Any ETA on a 2.0.45 release?
I asked about a month ago and was told real soon (e.g. in a week).
I have to synch to actual released versions and there are a lot of
things in 2.0.45 that are of interest (especially surrounding
mod_auth_ldap).
--
Jess Holle
Apache 2 (2.0.43 and 2.0.44 at least) ignores attempts to set the send
buffer size on a socket in apr_socket_opt_set
apr/network_io/win32/sockopt.c.
Addition of:
case APR_SO_SNDBUF:
if (setsockopt(sock->socketdes, SOL_SOCKET, SO_SNDBUF,
(void *)&on,
sizeof(int))
There were mutterings that Apache 2.0.45 would be following shortly
after 2.0.44. It's now been a bit, and I'm left wondering: what is the
release timeframe for 2.0.45?
--
Jess Holle
Graham Leggett wrote:
Greg Stein wrote:
Some questions for thought: if we start banging out versions right
and left,
then will people actually upgrade? Are we doomed to live with 1.3
forever?
Or do we have to stick with today's architecture to support binary
compatibility for N years?
I thi
I know at least for 2.0.43 on Windows you can avoid these issues by
making the mod_ssl project separately and then doing a "Build
(Selection Only)" on the BuildBin and InstallBin targets. [Assuming
you're building via the Dev Studio GUI.]
Also note that if you do a "Clean" on everything you'l
Andre Schild wrote:
>Hello,
>
>finaly I got the module compiled and running under w2k.
>
>Here the steps required to get it working:
>
>1. put the two dsp files from the attachement in the experimental
>folder
>2. the netscape/iplanet ldap libraries are installed in srclib\ldap
>3. Apply the util
Andre Schild wrote:
>Did you compile mod_auth_ldap as one module, and util_ldap as the second
>one ?
>
Yes.
>If yes, how did you resolve the missing exports from util_ldap to be
>able to link mod_auth_ldap.
>
I created a .def file as per the attachment on my previous post and
included it in the
Hmmm... . mod_ldap and mod_auth_ldap were working fine for me at 2.0.40
-- once my patch was applied to util_ldap_cache.c (before which it crashed
due to unintialized memory). This patch was in before things were moved
back into experimental
Günter Knauf wrote:
Hi Andre,
he
Holle
Jess M. Holle wrote:
> I did it with 2.0.40 (using the Netscape/iPlanet SDK), but have not
> yet done it with 2.0.43.
>
> What seems to be the sticking point? I seem to recall that it was
> actually rather straight-forward (at least as far as MSVC++ projects
> go) once
Günter Knauf wrote:
Hi Andre,
What seems to be the sticking point? I seem to recall that it was
1. where do I see if my APR has the ldap support included ? (I assume
it hasn't)
copy the file ./srclib/apr-util/include/apr_ldap.hnw to apr_ldap.h (or
I did it with 2.0.40 (using the Netscape/iPlanet SDK), but have not yet
done it with 2.0.43.
What seems to be the sticking point? I seem to recall that it was
actually rather straight-forward (at least as far as MSVC++ projects go)
once I manually created the APR ldap include files as this di
Do the LDAP authentication modules build on AIX yet?
At 2.0.40 I could not get the httpd-ldap sub-project to build on AIX -- despite
getting it to build just fine on Solaris and Windows
Correction -- the module built on AIX, but would not load on startup.
--
Jess Holle
P.S. It took a f
I recently ran into an issue with non-ASCII user names in LDAP-based authentication
-- both via the Apache 1.3.x auth_ldap module from www.rudedog.org and with
the httpd-ldap sub-project for Apache 2.0.x.
This issue is rather nicely documented in:
http://www.rudedog.org/pipermail/auth_ldap/200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 09:51:20AM -0500, Jess M. Holle wrote:
It would be nicest of all to have builds of each version of the core for
each platform -- and pluggable binaries of all the extra modules for
each version/platform as well.
Eergh.. this
It would be nicest of all to have builds of each version of the core for
each platform -- and pluggable binaries of all the extra modules for each
version/platform as well. This could be cranked out by automated scripts
as a release criteria/requirement, i.e. it's not a release until everythin
ue, 27 Aug 2002, Jess M. Holle wrote:
Ian Holsman wrote:
Jess M. Holle wrote:
Both Apache 1.3.x and 2.0.x suffer a severe perfomance issue when the
server is on Windows and the client is Solaris (and perhaps others).
Before you stop reading this as
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> At 11:54 AM 8/29/2002, Jess M. Holle wrote:
>
>> Jason Kissinger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) responded:
>>
>>> Windows clients hitting Solaris servers does not exhibit this
>>> problem. Only Solaris clients hitting Windows servers. I&#
clients hitting Windows servers. I'm unsure if other UN*X
have this problem, Linux and Windows does not. And Solaris client
hitting anything but Windows works fine. We have some HP/UX boxes that
I could build wget on to test as clients, if that would be helpful.
Jess M. Holle wrote:
>
Really?
I've built mod_jk v1.2.0 (i.e. from jtc 4.0.4 sources) against 2.0.40 on
Windows, Solaris, and AIX (and HP provides one for 2.0.39 on HPUX, but hasn't
gotten to 2.0.40 last I saw) -- though on AIX I had crashes until Jeff Trawick
helped me navigate the insanity of AIX linking (which th
Graham Leggett wrote:
> Jess M. Holle wrote:
>
>> I also find the current 'httpd-ldap' sub-project status lamentable --
>> though at least at 2.0.40 it builds (but has to be patched to run on
>> Windows!) and includes instructions for making it part of your A
I also find the current 'httpd-ldap' sub-project status lamentable --
though at least at 2.0.40 it builds (but has to be patched to run on
Windows!) and includes instructions for making it part of your Apache 2
build process (on UNIX).
The lack of MSVC++ projects on Windows (which www.rudedog.
Has anyone gotten the Apache 2 httpd-ldap sub-project modules to *work*
(not just build) on AIX?
I tried with Apache 2.0.40 and the mod_ldap.so still won't load and it
won't tell me why not
[Overall, Apache 2 is a bear on AIX -- given gcc symbol shuffling
exercises and libtool issues.]
-
t;Were IIS and Tomcat on the same windows hardware as
>the Apache httpds? Are you seeing network issues
>(e.g.- rexmits) -- you might have them everywhere, but
>your Solaris may not be configured well (ndd,MTU,etc).
>
>--cw
>
>-----Original Message-
>From: Jess M.
Ian Holsman wrote:
Jess M. Holle
wrote:
Both Apache 1.3.x and 2.0.x suffer a severe perfomance
issue when the server is on Windows and the client is Solaris (and perhaps
others).
Before you stop reading this as simply "we know Windows does not perform
well", I should poin
Both Apache 1.3.x and 2.0.x suffer a severe perfomance issue when the server
is on Windows and the client is Solaris (and perhaps others).
Before you stop reading this as simply "we know Windows does not perform
well", I should point out that this does not occur when the client is Windows
or L
Has anyone gotten the Apache httpd-ldap sub-project modules to load into
Apache 2.0 on AIX?
I've gotten them to build just fine (and gotten them to run just fine on
Windows [after a patch] and Solaris), but I Apache (2.0.40) fails to
load mod_ldap.so on AIX.
I'm only getting the "Syntax error
The Apache 2 modules in the httpd-ldap sub-project (which should be moved
into 'experimental' in my opinion and have standard MSVC++ projects created,
etc -- though I have no vote) crash on Windows 2000 in Apache 2.0.40. [Yes,
I'll file a bug as appropriate.]
The issue is use of uninitialized
27 matches
Mail list logo
