From: "Jacques Le Roux"
From: "Adam Heath"
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Personnally, I see more harms than benefits as time goes by. I think
it's time for a vote.
+1 to remove
Not official, but +1 from me too
If we don't remove it we should at least take care of issues like the
one we just
Bump!
Jacques
From: "Jacques Le Roux"
Also, should we free the comment at
? With Oxygen it's "easy" to handle listitem and orderedlist, I mean I can do
it if needed...
Jacques
From: "Jacques Le Roux"
Hi,
In HELP_WEBTOOLS_selenium.xml. This snippet refers to screen shots that don't
exi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrian Crum updated OFBIZ-3245:
---
Attachment: conversion.patch
Updated patch. The new field-type attribute is called jdbc-data-type.
This is no longer an issue, thanks Adam
Jacques
From: "Jacques Le Roux"
Hi,
I don't know if some of you have tried to clear caches these last times, but it's now very, very, very slow... (more than 10
times,
maybe even more than 100x...)
Jacques
From: "Adrian Crum"
-1
When the main application menu extends below the bottom of the screen,
there is no way to select the hidden items. When you move the mouse
cursor to the bottom, the menu disappears.
Right, this is theo nly drawback I see so far, I have even reopened
https://issues.ap
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3239?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux reopened OFBIZ-3239:
Quoting Adrian on dev ML
{quote}
When the main application menu extends below the bottom of the
From: "Adam Heath"
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Personnally, I see more harms than benefits as time goes by. I think
it's time for a vote.
+1 to remove
Not official, but +1 from me too
If we don't remove it we should at least take care of issues like the
one we just crossed with JavaDoc. Actu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12782780#action_12782780
]
Aswath Satrasala commented on OFBIZ-3261:
-
admin is not removed. It is just the ty
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12782778#action_12782778
]
Sascha Rodekamp commented on OFBIZ-3227:
Hi Bruno, yeah i see the problem, last nig
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12782777#action_12782777
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3261:
Why would we remove admin ?
> DemoRepStor
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Personnally, I see more harms than benefits as time goes by. I think
> it's time for a vote.
+1 to remove
> If we don't remove it we should at least take care of issues like the
> one we just crossed with JavaDoc. Actually, I can't see any other kind
> of issues, so simpl
From: "Jacques Le Roux"
Personnally, I see more harms than benefits as time goes by. I think it's time
for a vote.
If we don't remove it we should at least take care of issues like the one we
just crossed with JavaDoc. Actually, I can't see any
other kind of issues, so simply commenting out J
Personnally, I see more harms than benefits as time goes by. I think it's time
for a vote.
If we don't remove it we should at least take care of issues like the one we just crossed with JavaDoc. Actually, I can't see any
other kind of issues, so simply commenting out JavaDoc targets in /shark/b
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-552.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: Release Branch 4.0)
Adam fixed it at r884347. I
Thanks for the links Scott.
David makes a good point: If it isn't doing any harm, then just leave it in
there - someone might use it. And various people have tried to use it - with
mixed success. I did a Google search, and for the last two years user questions
about the Shark component have bee
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aswath Satrasala updated OFBIZ-3261:
Attachment: DemoRepStore.patch
With attached patch, the DemoRepStore party is given access
DemoRepStore PartyId data not correct
-
Key: OFBIZ-3261
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3261
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Components: specialpurpose/ecommerce
Affects Versi
Buildbot reported a compilation failure for this commit, for some
reason no email was sent: http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/1879
Regards
Scott
On 26/11/2009, at 2:33 PM, doo...@apache.org wrote:
Author: doogie
Date: Thu Nov 26 01:33:38 2009
New Revision: 884363
URL: http://
On 26/11/2009, at 1:47 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
On 26/11/2009, at 1:37 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Adam Heath wrote:
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
I thought it would be easy to compile after some changes. But
obviously
nobody has done this for some time.
It's late here, so I reopened
https://issues.apache
On 26/11/2009, at 1:37 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Adam Heath wrote:
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
I thought it would be easy to compile after some changes. But
obviously
nobody has done this for some time.
It's late here, so I reopened
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-552 and uploaded a
"shar
Adam Heath wrote:
> Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>> I thought it would be easy to compile after some changes. But obviously
>> nobody has done this for some time.
>> It's late here, so I reopened
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-552 and uploaded a
>> "shark.patch" from my current WIP, if so
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> I thought it would be easy to compile after some changes. But obviously
> nobody has done this for some time.
> It's late here, so I reopened
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-552 and uploaded a
> "shark.patch" from my current WIP, if someone wants to give it a
I thought it would be easy to compile after some changes. But obviously nobody
has done this for some time.
It's late here, so I reopened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-552 and uploaded a "shark.patch" from my current WIP, if
someone wants to give it a try...
Jacques
From: "Adri
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-552:
--
Attachment: shark.patch
> Integration Shark 1.1_2 into OfBiz
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux reopened OFBIZ-552:
---
I will soon add a patch from my current WIP trying to compile Shark
> Integration Shark 1.1_2 int
On 26/11/2009, at 12:20 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: "Scott Gray"
On 26/11/2009, at 11:58 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
The reason of all these troubles is that Shark is not compiled
anymore, not Workflow (this answer Adam question).
Do we really need to keep them in trunk ? We may put the
From: "Scott Gray"
On 26/11/2009, at 11:58 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Oops, Sorry
I missed "> 0" when replacing xpdls != null && xpdls.size() > 0 by
UtilValidate.isNotEmpty(xpdls)
Fixed at r884325
Thanks Jacques
The reason of all these troubles is that Shark is not compiled anymore,
Except for it being touched occasionally by project-wide changes, I
haven't seen any work done in the Shark component in years.
-Adrian
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Oops, Sorry
I missed "> 0" when replacing xpdls != null && xpdls.size() > 0 by
UtilValidate.isNotEmpty(xpdls)
Fixed at r884325
The
On 26/11/2009, at 11:58 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Oops, Sorry
I missed "> 0" when replacing xpdls != null && xpdls.size() > 0 by
UtilValidate.isNotEmpty(xpdls)
Fixed at r884325
Thanks Jacques
The reason of all these troubles is that Shark is not compiled
anymore, not Workflow (this
From: "Scott Gray"
On 26/11/2009, at 11:36 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
This came from my commit at r886549 < 0) and (obj
!= null) || (obj.size > 0)>>
I have fixed it the right way.
I'm guessing this occurred because you were using a regex search and replace, they are useful but you have to
Oops, Sorry
I missed "> 0" when replacing xpdls != null && xpdls.size() > 0 by
UtilValidate.isNotEmpty(xpdls)
Fixed at r884325
The reason of all these troubles is that Shark is not compiled anymore, not
Workflow (this answer Adam question).
Do we really need to keep them in trunk ? We may put
jler...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: jleroux
> Date: Wed Nov 25 22:55:29 2009
> New Revision: 884325
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=884325&view=rev
> Log:
> Oops fix r884308 (missed the >0 part when replacing xpdls != null &&
> xpdls.size() > 0 by UtilValidate.isNotEmpty(xpdls)
>
> Mod
On 26/11/2009, at 11:36 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
This came from my commit at r886549 0) and (obj !=
null) || (obj.size > 0)>>
I have fixed it the right way.
I'm guessing this occurred because you were using a regex search and
replace, th
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
So build-website and copy-apis targets are also used by scripts ? I
thought only docs-all was needed ?
I was just guessing, since the folders that weren't found by Contegix
are the same ones you commented out.
-Adrian
Hi Scott,
1st I find Marco's idea very good!
And I'd like to apply it also to languages. Who needs all languages ? Of course
if you use only one language (English ;o) you can't
see that as a drawback, but when you have continuously to change from one
language to English, it can be boring...
So
Can a boolean be compared to an integer or did you just break it again?
Regards
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On 26/11/2009, at 11:29 AM, jler...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jleroux
Date: Wed Nov 25 22:29:21 2009
New Revision: 884308
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=884308
This came from my commit at r886549 < 0) and (obj !=
null) || (obj.size > 0)>>
I have fixed it the right way.
Yes, it's surprising it passes ant run but not ant docs-all
So build-website and copy-apis targets are also used by scripts ? I thought
only docs-all was needed ?
Jacques
From: "Scot
On 26/11/2009, at 11:22 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
lekt...@apache.org wrote:
Author: lektran
Date: Wed Nov 25 22:03:53 2009
New Revision: 884292
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=884292&view=rev
Log:
Fix invalid code that causing the docs-all target to fail
If this code isn't built during a n
lekt...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: lektran
> Date: Wed Nov 25 22:03:53 2009
> New Revision: 884292
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=884292&view=rev
> Log:
> Fix invalid code that causing the docs-all target to fail
If this code isn't built during a normal ant compile run, then the
docs
Right now sleeping giant means not yet committed to the project :)
Definitely looking for this look and feel to make it's way in there
Erik - thanks so much! I'm glad you've found the right avenue for
that style.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Nov 25, 2009, at 2:13 PM, Bruno Busco wrote:
uhao!
Tha
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3212?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12782628#action_12782628
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3212:
I did not spot this one, it should be the
uhao!
That's great!
Now I see what you meant by "sleeping giant" !
-Bruno
2009/11/25 Adam Heath :
> http://www.brainfood.com/ofbizbackend
>
Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
On my local copy I'm seeing thousands of entitycache entries, each with
only one item cached.
That was what I needed to fix it.
When I tested it after Jacques noted the problem, I went to webtools
immediately after starting, so it only had a small list of
Adrian Crum wrote:
> On my local copy I'm seeing thousands of entitycache entries, each with
> only one item cached.
That was what I needed to fix it.
When I tested it after Jacques noted the problem, I went to webtools
immediately after starting, so it only had a small list of entries.
I've fix
INSERT INTO THEME_REVIEW
(THEME_REVIEW_ID, USER_LOGIN_ID, THEME_ID, THEME_RATING, THEME_REVIEW)
VALUES ('1', 'lektran', 'BF_DROPCRMB', 5, 'Looks awesome, would
view again. A');
Regards
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On 26/11/2009, at 9:23 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
http:/
Very, very nice - I see that Erik's still shooting for that ApacheERP
setup that he did years ago. Awesome!
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Nov 25, 2009, at 1:23 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
http://www.brainfood.com/ofbizback
It looks industrial. Nice!
-Adrian
Adam Heath wrote:
http://www.brainfood.com/ofbizbackend
On my local copy I'm seeing thousands of entitycache entries, each with
only one item cached.
-Adrian
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi Adam,
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi,
I don't know if some of you have tried to clear caches these last times,
but it's now very, very, very slow... (more than 10 time
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>
>> Is this after the last set of changes I *just* did?
>
> Yes I think so, but I just saw that you did some changes in util/cache
> are they related to this message ?
Unrelated. I was just backporting changes from head to
our(brainfood's) local package, and noticed some
http://www.brainfood.com/ofbizbackend
Hi Adam,
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi,
I don't know if some of you have tried to clear caches these last times,
but it's now very, very, very slow... (more than 10 times,
maybe even more than 100x...)
Is this after the last set of changes I *just* did?
Yes I think so, but I just saw that you
From: "David E Jones"
On Nov 24, 2009, at 2:49 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: "David E Jones"
On Nov 24, 2009, at 3:51 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi Bilgin,
Just one question
From: "Bilgin Ibryam"
[big snip]
2. There is no way of indicating what field you actually want to search
ag
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't know if some of you have tried to clear caches these last times,
> but it's now very, very, very slow... (more than 10 times,
> maybe even more than 100x...)
Is this after the last set of changes I *just* did?
Note, that if you clear caches from webtools,
Hi,
I don't know if some of you have tried to clear caches these last times, but
it's now very, very, very slow... (more than 10 times,
maybe even more than 100x...)
Jacques
-1
When the main application menu extends below the bottom of the screen,
there is no way to select the hidden items. When you move the mouse
cursor to the bottom, the menu disappears.
In the Bizznesstime theme, the main application menu stays on the screen
until an item is selected.
-Adri
On Nov 24, 2009, at 2:49 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> From: "David E Jones"
>>
>> On Nov 24, 2009, at 3:51 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Bilgin,
>>>
>>> Just one question
>>> From: "Bilgin Ibryam"
>>> [big snip]
>>> 2. There is no way of indicating what field you actually want to
-1 until the licensing and other issues are resolved.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Nov 25, 2009, at 11:40 AM, Scott Gray wrote:
On 26/11/2009, at 1:29 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:
Chattree has fixed the duplicated jar problem.
concerning the license, my opinion is what is good for the eclipse
foundation is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3212?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pierre Smits updated OFBIZ-3212:
Attachment: (was: ProjectMgrUiLabels.patch)
> Improvement of Dutch language file for projectmgr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3212?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pierre Smits updated OFBIZ-3212:
Attachment: ProjectMgrUiLabels.patch
Thanks, Jacques.
My apologies for the mishap. Attached you'll
On 26/11/2009, at 1:29 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:
Chattree has fixed the duplicated jar problem.
concerning the license, my opinion is what is good for the eclipse
foundation is good for Apache. We have a saying here: we should not be
more roman catholic than the pope..
What on Earth are you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12782545#action_12782545
]
Adrian Crum commented on OFBIZ-3245:
Bah. Jira's Wiki markup doesn't work. C&P the tabl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12782544#action_12782544
]
Adrian Crum commented on OFBIZ-3245:
A good example of how the java-type attribute is n
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bruno Busco updated OFBIZ-3227:
---
Attachment: screen3.gif
screen2.gif
screen1.gif
Sorry for the large B
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bruno Busco updated OFBIZ-3227:
---
Attachment: (was: screen2.bmp)
> Drag'n'Drop update - add directly in the my portal application
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bruno Busco updated OFBIZ-3227:
---
Attachment: (was: screen3.bmp)
> Drag'n'Drop update - add directly in the my portal application
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bruno Busco updated OFBIZ-3227:
---
Attachment: (was: screen1.bmp)
> Drag'n'Drop update - add directly in the my portal application
>
Nice!
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Nov 25, 2009, at 11:00 AM, Ean Schuessler wrote:
I haven't tried it yet but it would appear to automate some of our
workflow.
http://github.com/dreiss/git-jira-attacher
--
Ean Sch
I haven't tried it yet but it would appear to automate some of our workflow.
http://github.com/dreiss/git-jira-attacher
--
Ean Schuessler, CTO
e...@brainfood.com
214-720-0700 x 315
Brainfood, Inc.
http://www.brainfood.com
From: "David E Jones"
On Nov 24, 2009, at 3:51 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi Bilgin,
Just one question
From: "Bilgin Ibryam"
[big snip]
2. There is no way of indicating what field you actually want to search
against.
This would typically be a search on whatever the description is made
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12782519#action_12782519
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3260:
Hi Abdullah,
Your patch looks good, but
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12782507#action_12782507
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3227:
Hi Sascha,
It seems that, to say the leas
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3212?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12782504#action_12782504
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3212:
Hi Pierre,
There is at least one issue wi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3212?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux reopened OFBIZ-3212:
Reopened : new improving patch
> Improvement of Dutch language file for projectmgr
> -
Hans Bakker wrote:
> concerning the license, my opinion is what is good for the eclipse
> foundation is good for Apache. We have a saying here: we should not be
> more roman catholic than the pope..
No. You can't just blindly relicense something. That's the whole
point of it being a license.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12782481#action_12782481
]
Adrian Crum edited comment on OFBIZ-3245 at 11/25/09 4:25 PM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12782481#action_12782481
]
Adrian Crum commented on OFBIZ-3245:
I'm sure I am the one who is confused. It appeared
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3212?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pierre Smits updated OFBIZ-3212:
Attachment: ProjectMgrUiLabels.patch
This patch includes enhanced translations for Dutch users. Inc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bruno Busco updated OFBIZ-3227:
---
Attachment: screen3.bmp
screen2.bmp
screen1.bmp
Hi Sascha,
the ESC ke
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bruno Busco reassigned OFBIZ-3227:
--
Assignee: Bruno Busco
> Drag'n'Drop update - add directly in the my portal application
> --
I think we can easily do this once the demo servers are migrated -
which I think that they are on the infrastructure, but not the daily
updates.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Nov 25, 2009, at 6:48 AM, Erwan de FERRIER
Still big (one page) after r884047 :p
Jacques
From: "Jacques Le Roux"
From: "Scott Gray"
Umm... the list is only bigger because one of your commits uncomments a log
statement that had previously been commented:
[java] 2009-11-24 14:05:10,640 (main) [ModelReader.java: 365:INFO ]
E
Le 25/11/2009 14:41, Hans Bakker a écrit :
Have a look at:
http://ofbiz.in.th
http://ofbiz.nl
i have thai and dutch and run on the same website.
anybody who want a copy or want to supply different language files let
me know.
So, I'd like to supply french...
No, we did not progress beca
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sascha Rodekamp updated OFBIZ-3227:
---
Attachment: myPortalDragNDrop_v2.patch
Hi,
+ cloning effect when draging a portlet.
+ ESC p
Have a look at:
http://ofbiz.in.th
http://ofbiz.nl
i have thai and dutch and run on the same website.
anybody who want a copy or want to supply different language files let
me know.
No, we did not progress because the move to the apache infrastructure
has to be done first.
Regards,
Hans
On W
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Abdullah Shaikh updated OFBIZ-3260:
---
Attachment: OFBIZ-3260_Added drop down options replacing text box.patch
> Added drop down opt
Added drop down options replacing text box to configure sagepay
---
Key: OFBIZ-3260
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3260
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Improvement
Hi Hans and all,
At the end of september, you suggested to use OFBiz to manage the OFBiz
website and also to add the multi-langage support in this new website.
I know that you have plenty of work with birt and other things, but have
you progressed on this point ?
Regards,
--
Erwan
As a reminder (I know we had already a discussion about that)
It should be noted that OfbizCurrencyTransform.java uses UtilFormatOut.formatCurrency() which in turn relies on
com.ibm.icu.text.NumberFormat.getCurrencyInstance(locale) to select the right format.
I guess in most cases it's ok. But I
Chattree has fixed the duplicated jar problem.
concerning the license, my opinion is what is good for the eclipse
foundation is good for Apache. We have a saying here: we should not be
more roman catholic than the pope..
so what is the community opinion?
can we merge the addbirt branch back
Beware Bruno, I'm sure if we put it as default you will get some issues like in OFBIZ-2398 ;o) Maybe less though from what I have
seen so far. Ryan's suggestion was good and Adrian's help also...
Jacques
From: "Bruno Busco"
+1 ;-)
2009/11/25 Jacques Le Roux :
Hi,
I wonder if we should no c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12782374#action_12782374
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3107:
Hi Scott,
Done as suggested at r884047
+1 ;-)
2009/11/25 Jacques Le Roux :
> Hi,
>
> I wonder if we should no change the default theme from BIZZNESS_TIME to
> DROPPING_CRUMB.
> I know it will not be consistent anymore with Site and Doc but looking at
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2398 I think DROPPING_CRUMB is
> doing a
Hi,
I wonder if we should no change the default theme from BIZZNESS_TIME to
DROPPING_CRUMB.
I know it will not be consistent anymore with Site and Doc but looking at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2398 I think
DROPPING_CRUMB is doing a better job and has a real good look now
Jacq
From: "Jacques Le Roux"
Thanks Akash,
I did not apply your patch since, as you said, accountLimit is below formated
using ofbizCurrency anyway and just above
?double is used in <#assign accountLimit = billingAccount.accountLimit?double />
So it's ok there.
Actually my demand was not really re
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12782356#action_12782356
]
Bruno Busco commented on OFBIZ-3227:
Sascha,
I tested your last patch and I found that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-3258.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Jacques Le Roux
Thanks Ean,
Your patch has been commited in
Thanks Akash,
I did not apply your patch since, as you said, accountLimit is below formated
using ofbizCurrency anyway and just above
?double is used in <#assign accountLimit = billingAccount.accountLimit?double />
So it's ok there.
Actually my demand was not really related to this commit but a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3151?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12782350#action_12782350
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3151:
Chatree, Scott,
Yes, but what if someone
98 matches
Mail list logo
