Re: Automatic Type Conversion for GenericEntity/Value.set (was Re: Revision 703731)

2008-10-14 Thread Adrian Crum
We could add a warning message to the EntityCondition classes (like the one on line 411 of GenericEntity.java), then start checking the logs for the warning messages. -Adrian Scott Gray wrote: Thanks Adrian, I understand the implications now. So what's the next step, should we add type check

Re: Automatic Type Conversion for GenericEntity/Value.set (was Re: Revision 703731)

2008-10-14 Thread Scott Gray
Thanks Adrian, I understand the implications now. So what's the next step, should we add type checking to the EntityConditions and then perhaps only enforce the correct types on some volunteer machines until we can fix a good portion of the problem code and then move it to the trunk? Regards Scot

Re: Automatic Type Conversion for GenericEntity/Value.set (was Re: Revision 703731)

2008-10-14 Thread Adrian Crum
Scott Gray wrote: Ok it makes more sense to me now, conversion needs to take place at a level where the relevant information is still available so doing it on a low level isn't really an option (even though that's been allowed to happen up until now). I guess I was having trouble understanding w

[jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-1982) Artifact info logs cleanup

2008-10-14 Thread Jacques Le Roux (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1982?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-1982. -- Resolution: Fixed Thanks Marco ! The last patch (framework) is in trunk revision: 704697 >

Re: Automatic Type Conversion for GenericEntity/Value.set (was Re: Revision 703731)

2008-10-14 Thread Scott Gray
Ok it makes more sense to me now, conversion needs to take place at a level where the relevant information is still available so doing it on a low level isn't really an option (even though that's been allowed to happen up until now). I guess I was having trouble understanding why we needed to do a

Re: OFBiz Symposium at ApacheCon US 2008

2008-10-14 Thread David E Jones
On Oct 11, 2008, at 9:40 AM, David E Jones wrote: On Oct 10, 2008, at 4:09 AM, Bilgin Ibryam wrote: On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 09:16 +0200, Christian Geisert wrote: David E Jones schrieb: [..] Either way you need to check out the other OFBiz related presentations, training, and BOFs: htt

Re: Revision 703784 (Cross domain session cookie)

2008-10-14 Thread Scott Gray
127.0.0.0 should work fine again after rev. 704678 Thanks Scott 2008/10/15 Adrian Crum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Changing to localhost fixed it - thanks! > > -Adrian > > Scott Gray wrote: >> >> localhost will work but I'm fixing it for ip addresses now, sorry for >> the trouble. >> >> Regards >> Sco

Re: Revision 703784 (Cross domain session cookie)

2008-10-14 Thread Adrian Crum
Changing to localhost fixed it - thanks! -Adrian Scott Gray wrote: localhost will work but I'm fixing it for ip addresses now, sorry for the trouble. Regards Scott 2008/10/15 Adrian Crum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Actually, no. I'm using 127.0.0.0. Should I use localhost instead? -Adrian Scott G

Production run link from order manager

2008-10-14 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi Jacopo, It seems that this link does not exist anymore. Is there another mean ? Thanks Jacques PS : resurrection of an old thread from 2006... From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Anna, the quick answer is yes and no. At now, when the order is created, the product configuration i

Re: Revision 703784 (Cross domain session cookie)

2008-10-14 Thread Scott Gray
localhost will work but I'm fixing it for ip addresses now, sorry for the trouble. Regards Scott 2008/10/15 Adrian Crum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Actually, no. I'm using 127.0.0.0. Should I use localhost instead? > > -Adrian > > Scott Gray wrote: >> >> That's weird, I tested it before enabling it ag

Re: Revision 703784 (Cross domain session cookie)

2008-10-14 Thread Adrian Crum
Actually, no. I'm using 127.0.0.0. Should I use localhost instead? -Adrian Scott Gray wrote: That's weird, I tested it before enabling it again and the problem had gone away. What domain are you accessing ofbiz through? Just plain old localhost? Thanks Scott 2008/10/15 Adrian Crum <[EMAIL P

[jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-1998) PAYMENT SET REF. button is not working correctly because it sets now only the first payment of the cart

2008-10-14 Thread Marco Risaliti (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1998?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marco Risaliti closed OFBIZ-1998. - Resolution: Fixed Fixed in rev. 704645. > PAYMENT SET REF. button is not working correctly becau

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-1998) PAYMENT SET REF. button is not working correctly because it sets now only the first payment of the cart

2008-10-14 Thread Marco Risaliti (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1998?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marco Risaliti updated OFBIZ-1998: -- Attachment: PaymentSetRef.patch First patch for PAYMENT SET REF. > PAYMENT SET REF. button is

[jira] Created: (OFBIZ-1998) PAYMENT SET REF. button is not working correctly because it sets now only the first payment of the cart

2008-10-14 Thread Marco Risaliti (JIRA)
PAYMENT SET REF. button is not working correctly because it sets now only the first payment of the cart --- Key: OFBIZ-1998 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/bro

Re: Revision 703784 (Cross domain session cookie)

2008-10-14 Thread Scott Gray
That's weird, I tested it before enabling it again and the problem had gone away. What domain are you accessing ofbiz through? Just plain old localhost? Thanks Scott 2008/10/15 Adrian Crum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Nothing in my browser is changed. I don't even close the browser window > between v

Re: Revision 703784 (Cross domain session cookie)

2008-10-14 Thread Adrian Crum
Nothing in my browser is changed. I don't even close the browser window between versions. -Adrian BJ Freeman wrote: just to make sure do you have cookies enable for the URL you are using. I have this type of problem, since I have to manually enable cookies for each domain I use. Adrian Crum s

Re: Revision 703784 (Cross domain session cookie)

2008-10-14 Thread BJ Freeman
just to make sure do you have cookies enable for the URL you are using. I have this type of problem, since I have to manually enable cookies for each domain I use. Adrian Crum sent the following on 10/14/2008 10:02 AM: > I've been having problems with the login screen constantly appearing > since

[jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-1997) German translations for product module

2008-10-14 Thread Marco Risaliti (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marco Risaliti closed OFBIZ-1997. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: SVN trunk Fixed in rev. 704590. Markus, I have commited

[jira] Assigned: (OFBIZ-1997) German translations for product module

2008-10-14 Thread Marco Risaliti (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marco Risaliti reassigned OFBIZ-1997: - Assignee: Marco Risaliti > German translations for product module > -

Revision 703784 (Cross domain session cookie)

2008-10-14 Thread Adrian Crum
I've been having problems with the login screen constantly appearing since this revision - meaning I'm logged in, but when I click on various application links I'm required to log in again. I tried a fresh checkout - same problem. If I revert the Revision 703784 changes, the login screen stops

Re: Automatic Type Conversion for GenericEntity/Value.set (was Re: Revision 703731)

2008-10-14 Thread Jacques Le Roux
I mean in a specific log Please let me know if this makes sense From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Maybe we could add an interrupting tool (at different code points if needed) on the demo server which would catch and put in log all points needed to be changed before really changing the

Re: Automatic Type Conversion for GenericEntity/Value.set (was Re: Revision 703731)

2008-10-14 Thread Jacques Le Roux
From: "Adrian Crum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> David E Jones wrote: What I'm proposing is to fix this further up the stack in the GenericEntity.set method instead of lower down. I guess either way we have the two options I mentioned earlier: 1. fail fast(er) by having OFBiz throw an exception 2. try

[jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-1955) Create a party relationship between a new customer and the product store in the eCommerce application

2008-10-14 Thread Jacques Le Roux (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1955?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-1955. -- Resolution: Incomplete > Create a party relationship between a new customer and the product sto

Re: Automatic Type Conversion for GenericEntity/Value.set (was Re: Revision 703731)

2008-10-14 Thread Adrian Crum
David E Jones wrote: What I'm proposing is to fix this further up the stack in the GenericEntity.set method instead of lower down. I guess either way we have the two options I mentioned earlier: 1. fail fast(er) by having OFBiz throw an exception 2. try to auto-convert #1 will result, as Adri

Re: Automatic Type Conversion for GenericEntity/Value.set (was Re: Revision 703731)

2008-10-14 Thread Adrian Crum
Scott Gray wrote: The service event handler, that's what I meant :-) The guess the point I was trying to make was that with so many services being called via the event handler aren't we making a pretty huge exception to the rule that we're trying to enforce? The performFind service would need to

Re: Automatic Type Conversion for GenericEntity/Value.set (was Re: Revision 703731)

2008-10-14 Thread Adrian Crum
In addition, the service event handler has the information needed to perform a proper conversion (locale and time zone). The entity engine does not. -Adrian David E Jones wrote: I wouldn't say that bugs would be "created" by this change, more than existing bugs would be exposed (that are on

[jira] Created: (OFBIZ-1997) German translations for product module

2008-10-14 Thread Markus Studer (JIRA)
German translations for product module -- Key: OFBIZ-1997 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1997 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Improvement Components: product Affects Versions: SV

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-1997) German translations for product module

2008-10-14 Thread Markus Studer (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Markus Studer updated OFBIZ-1997: - Attachment: product-translations-german.diff.zip patch file with german translations for product

Re: Automatic Type Conversion for GenericEntity/Value.set (was Re: Revision 703731)

2008-10-14 Thread Scott Gray
Inline: 2008/10/14 David E Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I wouldn't say that bugs would be "created" by this change, more than > existing bugs would be exposed (that are only visible on certain databases, > etc). You know what I mean though, whatever we call them there is going to be a lot to fi

Re: I think userPrefGroupId field on UserPrefGroupType should be userPrefGroupTypeId, as per conventions

2008-10-14 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi Vikas, I'd prefer to wait, before committing, that the changes are documented Thanks Jacques From: "Vikas Mayur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I think it would be good to document such change. - Vikas On Oct 13, 2008, at 8:36 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hi Vikas, Did not look into detail yet, bu

Re: Automatic Type Conversion for GenericEntity/Value.set (was Re: Revision 703731)

2008-10-14 Thread David E Jones
I wouldn't say that bugs would be "created" by this change, more than existing bugs would be exposed (that are only visible on certain databases, etc). The service engine doesn't actually do automated mapping, is the service event handler that does this for web requests before the actua

Re: Automatic Type Conversion for GenericEntity/Value.set (was Re: Revision 703731)

2008-10-14 Thread Scott Gray
Ok I see your point, thanks for explaining. #1 makes sense but it will be interesting to see how many bugs are created, also doesn't the service engine currently perform automatic conversion without any problems? Regards Scott 2008/10/14 David E Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Oct 13, 2008, at

Re: Automatic Type Conversion for GenericEntity/Value.set (was Re: Revision 703731)

2008-10-14 Thread David E Jones
On Oct 13, 2008, at 10:10 PM, Scott Gray wrote: Inline: 2008/10/14 David E Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Scott, are you referring to the call to PreparedStatement.setString on SQLProcessor line 553? In other words, the difference in the Postgres JDBC driver is that they used to auto-convert