Just for reference, there's this jira:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2811
J-D
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Jason Rutherglen
wrote:
> Running the DataNode inside of an HBase process seems like this could
> be a good option to enable?
>
> Specifically because it would reduce the
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Jason Rutherglen <
jason.rutherg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > My gut is that this would be a maintenance headache
>
> What specifically do you think would cause a problem?
>
Tracking versions for one. Everybody has a different favorite. That is the
nice thing about
> My gut is that this would be a maintenance headache
What specifically do you think would cause a problem?
> Internal management of ZK is already an option (and I don't recommend that
> either, for different reasons)
What are the reasons?
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 7:34 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
>
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Jason Rutherglen <
jason.rutherg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Running the DataNode inside of an HBase process seems like this could
> be a good option to enable?
>
My gut is that this would be a maintenance headache.
> Specifically because it would reduce the number o
Running the DataNode inside of an HBase process seems like this could
be a good option to enable?
Specifically because it would reduce the number of processes on an
HBase instance. Eg, I think one of the barriers to adoption for HBase
in general is the multiple processes management part. Are the
