On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 5:01 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 10:19 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Volker Weber schrieb:
>>>
>>>
Hi,
Leonardo has just deleted the EnumConverter
Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 10:19 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Volker Weber schrieb:
Hi,
Leonardo has just deleted the EnumConverter from the jsf1.1 branch of
commons.
This converter was the reason for me to use a snapshot version in our
prod
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 10:19 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Volker Weber schrieb:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Leonardo has just deleted the EnumConverter from the jsf1.1 branch of
>> commons.
>> This converter was the reason for me to use a snapshot version in our
>> production application.
Volker Weber schrieb:
Hi,
Leonardo has just deleted the EnumConverter from the jsf1.1 branch of commons.
This converter was the reason for me to use a snapshot version in our
production application.
Is it really necessary to have the commons jsf1.1 branch java 1.4 compatible?
I know jsf1.1 is,
Hi,
Leonardo has just deleted the EnumConverter from the jsf1.1 branch of commons.
This converter was the reason for me to use a snapshot version in our
production application.
Is it really necessary to have the commons jsf1.1 branch java 1.4 compatible?
I know jsf1.1 is, but commons is an exten
