Re: how to run multiple instance of ofbiz on server

I don't know what you mean by clone web store. Technically, nothing stops connecting two instances to same database. But I don't know it would make any business sense as for me two instances are operated by two different business entities unless they are part of a cluster and that is all togeth

Re: how to run multiple instance of ofbiz on server

Thank you Raj for quick reply. One thing i would like to ask is- is it possible to use the same database for clone web store? Thanks for your suggestions. Ajay.. Raj Saini wrote: > You will need to change various ports in ofbiz-container.xml in > framework/base/config.xml. Look for Technical Se

Re: how to run multiple instance of ofbiz on server

May be this Jacques contribution may help you. http://docs.ofbiz.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=4098 -Bruno 2008/4/16, Raj Saini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > You will need to change various ports in ofbiz-container.xml in > framework/base/config.xml. Look for Technical Setup Guide on wiki to see th

Re: how to run multiple instance of ofbiz on server

You will need to change various ports in ofbiz-container.xml in framework/base/config.xml. Look for Technical Setup Guide on wiki to see the list of ports. Raj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all, I need to run two instances of ofbiz on server. Is it possible? If the answer is yes, then pleas

how to run multiple instance of ofbiz on server

Hello all, I need to run two instances of ofbiz on server. Is it possible? If the answer is yes, then please anyone can guide how to achieve this? I will be very thankful. Ajay

Re: Weird FOP error in the ShipmentManifestReport

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi I had the same error message while experimenting with a few fop-related things. Never got to the bottom of it, but it was related to having Prorate Shipping=Y for the productStore. If you've got Prorate Shipping = Y, try changing it to N and see if

Re: Application menu visibility

+1 Either show all or none. And I think the best approach is to show none. -- Thanks & Regards, Mridul Pathak Senior Manager Enterprise Software Development HotWax Media, Inc. http://www.hotwaxmedia.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Office: +91 - 509.855.4113

Re: Linking OFBIZ to the on-line help system

Jacopo, I have seen that the tag can be used to get something similar without changing the java code. I have put this tag: soon after the opening container tag and the same icon is displayed. Unfortunately the url is relative to ofbiz home but may be with othe tag options we can have absolute u

Re: Application menu visibility

+1 Bruno Busco wrote: A rule of thumb could be "Never display a link that will not take you anywhere". So no menu items at all for not logged in and only the available commands menu items (according to user privileges) for logged in users. -Bruno 2008/4/15, Adrian Crum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: O

Re: Application menu visibility

A rule of thumb could be "Never display a link that will not take you anywhere". So no menu items at all for not logged in and only the available commands menu items (according to user privileges) for logged in users. -Bruno 2008/4/15, Adrian Crum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > OFBiz was set up origin

Re: Application menu visibility

OFBiz was set up originally so that all application menu items were visible, even if the user is logged out. Lately, some developers have made changes so that only the login menu item is visible when a user is logged out. I don't know what the best practice is, or if one has been defined. May

Re: appheaderTemplate vs applicationMenuName

Yes. FTL menu are legacy Bruno Busco sent the following on 4/14/2008 11:04 AM: > Hi, > it seems that the framework let the user use two different ways to build an > application header both writing a .ftl file or a menu in a .xml file. > What is the preferred method for new applications? > Is the m

Re: Application menu visibility

+1 it has been a manpower problem. once someone commits to do it then it will be as someone originally intended it. Bruno Busco sent the following on 4/14/2008 11:00 AM: > Hi, > I was investigating on the reason why the applications menus have each one a > different behaviour regarding the items v

Re: Application menu visibility

Done: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1753 -Bruno 2008/4/15, Bilgin Ibryam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Do someone agree on this? > > > I agree with you. Please feel free to open a Jira issue for it. > I can review/commit. > > > Bilgin > >

[jira] Created: (OFBIZ-1753) All application menu items should be invisible when not logged in

All application menu items should be invisible when not logged in - Key: OFBIZ-1753 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1753 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Improvement

Re: appheaderTemplate vs applicationMenuName

I had a feeling that this was the new trend... Thank you for confirmation! ;-) -Bruno 2008/4/15, Jacopo Cappellato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Apr 14, 2008, at 8:04 PM, Bruno Busco wrote: > > > Hi, > > it seems that the framework let the user use two different ways to build > > an > > applicati

Re: appheaderTemplate vs applicationMenuName

On Apr 14, 2008, at 8:04 PM, Bruno Busco wrote: Hi, it seems that the framework let the user use two different ways to build an application header both writing a .ftl file or a menu in a .xml file. What is the preferred method for new applications? The Widget Way for all the backoffice appl

Re: Application menu visibility

> Do someone agree on this? I agree with you. Please feel free to open a Jira issue for it. I can review/commit. Bilgin