Re: MJAVADOC-116: is "won't fix" the best solution?

2008-07-30 Thread Antonio Petrelli
2008/7/30 Vincent Siveton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Done Great, thanks a lot :-) So it's MNG-3283 the real problem... Thanks again and sorry for the (unintended) rudeness. Antonio - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For add

Re: MJAVADOC-116: is "won't fix" the best solution?

2008-07-30 Thread Vincent Siveton
Done Cheers, Vincent 2008/7/30 Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 2008/7/30 Vincent Siveton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> I understand your arguments but this issue is due to >> @requiresDependencyResolution tag. >> It is more a core problem than a plugin issue. > > Thank you Vincent, but then wh

Re: MJAVADOC-116: is "won't fix" the best solution?

2008-07-30 Thread Antonio Petrelli
2008/7/30 Vincent Siveton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I understand your arguments but this issue is due to > @requiresDependencyResolution tag. > It is more a core problem than a plugin issue. Thank you Vincent, but then why don't you open a new issue for the core, and let MJAVADOC-116 depend on this o

Re: MJAVADOC-116: is "won't fix" the best solution?

2008-07-30 Thread Vincent Siveton
Hi Antonio, I understand your arguments but this issue is due to @requiresDependencyResolution tag. It is more a core problem than a plugin issue. BTW we could add a FAQ entry. Any more thoughts? Cheers, Vincent 2008/7/30 Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi all, > sorry to disturb you,

MJAVADOC-116: is "won't fix" the best solution?

2008-07-30 Thread Antonio Petrelli
Hi all, sorry to disturb you, but I sincerely don't like that MJAVADOC-116 has been closed: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MJAVADOC-116 The bug (because it *is* a bug) is still there, and closing it won't hide the problem. Why did you close it? Can you explain the technical difficulties that you h