Re: File attachments...

2005-04-26 Thread Nathanael Noblet
On Apr 25, 2005, at 9:22 AM, Ivan Barrera A. wrote: .scr files are usually windows screensaver files (exe files with another extension). Most probably they are virus/worms/trojan , etc. If they are bounced to you, as if you were sending them, it is because someone with windows (outlook probably)

File attachments...

2005-04-25 Thread Nathanael Noblet
Hello, Just curious, is there any reason someone on this list would intentionally attach a file with a .scr ending? Periodically I get the ezmlm program emailing me and complaining that sometimes my address bounces messages back. I've looked and it is because they contain files with the .scr e

Http/APR

2005-03-21 Thread Nathanael Noblet
Hello, Just wondering, if I install APR 1.X and then attempt to compile apache 2.0.X, can it use the newer APR? or does it use the built in 0.9.X version of apr? -- Nathanael D. Noblet Gnat Solutions 204 - 131 Gorge Road E Victoria, BC V9A 1L1 T 250.385.4613 C 250.893.4613 http://www.gnat.ca/

Re: People still using v1.3 - finding out why

2004-11-18 Thread Nathanael Noblet
On Nov 18, 2004, at 12:16 PM, Ivan Ristic wrote: Jim Jagielski wrote: A can think of 4 big reasons, two from a developer standpoint and two from an admin. developer: 1. Builds and compiles in a minute, rather than several. This means you can play around and develop more and compile

Re: People still using v1.3 - finding out why

2004-11-18 Thread Nathanael Noblet
On Nov 18, 2004, at 11:43 AM, Graham Leggett wrote: Hi all, I've been keen to do some digging for reasons why someone might need to install httpd v1.3 instead of v2.0 or later. Support for mod_backhand seems to be a significant reason (and getting backhand ported to v2.0 would be a win): Apart f

Re: Apr array functions

2004-11-08 Thread Nathanael Noblet
On Nov 8, 2004, at 5:50 PM, Cliff Woolley wrote: Btw: didn't notice ahead of time that this discussion was on [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Oh well. I didn't know there was one specifically for that, I had noticed a good deal of message dealing with APR so figured it would be as

Apr array functions

2004-11-08 Thread Nathanael Noblet
Any reason there is no function like: APR_DECLARE(void *) apr_array_get_element(aprt_array_header_t *arr, int index) { if(apr_is_empty_array(arr)) { return NULL; } if(index > arr->nelts) { return NULL; } if(index == 0) { return arr->elts; } return arr->elts+(arr->elt_size

Re: module filter vs handler

2004-10-22 Thread Nathanael Noblet
On Oct 22, 2004, at 12:11 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: At 01:54 PM 10/22/2004, Nathanael Noblet wrote: Is there another place to discuss 3rd Party modules? the modules list given on the http://httpd.apache.org/lists.html doesn't exist anymore? Did you try [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: module filter vs handler

2004-10-22 Thread Nathanael Noblet
On Oct 22, 2004, at 10:58 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: At 11:43 AM 10/22/2004, Nathanael Noblet wrote: Quick question Can/Should something be designated as a filter AND a handler? For example the filter would pre-process the request such as POST data etc. The handler would work on what

module filter vs handler

2004-10-22 Thread Nathanael Noblet
Quick question Can/Should something be designated as a filter AND a handler? For example the filter would pre-process the request such as POST data etc. The handler would work on what the filter setup? Or do I completely not understand the Apache module struct? Is there another place to discu

POST data input filter questions.

2004-10-21 Thread Nathanael Noblet
Hello, I apologize in advance if I'm in the wrong place. I have searched through the documentation provided through httpd.apache.org and the 2.0 (doxygen) API. Plus many of the examples. I'm interested in implementing a module. I realize that this isn't the best place to ask, but the modules l