I need to simplify the UI has I described.
To do this I think the Map should contain ALL user permissions, not
restricted to a single application.
Could we think to specific permissions to hide the TabBar options?
I understand that OFBiz UI is designed to have ALL there because at least
everybody
I personally agree, having it working on the example component will be
great.
We could see the complete feature with system and private pages in the
example application and then we will move to other applications.
-Bruno
2008/11/30 Hans Bakker (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>[
> https://issues
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2052?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12651771#action_12651771
]
Hans Bakker commented on OFBIZ-2052:
Hi Bruno,
sounds good, however i also want to mo
Bruno,
I never got around to implementing that idea. I would still like to work on it
though.
-Adrian
--- On Sat, 11/29/08, Bruno Busco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Bruno Busco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Discussion: Permissions Checking Enhancement
> To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
> D
Which revision or version of OFBiz are you using?
-David
On Nov 29, 2008, at 10:36 AM, guo weizhan wrote:
Do you guys use the FindServices? It's seems there is the problem in
createCondition method when using the "IN" operator, the
EntityCondition.makeCondition need a collection as the value
Hi Adrian,
I am thinking to something similar to what you proposed in this thread.
What I would like to do is to simplify the UI to users who should not
perform some operations.
For instance, in the catalog application, when looking to the EditProduct
screen, I would like that the following tabmen
Do you guys use the FindServices? It's seems there is the problem in
createCondition method when using the "IN" operator, the
EntityCondition.makeCondition need a collection as the value when using IN
operatot, but it's always pass the String value to this method, so It's
throw the exception "Messa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrian Crum updated OFBIZ-2066:
---
Attachment: FlexibleStringExpander.patch
Updated patch - previous patch overlooked the substring.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-1935:
---
Attachment: 1935.diff
Hi BIlgin,
I reviewed and tested your patch, for me all is ok. I just
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrian Crum updated OFBIZ-2066:
---
Attachment: (was: FlexibleStringExpander.patch)
> ${env.ofbiz.home} in property files does not ge
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrian Crum updated OFBIZ-2066:
---
Attachment: FlexibleStringExpander.patch
> ${env.ofbiz.home} in property files does not get resolved
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrian Crum updated OFBIZ-2066:
---
Attachment: FlexibleStringExpander.patch
Mridul,
Please try the attached patch and let me know if it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12651718#action_12651718
]
Adrian Crum commented on OFBIZ-2066:
If a particular OFBiz property needs a system prop
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ravindra Mandre updated OFBIZ-2065:
---
Attachment: PasswordValidationCheck.patch
Patch is uploaded with few modifications. thanks to
While working on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2058 I had also an idea about how to deal with OFBiz requirements from
a community POV.
In Open source world there is the well known notion of bounty for feature.
From time to time (rarely) someone offers to pay for a feature he/she n
From: "David E Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Nov 27, 2008, at 10:52 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
3. Convert the existing artifact gathering code to a
screen widget visitor. That would get the artifact gathering
code out of the model widgets and put it where it belongs.
It would probably simplify t
16 matches
Mail list logo
