Hi Andy,
yes, my last update was 6 days ago following my mail from 16/07, where I inform
that I finished the implementation in all engine modes.
As I need to do a lot of tests, I use a local clone of Jena for developing.
When I finish any step, I put in the repository the “clean” code (Cleaned
So how's it going? I was asking because the repo does not seem to have
changed in 6 days - ie. since before your email on 22/July
Andy
On 24/07/14 14:37, Miguel Bento Alves wrote:
Hi Andy,
yes, the repo is updated.
Miguel
On 24 Jul 2014, at 14:15, Andy Seaborne wrote:
Miguel,
I
Hi Andy,
yes, the repo is updated.
Miguel
On 24 Jul 2014, at 14:15, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> Miguel,
>
> Is github.com/mbentoalves/jena up-to-date?
>
> Andy
>
>
> On 22/07/14 12:45, Miguel Bento Alves wrote:
>> Hi Andy,
>>
>> in a first glance, the problem stated in my email of 16/Ju
Miguel,
Is github.com/mbentoalves/jena up-to-date?
Andy
On 22/07/14 12:45, Miguel Bento Alves wrote:
Hi Andy,
in a first glance, the problem stated in my email of 16/July is a non-issue.
However, I will see again. I have some doubts if a SPARQL command can produce
new data that can
Hi Andy,
in a first glance, the problem stated in my email of 16/July is a non-issue.
However, I will see again. I have some doubts if a SPARQL command can produce
new data that can be false when new deductions are performed. I will deepen my
study and, if necessary, prepare a show case.
My
On 19/07/14 00:10, Miguel Bento Alves wrote:
Hi All,
I did a new update in my repository (https://github.com/mbentoalves/jena). I
implemented Sparql commands in rules in hybrid and forward mode. Now, we can
define sparql commands in rules in all engine modes (backward, forwardRETE,
hybrid, fo
Hi All,
I did a new update in my repository (https://github.com/mbentoalves/jena). I
implemented Sparql commands in rules in hybrid and forward mode. Now, we can
define sparql commands in rules in all engine modes (backward, forwardRETE,
hybrid, forward). Rules with a sparql command only can h
Hi All,
I updated again in my repository (https://github.com/mbentoalves/jena). In this
version, I implemented Sparql commands in rules in forwardRETE mode. Now, I
will work in the others modes (hybrid and forward). Only after that I will try
to hook sparql commands with rules terms in a rule.
Hi All,
I updated my repository (https://github.com/mbentoalves/jena). I implemented
Sparql commands in rules in backward mode. For now, rules with a sparql command
only can have 1 body term, the sparql command himself. My next step will be do
the same for the forward mode. After that, I will
