Re: Request for Participation: The Right Metrics for the Right Project

I would be willing to learn, and then creating the scripts to run in a cron task. However, I would only have some time next week... On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 3:38 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > On 01/23/2018 06:35 PM, Rafael Weingärtner wrote: > > hmmm... I am afraid that I do

Re: Request for Participation: The Right Metrics for the Right Project

On 01/16/2018 09:43 PM, Robert Munteanu wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 2017-11-27 at 19:26 +0100, Daniel Gruno wrote: >> Hi there, fellow Apache projects! >> >> The Apache Kibble project serves as a practical implementation of >> metrics deemed to be helpful for open source projects trying to >>

Re: Request for Participation: The Right Metrics for the Right Project

Hi, On Mon, 2017-11-27 at 19:26 +0100, Daniel Gruno wrote: > Hi there, fellow Apache projects! > > The Apache Kibble project serves as a practical implementation of > metrics deemed to be helpful for open source projects trying to > understand where their project is, was, and is headed. > > As

Re: Request for Participation: The Right Metrics for the Right Project

On 2018/01/09 18:05:39, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Thanks Guys, > > Works perfectly :) Great to hear :) As for SVN, it's a difficult thing to scan, so there is no support for it yet. SVN also lacks a proper committer/author scheme, so the results are not easy to

Re: Request for Participation: The Right Metrics for the Right Project

Awesome! I have invited Jacques now. I used his apache email account *jler...@apache.org * On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 1:04 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > On 01/09/2018 12:40 PM, Rafael Weingärtner wrote: > > Ah, so you created your own user. You are not using

Re: Request for Participation: The Right Metrics for the Right Project

Le 09/01/2018 à 12:40, Rafael Weingärtner a écrit : Ah, so you created your own user. You are not using the guest user? Ah right, got the same way than with snoot.io I am still not able to do this process there. someone would need to add you as a user into Apache org there. OK no hurry, I'll

Re: Request for Participation: The Right Metrics for the Right Project

Ah, so you created your own user. You are not using the guest user? I am still not able to do this process there. someone would need to add you as a user into Apache org there. On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 9:37 AM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Thanks Rafael, > > But I

Re: Request for Participation: The Right Metrics for the Right Project

Thanks Rafael, But I can't (permission) add them either using my @a.o address or my main own Jacques Le 09/01/2018 à 12:15, Rafael Weingärtner a écrit : OFBIZ's SVN was not added. However, we added Github repositories: https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework.git

Re: Request for Participation: The Right Metrics for the Right Project

OFBIZ's SVN was not added. However, we added Github repositories: https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework.git https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-plugins.git https://github.com/apache/ofbiz.git I am not sure if the integration with SVN is working... On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 9:12 AM, Jacques Le Roux

Re: Request for Participation: The Right Metrics for the Right Project

Hi Daniel, When I try to add the trunk svn sources to the OFBiz view I created it says I can't despite using my @a.o address How to add myself to an organisation? At https://demo.kibble.apache.org/organisations.html?page=org I get "You don't seem to belong to any organisations just yet."

Re: Request for Participation: The Right Metrics for the Right Project

On 12/20/2017 01:58 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > On 2017-12-19 14:14, Rafael Weingärtner wrote: >> Done! > > Thank you! > >> These were the sources I added. If I missed something, please do not >> hesitate to tell me. > > The *sling* repositories are not

Re: Request for Participation: The Right Metrics for the Right Project

On 2017-12-19 14:14, Rafael Weingärtner wrote: > Done! Thank you! > These were the sources I added. If I missed something, please do not > hesitate to tell me. The *sling* repositories are not part of the "Apache Commons" project. Why do you go through

Re: Request for Participation: The Right Metrics for the Right Project

Done! These were the sources I added. If I missed something, please do not hesitate to tell me. GitHub repo(s): https://github.com/apache/commons-logging.git https://github.com/apache/commons-email.git https://github.com/apache/commons-validator.git

Re: Request for Participation: The Right Metrics for the Right Project

ok, I will do that. On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > On 12/04/2017 12:41 PM, Rafael Weingärtner wrote: > > So, should we wait a bit more before adding Apache commons? > > How about if we hold off for 3-4 days, and if we haven't hit >150ish > sources by

Re: Request for Participation: The Right Metrics for the Right Project

On 12/04/2017 12:41 PM, Rafael Weingärtner wrote: > So, should we wait a bit more before adding Apache commons? How about if we hold off for 3-4 days, and if we haven't hit >150ish sources by then, we can add them? > > On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote: >

Re: Request for Participation: The Right Metrics for the Right Project

So, should we wait a bit more before adding Apache commons? On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > On 12/03/2017 12:25 PM, Rafael Weingärtner wrote: > > Gilles, I actually do not know the reason behind this limit on data > > sources. I am fairly new to

Re: Request for Participation: The Right Metrics for the Right Project

On 12/03/2017 12:25 PM, Rafael Weingärtner wrote: > Gilles, I actually do not know the reason behind this limit on data > sources. I am fairly new to kibble project. Let´s see what Daniel or others > have to say about this limit. The limit is somewhat arbitrary, but we would favor smaller

Re: Request for Participation: The Right Metrics for the Right Project

Hi. On 2017-12-02 21:27, Rafael Weingärtner wrote: > How should I handle adding apache commons? > > If I add all of the sources we will go over the limit of 100 sources. In > Github there are 72 projects, and on Jira there other 70+ projects. A lot of projects,

Re: Request for Participation: The Right Metrics for the Right Project

I'll also note, that if people create their own accounts, please let us know at the kibble project, so we can add you to the demo organisation on the demo - otherwise you won't be able to see much :) On 12/02/2017 12:24 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > On 12/02/2017 01:33 AM, Denis Magda wrote: >> +

Re: Request for Participation: The Right Metrics for the Right Project

On 12/02/2017 01:33 AM, Denis Magda wrote: > + Ignite dev > > Rafael, > > That’s a really useful project. I would use it for Ignite metrics analysis. > > How do you measure the pony-factor (contributors/committers breakdown per > specific organization)? You can read an article on the original

Re: Request for Participation: The Right Metrics for the Right Project

+ Ignite dev Rafael, That’s a really useful project. I would use it for Ignite metrics analysis. How do you measure the pony-factor (contributors/committers breakdown per specific organization)? Is there a way to see user/dev list specific metrics such as most active participants (senders

Re: Request for Participation: The Right Metrics for the Right Project

Hello. On 2017-11-27 19:26, Daniel Gruno wrote: > [...] > > PS: Please note, we have limited capacity for these tests. We cannot > have every single ASF project in the demo, and we reserve the rights to > pick the projects that can participate, should we get a lot of

Re: Request for Participation: The Right Metrics for the Right Project

ComDev mailing lists and Jira added. On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > On 11/30/2017 02:48 PM, Rafael Weingärtner wrote: > > Regarding the addition of ComDev to Kibble experiment, > > I found ComDev Jira page:

Re: Request for Participation: The Right Metrics for the Right Project

On 11/30/2017 02:48 PM, Rafael Weingärtner wrote: > Regarding the addition of ComDev to Kibble experiment, > I found ComDev Jira page: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMDEV > > The mailing lists are: > https://lists.apache.org/list.html?d...@community.apache.org >

Re: Request for Participation: The Right Metrics for the Right Project

Hi Myrle, I will add these source for Fineract: GitHub repo(s): https://github.com/apache/fineract.git https://github.com/apache/fineract-site.git Mailing lists: https://lists.apache.org/list.html?u...@fineract.apache.org https://lists.apache.org/list.html?d...@fineract.apache.org Jira:

Re: Request for Participation: The Right Metrics for the Right Project

Hi Denis, Can you confirm the Apache Ignite information? so I can add it GitHub repo(s): https://github.com/apache/ignite.git Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE Mailing lists: https://lists.apache.org/list.html?u...@ignite.apache.org

Re: Request for Participation: The Right Metrics for the Right Project

On 11/27/2017 08:15 PM, Rafael Weingärtner wrote: > What about testing this on Apache CloudStack (ACS) folks? > > Kibble fellows, what would you require from us to start analyzing ACS code > base? See my previous email on dev@kibble. > > Are the dashboards public visible? Is it possible to

Re: Request for Participation: The Right Metrics for the Right Project

Hi I'd be keen for ComDev to participate too. ComDev is a bit different from other projects and I'd be interested in things like identifying new contributors, seeing how people move on to participate in other ASF projects (and vice versa where people established in other projects join

Re: Request for Participation: The Right Metrics for the Right Project

Hi Daniel, Is there an easy way to hook Kibble with Ignite? We’re definitely interested in such capabilities. — Denis > On Nov 27, 2017, at 10:26 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > > Hi there, fellow Apache projects! > > The Apache Kibble project serves as a practical

Re: Request for Participation: The Right Metrics for the Right Project

What about testing this on Apache CloudStack (ACS) folks? Kibble fellows, what would you require from us to start analyzing ACS code base? Are the dashboards public visible? Is it possible to integrate with Sonar, Coverity or other code analysis tool, so we can gather information regarding