在 2009-04-15三的 14:23 -0600，David E Jones写道：
> In that particular scene there was the "super-attractive" prospect
> that everyone wanted to go for, and the point was that if all of the
> guys went for her then chances are none of them would "land the deal"
> as it were (she could only pick one
Inline :
Scott Gray wrote:
+1, I have a vision of an OFBiz installation in every home.
Same feelings in my heart as well man . :-).
- Scott Gates ;-)
I like it Mr. Future Gates. :-)
--
Ashish
On 16/04/2009, at 8:23 AM, David E Jones wrote:
On the other hand, I think this sort of co
[+1] Binding: David, Adrian, Anil, Scott, Jacopo
[+1] Non-binding: Sam, Tim, Ashish, Vikas, Bruno, Pranay, Shi, Marco,
Ravindra
[+0]: 0
[-1]: 0
Based on this result (more than 3 binding +1 votes and more +1 than -1
votes) the vote has passed.
In respect for comments about the time, I'll w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2295?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12699526#action_12699526
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-2295:
--
Jacques,
the warning message from Mod
Yes, I guess so too, I will see tomorrow (at least it's somewhere and I will
not forget, which was the point for tonight)
Jacques
From: "David E Jones"
This is a little over the top as it is very certainly not related to the
theme, and really half of these things are not.
While I'm sure we
From: Ryan Foster
No, I don't hate footers ;).
The originally thinking was to give the backend look and feel a more "desktop"
like feeling, where most of the information and
navigation is located in sidebars, file menus, tabs, etc. Following that line of
thinking, maybe we put a "help" link i
This is a little over the top as it is very certainly not related to
the theme, and really half of these things are not.
While I'm sure we would all like these fixed lumping them in here is
not likely to help get that done!
-David
On Apr 15, 2009, at 17:01, "Jacques Le Roux (JIRA)"
wr
From: "Tim Ruppert"
The .ico is up there on ofbiz.apache.org - so Jacques, please feel free to just
fix that one straight away.
I will see that when I wil get a chance
Jacques
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2295?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12699438#action_12699438
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-2295:
Also sometimes on XP using FF3 (a pretty c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2295?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12699437#action_12699437
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-2295:
I18n, if not already done, I did not have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2295?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12699434#action_12699434
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-2295:
There are a lot of warnings of this type i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2295?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12699429#action_12699429
]
Jacques Le Roux edited comment on OFBIZ-2295 at 4/15/09 3:58 PM:
Issue with the new smoothfeather look in OFBiz documentation (Confluence)
-
Key: OFBIZ-2298
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2298
Project: OFBiz
Issue Ty
Thanks Jacopo,
I have modified (generalised) the title and added my requests
Jacques
From: "Jacopo Cappellato"
Hi Jacques,
I think that Jira issues are still the best way also to report/fix
these layout issues; I personally have already filed a new one for
another issue I have noticed (O
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2295?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-2295:
---
Description:
For example, if you submit the following form leaving all the fields empty
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-828?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux reopened OFBIZ-828:
---
As suggested by Si, find another solution for the negative payment in case of
refund (this is spe
Yes I know that indeed
Jacques
From: "David E Jones"
That's basically what it is now. The option has been there for many
years in fact.
-David
On Apr 15, 2009, at 2:09 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Maybe we could use a parameter for that and not by default ?
Jacques
From: "David E Jone
I have implemented most of requested improvements on Payment Gateway
Config into issue OFBIZ-2297.
Could you please take a look at it ?
Thanks
Marco
Il giorno 15/apr/09, alle ore 14:18, Ashish Vijaywargiya ha scritto:
AFAIK you understood it right Marco.
Here is the example for credit card :
Misc improvements on Payment Gateway Config
---
Key: OFBIZ-2297
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2297
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: accounting
+1, I have a vision of an OFBiz installation in every home.
- Scott Gates ;-)
On 16/04/2009, at 8:23 AM, David E Jones wrote:
On the other hand, I think this sort of community-driven software
that is open to commercial use and extension is massively scalable
and someday we could see OFBiz d
That's basically what it is now. The option has been there for many
years in fact.
-David
On Apr 15, 2009, at 2:09 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Maybe we could use a parameter for that and not by default ?
Jacques
From: "David E Jones"
On Apr 15, 2009, at 1:32 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Davi
Yeah, that's an interesting social dynamic. Thanks for mentioning that
Ean.
If I understand right how that applies to us as collaborating service
providers the basic idea is that we don't all go after the same
client, or more generally that the situation will be better for all of
us if
Maybe we could use a parameter for that and not by default ?
Jacques
From: "David E Jones"
On Apr 15, 2009, at 1:32 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
David E Jones wrote:
This was indeed done to help with that, but I think I like it anyway.
The overall effect is that it distinguishes the IDs from othe
Return adjustments do not get refunded unless there is at least 1 line item
---
Key: OFBIZ-2296
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2296
Project: OFBiz
Issu
On Apr 15, 2009, at 1:32 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
David E Jones wrote:
This was indeed done to help with that, but I think I like it anyway.
The overall effect is that it distinguishes the IDs from other
sources,
etc. On the other hand... maybe it's a little ugly?
It's actually quite nice w
Hi Jacques,
I would check it but I didn't know exactly when I can do it, I'm
hoping soon.
Thanks
Marco
Il giorno 15/apr/09, alle ore 18:19, Jacques Le Roux ha scritto:
Hi Marco,
I have seen your last changes on Label Manager and indeed it looks
like finished. I like for instance the pos
David E Jones wrote:
>
> This was indeed done to help with that, but I think I like it anyway.
> The overall effect is that it distinguishes the IDs from other sources,
> etc. On the other hand... maybe it's a little ugly?
It's actually quite nice when you deploy a website on a developer
machine,
This may be a stupid question, but I'm curious if it make sense to use
Cayenne ORM in OFBiz. My understanding is that the Entity Engine is very
flexible now in terms of providing an abstraction layer for OFBiz to
link with different databases and other data sources, but I thought
Cayenne ORM ma
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrian Crum closed OFBIZ-2268.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed, rev 765288.
> Service [indexWorkEffortKeywords] threw an unexpected exceptio
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12699293#action_12699293
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-2268:
--
Could you please list the steps to rec
Hi Jacques,
I think that Jira issues are still the best way also to report/fix
these layout issues; I personally have already filed a new one for
another issue I have noticed (OFBIZ-2295).
Cheers,
Jacopo
On Apr 15, 2009, at 7:04 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi Tim,
Sorry to bother you ag
Hi Tim,
Sorry to bother you again, I take you as the coordinator o this effort, tell me
if I'm wrong
Another one : the styles associate with
*
and
**
are not rendering bullets now. Could it be possible to differentiate simple
indentation with bullet (numbering is working well) ?
BTW do you wa
Hi Marco,
I have seen your last changes on Label Manager and indeed it looks like finished. I like for instance the possiblity to store only
changes relevant to one file now.
I have just a litlle request, could we prevent to override
by
?
I thinks it's do
Yes sure please do Erwan. Did you try it (I mean using OFBiz last revision) ?
Jacques
From: "Erwan de FERRIERES"
Hi all,
as we are going to create a release for OFBiz, what do you thing of
upgrading the libraries included in the project ?
I'm thinking of the poi.jar library which seems to
Hi all,
as we are going to create a release for OFBiz, what do you thing of
upgrading the libraries included in the project ?
I'm thinking of the poi.jar library which seems to be a kind old, and
put the latest stable released.. It will be then easier to integrate
files from the ms office su
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato updated OFBIZ-2268:
-
Priority: Major (was: Blocker)
> Service [indexWorkEffortKeywords] threw an unexpected e
Some messages/errors are not shown in the new smoothfeather layout
--
Key: OFBIZ-2295
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2295
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
AFAIK you understood it right Marco.
Here is the example for credit card :
--
Ashish
mrisal...@libero.it wrote:
Hi to all,
if I understand correctly it's enough to use the encrypt attribute on the
password fields.
for example in PaymentGatewayPayfloPro could be :
Have I understood
>> Hello Marco,
>> Thanks for your wonderful work in this area.
>> I truly appreciate your efforts.
In my initial email I have given thanks to Marco ... and he deserve for
that.
I think you have missed that may be due to your super fast working
style ;0).
I had given thanks to you and
Hi to all,
if I understand correctly it's enough to use the encrypt attribute on the
password fields.
for example in PaymentGatewayPayfloPro could be :
Have I understood correctly ?
Thanks
Marco
>
> On Apr 14, 2009, at 1:57 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>
> > From: "David E Jones"
> >> On Ap
+1
Regards
Ravindra Mandre
David E Jones wrote:
Today is the day we have discussed for a while! A lot of improvements
and fixes have gone in over the last few weeks, but it is important to
remember that the release branch is primarily time-based and is a
"line in the sand" as it were to beg
From: "Adrian Crum"
lol wut?
I knew lol not lol wut, I learn everyday :o)
I thought you were the one who suggested Ubuntu revision conventions.
Yes I'm, only fools don't change their mind ;o)
Let's keep it at 9.04 please.
OK too late, anyway not a big deal
There are more important thi
+1
Marco
>
> Today is the day we have discussed for a while! A lot of improvements
> and fixes have gone in over the last few weeks, but it is important to
> remember that the release branch is primarily time-based and is a
> "line in the sand" as it were to begin the effort of stabilizing a
>
+1
On Apr 14, 2009, at 11:14 PM, David E Jones wrote:
Today is the day we have discussed for a while! A lot of
improvements and fixes have gone in over the last few weeks, but it
is important to remember that the release branch is primarily time-
based and is a "line in the sand" as it we
lol wut?
I thought you were the one who suggested Ubuntu revision conventions. Let's
keep it at 9.04 please. There are more important things to consider.
-Adrian
--- On Wed, 4/15/09, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> From: Jacques Le Roux
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Create Release Branch 2009.04
> To: de
Well tried digression :o)
* 1st point obviously a bug
* 2d too
* I'd like to discuss this point, do you agree we should do it too (I did not
look into code yet)
* Not a bug but IMPO should be in release 9.04 too
BTW I thought about your branch name propostion (200904). Could we not use a such na
Inline
Cheers,
Tim
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
- "Jacques Le Roux" wrote:
> Actually the things that IMO are missing are
> * The ASF copyright and link to a apache.org site
> * Powered by OFBiz and link to ofbiz.apache.org
> * Relea
Good enough, I'll pop that out now.
-David
On Apr 15, 2009, at 1:06 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Please. Let's hold off on that.
My conversation with David made me refer back to the UEL
specification - and I'm pretty sure my recent commit does a better
job of combining UEL syntax with the OF
Actually the things that IMO are missing are
* The ASF copyright and link to a apache.org site
* Powered by OFBiz and link to ofbiz.apache.org
* Release.revision informations
Only the last is mandatory IMO, but I'm not sure about ASF copyright and a link
to OFBiz site would be cool
But maybe t
Please. Let's hold off on that.
My conversation with David made me refer back to the UEL specification - and
I'm pretty sure my recent commit does a better job of combining UEL syntax with
the OFBiz extensions.
I want the UEL integration to work with existing code as much as possible.
Please
50 matches
Mail list logo
