMO-3565.
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Prasad Kashyap
http://www.nabble.com/forum
server/trunk/modules deleted via Revision 591372
server/trunk/configs deleted via Revision 591373.
This completes Geronimo-3565.
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/31/07, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The restructured trunk has built successfully 3 times now. It has
> passed our t
As we get close to releasing Geronimo 2.1 and look beyond, I'd like to
discuss a few usability improvements we can do to G. I am
cross-posting this to the user-list so that we can get a direct
feedback from our dear users.
1. Dynamic status messages. Some operations may take a certain amount
of ti
Yep. It's time !
I really want to see how flexibly the user community will actually
build their servers.
I also wish we'd all spend some extra time and effort to check for
security issues in the server in general and in our individual domain
of expertise, in particular.
Cheers
Prasad
On 11/1/07
Good catch. I have updated this. Let's wait for the wheels to turn and
the page to be federated.
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/31/07, Erik B. Craig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmmm,
>
> Right you are... Yeah... I agree with Jason, this should /probably/ get
> updated a bit =P.
>
> Jason Warner wrote:
> >
, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The -Dstage=former is not working as desired. I was unsuccessful in
> fixing it tonight. I'll try again tomorrow.
>
> However, the new restructuring is building fine. It has passed
> testsuite tests too.
>
> (If it passes T
Whoa ! Somehow this thread never showed up on my radar screen.
Comments inline -
Cheers
Prasad.
On 10/29/07, Paul McMahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 27, 2007, at 11:32 AM, David Jencks wrote:
>
> >>> The admin console needs to be lightweight and portable so it is
> >>> based on Pluto.
I think it should.
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/27/07, Donald Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Shouldn't the groupId be org.apache.geronimo.samples instead of
> org.apache.geronimo.applications, to match the existing samples and
> directory name?
>
> -Donald
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Author: gawo
eting it the day after). Does anybody really
really want it to work ?
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/30/07, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry and thanx Jarek. I have fixed the security-deployer-config
> pom.xml and plan.xml. This will remove any extraneous dependencies it
> has
o.j2ee.deployment.ModuleBuilder, interface
> org.apache.geronimo.j2ee.deployment.ActivationSpecInfoLocator,
> interface org.apache.geronimo.j2ee.deployment.ModuleBuilder, interface
> org.apache.geronimo.deployment.NamespaceDrivenBuilder, interface
> org.apache.geronimo.deployment.NamespaceDrivenBuilder, interface
> org.apache.ge
ly, I shall remove the old trunk pieces
by eod, Thursday, Nov 1 2007.
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/30/07, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am restructuring the trunk in svn to reflect our flexible server.
> Instead of a move, it will be a two-step copy/delete process. I shall
> fi
Reporter: Prasad Kashyap
Fix For: 2.1
http://www.nabble.com/forum/ViewPost.jtp?post=13469170&framed=y&skin=134
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
I am restructuring the trunk in svn to reflect our flexible server.
Instead of a move, it will be a two-step copy/delete process. I shall
first begin by copying some directories to other directories. Server
binaries will be built from the newly created directories. After they
have gone thro' 2 days
07, at 3:47 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
>
> > With the latest commit to sandbox, I have all the artifacts building
> > successfully. We have good assemblies too. Tthe groupId and artifactId
> > of all the artifacts have essentially remained the same.
>
> I noticed that th
I agree. Our strategy to make Geronimo secure should include an
elaborate set of unit testcases, a rich set of tests in the
security-testsuite in our testsuite framework, along with peer
review of code in components that are potential security risks.
We should aim to have imbricate or maybe even
I'm with Paul on this. I envision a Migrate2Geronimo Toolkit that will
consist of a suite of individual plugins (for Eclipse and G), each
handling the migration from a specific appserver to G. Of course, all
these may depend on a base or common plugin. But the user will only
deal with the plugin
; perhaps it is time. But I'm still not convinced that it would be worth
> the complexities it would bring and it doesn't consume a huge amount of
> space.
>
> Joe
>
> >
> > David Jencks wrote:
> >> Good work!! A couple comments inline.
> >> On O
nt of
> space.
>
> Joe
>
> >
> > David Jencks wrote:
> >> Good work!! A couple comments inline.
> >> On Oct 29, 2007, at 7:48 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
> >>
> >>> I spend most of the weekend trying to restructure trunk to reflect the
>
#1. The example asks you to create a DB named InventoryDB and then run
some sql commands to create tables.
#2. Your web.xml has a resource ref to jdbc/InventoryDS. This is a
part of the jndi name of the datasource (not database).
#3. The geronimo-web.xml links your jdbc/InventoryDS with the
datas
Vamsi, you have removed the wrong plan.
This is THE actual plan. The plan to be removed is the one under src/plan
http://www.nabble.com/forum/ViewPost.jtp?post=13435934&framed=y&skin=134
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/29/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: vamsic007
> Date: Mon Oct
obably the best thing would be
> >> to have
> >> 'releases' or snapshots of the sample apps up on the wiki, along with
> >> the source being in the subversion repo.
> >>
> >>
> >> -Erik
> >>
> >> Prasad Kashyap wrote:
> &
inline -
On 10/29/07, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Good work!! A couple comments inline.
> On Oct 29, 2007, at 7:48 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
>
> > I spend most of the weekend trying to restructure trunk to reflect the
> > new flexible server and I should tell
Paul,
I can help you do this.
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/29/07, Paul McMahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 28, 2007, at 3:22 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
>
> > Any thoughts on setting up automated builds of Samples at least
> > once a week?
>
> That would be helpful. Now that we have catalog support
While a part of me seems to agree with you that we should remove the
zip file from the samples' wiki pages, a greater part of me feels that
we may be forcing some our users to now get SVN.
A user who just downloads and installs from a binary server will have
no need for svn. But just to get to the
I spend most of the weekend trying to restructure trunk to reflect the
new flexible server and I should tell you, it has been one shitty job
much akin to untangling the knots of Medusa's hair.
To begin with I wanted to build just the modules and configs (along
with the necessary buildsupport and
Thanx Kevan.
+1.
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/26/07, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Oct 26, 2007, at 10:35 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
>
> > I don't see why we shouldn't. But can someone more informed please
> > list the pros and cons.
>
> Here&#x
I don't see why we shouldn't. But can someone more informed please
list the pros and cons.
Thanx
Prasad
On 10/26/07, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i think the subject is explicit. What do people think about that ?
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
>
> Blo
+1
I don't know if GShell already has this capability but I'd like it to
be useful for installing plugins too.
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/25/07, Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Title says it all...I'd really like to see gshell as the default
> execution for Geronimo 2.1. Any objectsions? J
AIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I still have problem building G v2.0.2 from svn tag
> org.apache.xbean:xbean-naming:jar:3.2-r579367 is missing anyone else
> seeing this ?
> regards
>Peter
>
> Prasad Kashyap wrote:
> > The problem occurred b'coz one of the remote repos
I really get a
> SNAPSHOT as I am trying to build from the v2.0.2 tag of the svn tree?
>
> Cheers
>Peter Petersson
>
>
>
> Prasad Kashyap wrote:
> > The org.apache.axis2:axis2-kernel:jar:1.3 which depends on this
> > artifact should have it's woden dependency
The org.apache.axis2:axis2-kernel:jar:1.3 which depends on this
artifact should have it's woden dependency set to
1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT. This can then be found at
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/woden/woden/1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT/
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/22/07, Pe
The woden artifact is being pulled in as a transitive dependency of
axis-2. The fix should go there. A temporary fix would be to exclude
this from our geronimo-webservices module. But I am not sure how
important woden is for us and what else it will break.
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/22/07, Jacek Laskows
Interesting ! Yet another SOA choice, along with Apache Tuscany.
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/22/07, Kristian Köhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> we developed a OpenSource SOA Stack based on Apache Geronimo. The stack
> includes an Enterprise Service Bus (Apache ServiceMix), a Business Process
>
+1.
Most popular downloads (Maven, SunJZDK etc) are like this.
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/16/07, Jarek Gawor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just a small thought, since I think we are trying to move G 1.2 and
> 1.1 users onto G 2.0 maybe we should separate 2.0 downloads from the
> older downloads. Right n
+1
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/12/07, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
> I've prepared a 2.0.2 release candidate for review and vote.
>
> http://people.apache.org/~kevan/release-votes/geronimo-2.0.2-dist/
> contains the 8 Java EE and Minimal server (tar/zip and tomcat/jetty)
> binaries. Her
A quick investigation into this gave rise to some insights and more questions -
Insights:
1) An explicit-versions.properties gets generated by the PackageMojo
while building every config.
2) I doubt if this is getting serialized into the car. So I am unsure
if this ever gets used.
3) An explicit-v
Ah.. #2 in your list above hadn't registered well. Sorry.
Anyways, I get it now. But I'll still answer your questions below.
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/11/07, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Oct 11, 2007, at 10:07 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
>
> > So i
So in summary, do we keep the lists mutually exclusive ? Paul, do you
still see a need for a merge/override option ?
If so, I'll slowly deprecate the option. Since
almost all configs have now been converted to plugins, I think it is
time we used the maven dependencies as default anyways. The pres
My bad.
Now it is done.
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/11/07, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Oct 11, 2007, at 11:23 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Author: prasad
> > Date: Thu Oct 11 08:23:05 2007
> > New Revision: 583850
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=583850&view=rev
> >
I had to use the MaxPermSize of 256m on RedHat for this to work.
On Windows, my mavenrc_pre.bat had some settings that I had to remove.
Now it works fine with just 128M
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/11/07, Shiva Kumar H R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I used a MaxPermSize of 256m and build worked fine for
On 10/10/07, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Oct 8, 2007, at 7:45 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
>
> > Comments inline -
> >
> > Thank you for your patience.
> >
> > On 10/8/07, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
Comments inline -
Thank you for your patience.
On 10/8/07, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2 replies in one go :-)
>
> On Oct 8, 2007, at 2:27 PM, Paul McMahan wrote:
>
> > On Oct 8, 2007, at 4:49 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
> >
> >> Can we make
Can we make the c-m-p use the maven dependencies by default ? 58 of
the 95 configs already use the maven deps. There are approx 15-20
configs that need to be converted to plugins. Odds are we'll end up
with 75% of our configs using maven deps. Thus we should consider
using the maven deps as default
The script that runs the build has MAVEN_OPTS set thus
export MAVEN_OPTS="-XX:MaxPermSize=128m -Xms512m -Xmx1024m"
I guess this is related to the same trunk build hanging while building configs
http://www.nabble.com/Trunk-build-hangs-on-windows-tf4571564s134.html
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/8/07, Paul M
I removed all in the c-m-p configuration to let it get resolved.
Cheers
Prasad
On 8 Oct 2007 14:10:48 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OpenEJB trunk at 582811
> Geronimo Revision: 582825 built with tests included
>
> See the full build-0935.log file at
> http://people.apach
These test results are not accurate. The tests were hanging and
stepping into the next scheduled builds. I killed it.
Cheers
Prasad
On 7 Oct 2007 14:33:10 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Geronimo Revision: 582613 built with tests included
>
> See the full build-0800.log file
;
> > Thanks
> > Anita
> >
> > --- Tim McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Prasad, I'm not -- I just successfully built trunk on
> >> Windows..
> >>
> >>
> >> Prasad Kashyap wrote:
> >>> Si
Since 10/03, I'm seeing the trunk build hang on windows while doing
one of the configs. It was packaging the car while it froze.
The memory usage was at 300+. The build was the only program running.
The automated builds on Linux doesn't seem to have this problem.
Any other windows user seeing th
OK. I cheated.. slightly.. just a li'l bit :-)
Yes. On the build machine, we do build with a clean repo every time.
Maven, I think, automatically mirrors it's "central" repo to ibiblio.
Ibiblio has now become slow and timesout frequently. Now I have
overridden the mirror settings for the central
I'm seeing a different trunk failure on Windows. I'm at Rev: 581764.
Fresh checkout and a clean repo.
http://rifers.org/paste/show/5677
The automated builds on linux does not seem to have this problem. I'm
going to verify this on another windows machine tomorrow.
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/3/07, Jare
On 10/3/07, Ted Kirby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cool! I wrote a (cough, cough) perl script to generate wiki markup
> for a table from the data in the configs/*/pom.xml files, and updated
> the wiki page with it. I then produced a merged table to compare
> existing pom descriptions to the ones
gt; On Oct 1, 2007, at 3:21 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
>
> > Does this list of problems still exist ?
>
> see comments inline
> >
> > Cheers
> > Prasad
> >
> > On 9/11/07, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I've now updated en
They say, misery loves company. Pardon my schadenfreude, but I'm
relieved to know I've not been on some list targeted for victimization
:-)
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/2/07, Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Lin Sun wrote:
> > Me too! I haven't been able to build geronimo 2.0 branch since this
has fallen back to it's old ways of reporting missing
dependencies of geronimo-axis -> openjpa artifacts.
My next attempt would be to move the builds from behind the firewall
to out into the zones machines.
Any other ideas ? Any other machines ?
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/1/07, Prasad Kashyap
Does this list of problems still exist ?
Cheers
Prasad
On 9/11/07, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've now updated enough of the configs so we can see if we can
> assemble them into a server. It would be great if some one else
> could take a look at some of the remaining ones, list a
These build problems have consistently occurred while downloading the
transitive dependencies of geronimo-axis, particularly, transitive
dependencies of openjpa.
I am going to try the following two things to fix this problem -
1) stagger the 2.0 and 2.1 builds
2) upgrade to maven 2.0.7.
If this f
Oh.. btw, I've already fixed this app to work on 2.0.1.
Cheers
Prasad
On 9/28/07, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Toby,
>
> That sample is in svn now.
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/samples/trunk/samples/timereport/
>
> Feel free to submit a
Toby,
That sample is in svn now.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/samples/trunk/samples/timereport/
Feel free to submit a patch :-)
Cheers
Prasad
On 9/17/07, toby cabot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I'm playing around with application security in Geronimo and found the
> "Web
Yep. I thought so too. Working on it already.
Cheers
Prasad
On 9/26/07, Jarek Gawor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, maybe it's time to fail the build if the tests fail (or as in
> this case the server doesn't even startup).
>
> Jarek
>
> On 26 Sep 2007 20:49:25 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL
This is weird. The maven-maven-plugin aborts when it encounters an
error on Linux. On Windows, it keeps going.
Cheers
Prasad
On 9/25/07, Jarek Gawor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh, nice. Is there a way to configure maven not to abort the tests in such
> case?
>
> Jarek
>
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/trunk/20070925/test-1600.log
We have to exclude the ejbcontainer tests.
Cheers
Prasad.
On 9/25/07, Jarek Gawor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Prasad,
>
> Do you know why the ResultsSummary page only shows a subset of the
> results for 2.1? For example, th
> deployment-testsuite
> o deploy-tests
The 1 error in deployment-testsuite/deploy-tests is caused by this JIRA.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3199
> enterprise-testsuite
> o ejbcontainer-tests
We had a full good run of ejbcontainer tests when we had Openejb 2.1.
We need to do
David Blevins,
Can you please create an account for me on that machine you promised.
Maybe that will help me get successful OpenEJB builds and thus
successful G builds.
Cheers
Prasad
On 21 Sep 2007 10:06:26 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OpenEJB trunk at 0
> Geronimo Revis
/07, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sep 19, 2007, at 4:28 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
>
> > OK. I have enabled the unit tests to run on all builds for both trees
> > (2.0 and trunk).
> >
> > The testsuite presently runs only with all 2.0 builds. I&
OK. I have enabled the unit tests to run on all builds for both trees
(2.0 and trunk).
The testsuite presently runs only with all 2.0 builds. I'm soon going
to enable it to run on all trunk builds too.
Now that all tests are running, there will be only 4 builds a day - 4
am, 10 am, 4 pm and 10 pm
Anybody know what the deal with this error is ?
[ERROR] BUILD ERROR
[INFO]
[INFO] Unable to create configuration for deployment
Unable to resolve dependency org.codehaus.swizzle/swizzle-stream//jar
Parent stack:
org
I don't mind if INFO is the default log level. It would be nice if we
can also change it
1. during Geronimo startup.
2. during runtime.
Possible ?
Cheers
Prasad
On 9/11/07, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The intent of this thread is to discuss the default log level for the
> Geronimo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap closed GERONIMO-3464.
Resolution: Invalid
Failure caused by preceding
Guess Tomcat is more flexible.
>
)
Components: deployment
Environment: Windows XP
Reporter: Prasad Kashyap
Assignee: David Jencks
Priority: Critical
Fix For: 2.0.2
I have a very simple web.xml whose only servlet definition contains an
{code}
AsyncServlet
The javadoc-plugin configuration in genesis in set to use jdk 1.4.
Rebuild genesis/configs/project-config by changing the javadoc-plugin
configuration in it to use jdk 1.5. Then run site at c-m-p. This
should fix it.
Cheers
Prasad
On 9/8/07, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thought I m
About time ! Congrats Shiva !
Cheers
Prasad
On 9/7/07, Vamsavardhana Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The Geronimo PMC is pleased to announce that Shiva Kumar H R has recently
> accepted our invitation to become an Apache Geronimo committer. Shiva has
> been contributing to Geronim
1 - 100 of 1266 matches
Mail list logo
