paste fix just
> backported to branch_6_4 but happy to revert if there were to be any
> concerns about it.
>
> Thanks,
> Christine
>
> From: ichattopadhy...@gmail.com At: 02/21/17 18:05:35
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> Cc: Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON)
> Subject: Re:
/ LONDON)
Subject: Re: 6.4.2 release?
I would like to volunteer for this 6.4.2 release. Planning to cut a RC as soon
as blockers are resolved.
One of the unresolved blocker issues seems to be LUCENE-7698 (I'll take a look
to see if there are more). If there are more issues that should be part o
Thanks Steve for the guidance!
Since LUCENE-7676 and SOLR-10083 were both (unreleased) 6.5.0 to 6.4.2
backports I have gone ahead and moved the CHANGES.txt entries on both branch_6x
and master (after the branch_6_4 commit itself).
My plan for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10192 is
Hi Christine,
> On Feb 22, 2017, at 5:10 AM, Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON)
> wrote:
>
> What process do people typically follow w.r.t. updating CHANGES.txt on
> branch_6x and master in those circumstances e.g. do the entries move from the
> 6.5 to the 6.4.2 section or are they dupli
browse/SOLR-10083>
>> Fix instanceof check in ConstDoubleSource.equals
>>
>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7676
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7676>
>> FilterCodecReader to
;
>> FilterCodecReader to override more super-class methods
>>
>> The former had narrowly missed the 6.4.1 release.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Christine
>>
>> From: dev@lucene
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7676
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7676>
>> FilterCodecReader to override more super-class methods
>>
>> The former had narrowly mi
rowly missed the 6.4.1 release.
Regards,
Christine
From: dev@lucene.apache.org
<mailto:dev@lucene.apache.org> At: 02/15/17 14:27:52
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re:6.4.2 release?
Hi devs
ps://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7676
>> FilterCodecReader to override more super-class methods
>>
>> The former had narrowly missed the 6.4.1 release.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Christine
>>
>> From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: 02/15/17 14:27:52
hristine
>
> From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: 02/15/17 14:27:52
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re:6.4.2 release?
>
> Hi devs,
>
> These two issues seem serious enough to warrant a new release from
> branch_6_4:
> * SOLR-10130: Serious performance degradation in So
former had narrowly missed the 6.4.1 release.
Regards,
Christine
From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: 02/15/17 14:27:52
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re:6.4.2 release?
Hi devs,
These two issues seem serious enough to warrant a new release from
branch_6_4:
* SOLR-10130: Serious performance degra
-class methods
>
> The former had narrowly missed the 6.4.1 release.
>
> Regards,
>
> Christine
>
> From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: 02/15/17 14:27:52
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re:6.4.2 release?
>
> Hi devs,
>
> These two issues seem serious
missed the 6.4.1 release.
Regards,
Christine
From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: 02/15/17 14:27:52
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re:6.4.2 release?
Hi devs,
These two issues seem serious enough to warrant a new release from branch_6_4:
* SOLR-10130: Serious performance degradation in Solr 6.4.1 due
13 matches
Mail list logo