Thanks David! I'll use that from now on.
David E Jones wrote:
Adrian,
It's great that you're adding comments to the entity definitions to
clarify these things.
There is a feature in the entity def XML files to help with this, namely
the "description" element that goes under almost any of
Adrian,
It's great that you're adding comments to the entity definitions to clarify
these things.
There is a feature in the entity def XML files to help with this, namely the
"description" element that goes under almost any of the elements in that file, including
the "field" element.
-David
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12522607
]
Si Chen commented on OFBIZ-1210:
I created this order through the ecommerce module:
https://demo1.opentaps.org/orderm
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12522600
]
Si Chen commented on OFBIZ-1214:
I think the form is already pretty crowded, so we should replace the current
estima
I thought this was supposed to be configurable (with an option on the Facility
if I remember the discussion right)?
-David
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: sichen
Date: Fri Aug 24 10:59:04 2007
New Revision: 569467
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=569467&view=rev
Log:
comment out worke
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12522582
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-1210:
--
Si,
I just created the following order from the ecommerce and i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12522578
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-1210:
--
Hmmm,
this could be caused by an issue with permissions; I just
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12522577
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-1214:
--
Si,
what you describe is actually what is implemented.
The issu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato updated OFBIZ-1214:
-
Priority: Minor (was: Major)
Issue Type: Improvement (was: Bug)
> production run
Thinking about it more...
The service call will have to hit the database for each thread message until the first message in
the thread is found - which takes me back to the original point I made: it's going to be
inefficient. It would be better to hit the db once and scoop up all of the message
Let's say you're viewing a screen of recent forum messages, most recent on top. Clicking on a
message of interest takes you to a screen where all the messages in that thread are listed - so you
can see the message of interest in context.
If the first screen is generated from a list of Content G
Is that field really needed? I recommend stepping back and looking at the
process you're trying to do, in real terms of user interaction. From the stuff
here I don't see what that is.
If it's a hypothetical "how would I..." then I recommend making it more
concrete or the problem will be diffi
Al,
Thank you for the reply!
I'm hesitant to add another field that is specific to forums. As David has pointed out,
ownerContentId is intended to be used for security purposes and right now it contains the forum ID -
I don't want to change that.
How about a field named contentGroupId? Then
Adrian,
There are so many things about this that I cannot think of and, hopefully,
David will be able to comment. The InstanceOfContentId field is used in a
mode where content is derived from a template. I don't think that there
would be any conflicts in its use, but I am guessing the right philos
14 matches
Mail list logo
