[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1823?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12602551#action_12602551
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-1823:
--
more details please.
> Production run
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1823?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato reassigned OFBIZ-1823:
Assignee: Jacopo Cappellato
> Production run is not being created
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1750?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12602547#action_12602547
]
Bruno Busco commented on OFBIZ-1750:
Adrian,
yes, for sure having it simpled down is a
Production run is not being created
---
Key: OFBIZ-1823
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1823
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Components: manufacturing
Reporter: Saurav Sha
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1820?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12602545#action_12602545
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-1820:
--
more details please
> Not able to cre
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato closed OFBIZ-1821.
Resolution: Invalid
please use the user mailing list for these questions.
> Not able to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12602542#action_12602542
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-1822:
--
It worked for me... could you please p
Errors are encountered in creating new inventory
Key: OFBIZ-1822
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1822
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Components: specialpurpose/hhfac
+1
--
Sumit Pandit
On Jun 5, 2008, at 3:04 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Yes this sounds good to me too
Jacques
From: "Bruno Busco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Wonderfull
Looking forward to having it !!! ;-)
This will let me also define a more granular permissions to
simplify the
in
Not able to understand contorl flow
---
Key: OFBIZ-1821
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1821
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Components: accounting
Reporter: aditi sharma
Not able to create agreement
Key: OFBIZ-1820
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1820
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Components: accounting
Reporter: aditi sharma
Error Fk con
+1
On Jun 5, 2008, at 12:36 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Jun 4, 2008, at 8:13 PM, David E Jones wrote:
On Jun 4, 2008, at 8:35 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to add support for the status for non serialized
inventory items (right now the status is used only for s
Hi community,
I am looking at he current SFA application and encountered a major
problem.
Current status:
account, contact and lead use the find program from the party component.
This program assumes in the SFA application that a party is either a
lead or an account or contactotherwise the s
Thanks to you both and sorry for the trouble.
Regards
Scott
2008/6/5 hansbak1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Thanks for reporting, fixed in : Committed revision 663177.
>
> Regards,
> Hans
>
>
> Eric DE MAULDE wrote:
> >
> > trunk rev663069
> >
> >
> https://192.168.0.40:8443/accounting/control/editPa
I just noticed in a Freemarker template file something like:
${someTimestamp.toString()}
There is a problem with that. Freemarker will call the Timestamp
object's toString() method - which will output the date and time in the
server's time zone and locale, NOT the user's.
It is better to eli
Thanks for reporting, fixed in : Committed revision 663177.
Regards,
Hans
Eric DE MAULDE wrote:
>
> trunk rev663069
>
> https://192.168.0.40:8443/accounting/control/editPaymentApplications?paymentId=10100
>
> :ERROR MESSAGE:
> org.ofbiz.widget.screen.ScreenRenderException: Error rendering sc
Yes this sounds good to me too
Jacques
From: "Bruno Busco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Wonderfull
Looking forward to having it !!! ;-)
This will let me also define a more granular permissions to simplify the
interface for not-so-skilled users.
-Bruno
2008/6/4 Adrian Crum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1750?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12602476#action_12602476
]
Adrian Crum commented on OFBIZ-1750:
Bruno,
I committed portions of your patch (with m
Cool. Thanks for your help!
David E Jones wrote:
On Jun 4, 2008, at 12:47 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
One thing to keep in mind: the way WorkEfforts are designed a single
WorkEffort as a task or whatever can have various sub-WorkEfforts
associated with it.
Then there would have to be code to cr
On Jun 4, 2008, at 12:47 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
One thing to keep in mind: the way WorkEfforts are designed a
single WorkEffort as a task or whatever can have various sub-
WorkEfforts associated with it.
Then there would have to be code to create sub tasks when intervals
are passed. That
On Jun 4, 2008, at 8:13 PM, David E Jones wrote:
On Jun 4, 2008, at 8:35 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to add support for the status for non serialized
inventory items (right now the status is used only for serialized
items).
The idea is to add a new status item for
Wonderfull
Looking forward to having it !!! ;-)
This will let me also define a more granular permissions to simplify the
interface for not-so-skilled users.
-Bruno
2008/6/4 Adrian Crum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> In the screen widgets, you can check permissions with the
> or elements. That's f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1750?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12602405#action_12602405
]
Bruno Busco commented on OFBIZ-1750:
Adrian,
having the URL in the property let us have
David E Jones wrote:
On Jun 4, 2008, at 11:51 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
It appears to me that there is a one-to-one relationship between a
fixed asset maintenance and a work effort to perform the maintenance.
Wouldn't it be better if there was a one-to-many relationship?
Let's say I have a com
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1750?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12602392#action_12602392
]
Adrian Crum commented on OFBIZ-1750:
Bruno,
Thank you for the updated patch - it looks
On Jun 4, 2008, at 11:51 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
It appears to me that there is a one-to-one relationship between a
fixed asset maintenance and a work effort to perform the
maintenance. Wouldn't it be better if there was a one-to-many
relationship?
Let's say I have a company truck fixed a
On Jun 4, 2008, at 8:35 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to add support for the status for non serialized
inventory items (right now the status is used only for serialized
items).
The idea is to add a new status item for "Damaged" inventory (and
maybe "On Hold" for inven
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1750?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bruno Busco updated OFBIZ-1750:
---
Attachment: help_links2.patch
Adrian,
please find in help_links2.patch the implementation of the help
It appears to me that there is a one-to-one relationship between a fixed
asset maintenance and a work effort to perform the maintenance. Wouldn't
it be better if there was a one-to-many relationship?
Let's say I have a company truck fixed asset. I set up two maintenances
for it: oil change eve
In the screen widgets, you can check permissions with the
or elements. That's fine if
you only need to check a single permission to control access to the
entire screen.
Things get complicated when a screen's elements are controlled by more
than one permission. Let's say you have a typical E
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1682?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Awdesh Parihar updated OFBIZ-1682:
--
Attachment: TestWareHouseManagerRole.patch
Followed process mention with issue and Implemented
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 16:56 +0200, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Sounds like a good idea : +1
Yes, for me too. +1
Bilgin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1675?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12602315#action_12602315
]
parimalga edited comment on OFBIZ-1675 at 6/4/08 8:13 AM:
-
This
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1675?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
parimal gain updated OFBIZ-1675:
Attachment: JUnit_receiveInv.patch
This patch includes Test Case for above process related to
seri
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1679?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Awdesh Parihar updated OFBIZ-1679:
--
Attachment: TestCaseForPickingOrder.patch
Followed process given in link
http://docs.ofbiz.or
Sounds like a good idea : +1
Jacques
From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi all,
I would like to add support for the status for non serialized
inventory items (right now the status is used only for serialized
items).
The idea is to add a new status item for "Damaged" inventory (a
Hi all,
I would like to add support for the status for non serialized
inventory items (right now the status is used only for serialized
items).
The idea is to add a new status item for "Damaged" inventory (and
maybe "On Hold" for inventory under inspection); the inventory items
with this
trunk rev663069
https://192.168.0.40:8443/accounting/control/editPaymentApplications?paymentId=10100
:ERROR MESSAGE:
org.ofbiz.widget.screen.ScreenRenderException: Error rendering screen
[component://accounting/widget/PaymentScreens.xml#EditPaymentApplications]:
org.ofbiz.base.util.GeneralExcep
Thanks Scott for the link of Documents.
--
Ashish
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 7:17 AM, Scott Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No problem at all. The docs are very helpful with good examples, these
> ones
> in particular:
> http://groovy.codehaus.org/Collections
> http://groovy.codehaus.org/Control+
No problem at all. The docs are very helpful with good examples, these ones
in particular:
http://groovy.codehaus.org/Collections
http://groovy.codehaus.org/Control+Structures
http://groovy.codehaus.org/Groovy+Truth
http://groovy.codehaus.org/Operators
Regards
Scott
2008/6/4 Ashish Vijaywargiya
Scott,
Thanks a lot for these useful tips.
I'll dig into it and will patch all the issues from my previous work.
I had read only one document on Groovy i.e
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/edu/j-dw-java-jgroovy-i.html.
Now I will spend more time in reading online document.
Although I will dig mo
Hi Jacques,
I sent again emails to Sherlock's office (Le Crédit Lyonnais) and SIPS
office (Atos Origin)
Yesterday, LCL replied me :
"Le service de sécurisation sur Internet Sherlock's commercialisé par LCL
et développé sur la base d'une solution SIPS personnalisée ne peut être
utilisé que
Oops, I meant that an empty string resolves to false
Scott
2008/6/4 Scott Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> donePage = parameters.DONE_PAGE;
> if (!donePage || donePage.length() <= 0) donePage = "viewprofile?party_id="
> + partyId + "&partyId=" + partyId;
> can be
> donePage = parameters.DONE_PAGE ?
Hi Asish
Just a couple more tips :-)
You might have misunderstood what I said about the shortcut for the ternary
operator
sortField = parameters.sort ? parameters.sort : "entryDate";
can just be
sortField = parameters.sort ?: "entryDate";
here is the documentation: http://groovy.codehaus.org/Oper
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1819?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-1819.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Jacques Le Roux
Thanks Nicolas,
Your patch is in trunk rev.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1819?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-1819:
---
Component/s: framework
> CheckDb interface not work for create fkidx
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12602213#action_12602213
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-1791:
+1 for me too
> Update Jetty Container to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1819?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
nicolas malin updated OFBIZ-1819:
-
Attachment: checkDb.patch
> CheckDb interface not work for create fkidx
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1819?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
nicolas malin updated OFBIZ-1819:
-
Attachment: checkDb.path
> CheckDb interface not work for create fkidx
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1819?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
nicolas malin updated OFBIZ-1819:
-
Attachment: (was: checkDb.path)
> CheckDb interface not work for create fkidx
> -
CheckDb interface not work for create fkidx
---
Key: OFBIZ-1819
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1819
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: SVN trunk
Reporter
51 matches
Mail list logo