On Jul 12, 2012, at 4:17 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
> If no more vote, I would push this out on this Friday.
Sounds good, Forrest. Thanks!
Just to be complete you'll be:
1) calling the vote
2) pushing the source and binaries to dist/
3) pushing the maven binaries
--kevan
If no more vote, I would push this out on this Friday.
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 9:42 PM, Forrest Xia wrote:
> Any more vote on this release? or I will push the binaries to our web site.
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 4:06 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Jarek
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 7:1
Any more vote on this release? or I will push the binaries to our web site.
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 4:06 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
> +1
>
> Jarek
>
> On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Forrest Xia wrote:
> > Hi Devs,
> >
> > With correction of repositoryList URL, here we have the 3rd release
> > cand
+1
Jarek
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Forrest Xia wrote:
> Hi Devs,
>
> With correction of repositoryList URL, here we have the 3rd release
> candidate for vote. Please help vote at your earliest convenient time.
>
> The server code up for vote is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repo
+1
-David
On Jul 3, 2012, at 4:19 PM, Forrest Xia wrote:
> Hi Devs,
>
> With correction of repositoryList URL, here we have the 3rd release candidate
> for vote. Please help vote at your earliest convenient time.
>
> The server code up for vote is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/rep
+1 Thanks, Forrest !
2012/7/6 Yi Xiao
> the build is ok, Signature/checksum looks good,
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Rex Wang wrote:
>
>> +1, All looked good to me, great to see 3.0!! Thanks Forrest!
>>
>> -Rex
>>
>>
>> 2012/7/6 Forrest Xia
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 10
the build is ok, Signature/checksum looks good,
+1
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Rex Wang wrote:
> +1, All looked good to me, great to see 3.0!! Thanks Forrest!
>
> -Rex
>
>
> 2012/7/6 Forrest Xia
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Jul 5, 2012, at 9
+1, All looked good to me, great to see 3.0!! Thanks Forrest!
-Rex
2012/7/6 Forrest Xia
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jul 5, 2012, at 9:27 PM, Forrest Xia wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Kevan Miller
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Jul 5,
Signature/checksum looks good
+1
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Forrest Xia wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jul 5, 2012, at 9:27 PM, Forrest Xia wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Kevan Miller
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Jul 5, 20
+1
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Forrest Xia wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jul 5, 2012, at 9:27 PM, Forrest Xia wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Kevan Miller
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Jul 5, 2012, at 2:23 PM, David Jencks wro
+1
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Forrest Xia wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jul 5, 2012, at 9:27 PM, Forrest Xia wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Kevan Miller
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Jul 5, 2012, at 2:23 PM, David Jencks wro
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Jul 5, 2012, at 9:27 PM, Forrest Xia wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Kevan Miller
> wrote:
> >
> > On Jul 5, 2012, at 2:23 PM, David Jencks wrote:
> >
> > > I'm a little confused by the LICENSE and NOTICE in the sour
On Jul 5, 2012, at 9:27 PM, Forrest Xia wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Jul 5, 2012, at 2:23 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
> > I'm a little confused by the LICENSE and NOTICE in the source. I've been
> > telling people for years that these should apply t
All looked good to me. Signature/checksum, RAT, build, license/notice, tests…
+1
--kevan
On Jul 3, 2012, at 7:19 PM, Forrest Xia wrote:
> Hi Devs,
>
> With correction of repositoryList URL, here we have the 3rd release candidate
> for vote. Please help vote at your earliest convenient time.
>
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Jul 5, 2012, at 2:23 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
> > I'm a little confused by the LICENSE and NOTICE in the source. I've
> been telling people for years that these should apply to what is actually
> in the source, however these appear to b
On Jul 5, 2012, at 2:23 PM, David Jencks wrote:
> I'm a little confused by the LICENSE and NOTICE in the source. I've been
> telling people for years that these should apply to what is actually in the
> source, however these appear to be the ones appropriate for the binary
> distros. For ins
+1
I built from the source tar.gz and tried the 3 servers a little bit.
I noticed we seem to be starting a non-bundle:
[ 159] [Active ] [] [ 60]
reference:file:/Users/david/tmp/geronimo/geronimo-3.0.0/t3/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal-3.0.0/repository/org/apache/karaf/org.apache.kar
More votes are welcome
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
> build OK, simple testing OK, +1
>
> On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
>
>> Hi Devs,
>>
>> With correction of repositoryList URL, here we have the 3rd release
>> candidate for vote. Please help vote a
build OK, simple testing OK, +1
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
> Hi Devs,
>
> With correction of repositoryList URL, here we have the 3rd release
> candidate for vote. Please help vote at your earliest convenient time.
>
> *The server code up for vote is:*
>
> https://repos
+1 myself
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
> Hi Devs,
>
> With correction of repositoryList URL, here we have the 3rd release
> candidate for vote. Please help vote at your earliest convenient time.
>
> *The server code up for vote is:*
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content
Hi Devs,
With correction of repositoryList URL, here we have the 3rd release
candidate for vote. Please help vote at your earliest convenient time.
*The server code up for vote is:*
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0.0/geronim
21 matches
Mail list logo