David E Jones wrote:
On Jan 2, 2010, at 2:42 PM, Bruno Busco wrote:
One major question is whether framework, on its own, should even be
runnable as an application. In my opinion, it is a library, not an app
and doesn't need to be operational on its own.
The more we discuss about this
On Jan 2, 2010, at 2:42 PM, Bruno Busco wrote:
>> One major question is whether framework, on its own, should even be
>> runnable as an application. In my opinion, it is a library, not an app
>> and doesn't need to be operational on its own.
>
> The more we discuss about this the more I get conv
Those are exactly the type of questions I was writing concurrently Adam -
thanks for bringing them up. My off the cuff response is that this isn't
tomcat or jboss - it runs in the containers, but is not one itself, so what
exactly would the framework do without an application sitting on top of
Those of us with strong Unix backgounds really don't want to see anything named
"core" - so I'd say let's look for some other name. What you're pushing for
Bruno - is much needed and could be a great enhancement to the usage of OFBiz.
Anything that'll make it easier for people to build - non-e
Ean Schuessler wrote:
> Adrian Crum wrote:
>> I don't agree that emailing forgotten passwords is like the Webtools
>> application. As you have discovered, emailing forgotten passwords
>> entails some decision making, looking up information in various
>> entities, selecting and rendering an email bo
> One major question is whether framework, on its own, should even be
> runnable as an application. In my opinion, it is a library, not an app
> and doesn't need to be operational on its own.
The more we discuss about this the more I get convinced that what we
(or at least me) intend for framework
Adrian Crum wrote:
> I don't agree that emailing forgotten passwords is like the Webtools
> application. As you have discovered, emailing forgotten passwords
> entails some decision making, looking up information in various
> entities, selecting and rendering an email body template, etc. From my
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12795868#action_12795868
]
Tim Ruppert commented on OFBIZ-3379:
Read the subject and description of the error - th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12795867#action_12795867
]
Ruth Hoffman commented on OFBIZ-3379:
-
Tim:
Really? And what was that problem? Email wa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12795865#action_12795865
]
Tim Ruppert commented on OFBIZ-3379:
Scott, thanks for taking the extra time to abstrac
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12795864#action_12795864
]
Tim Ruppert commented on OFBIZ-3379:
Ruth, this is a good example of there being a REAL
thank you Bruno
Jacopo
On Jan 2, 2010, at 1:10 PM, Bruno Busco wrote:
> Yes this helps!
> Fixed in trunk At revision: 895179
>
> -Bruno
>
> 2010/1/2 Jacopo Cappellato :
>> Go to:
>> Order --> Order Entry
>> Fill one of the two forms in the screen (one is for sales orders, one is for
>> purcha
Yes this helps!
Fixed in trunk At revision: 895179
-Bruno
2010/1/2 Jacopo Cappellato :
> Go to:
> Order --> Order Entry
> Fill one of the two forms in the screen (one is for sales orders, one is for
> purchase orders), submit the form, you will be propted into a new page,
> submit that form too
Go to:
Order --> Order Entry
Fill one of the two forms in the screen (one is for sales orders, one is for
purchase orders), submit the form, you will be propted into a new page, submit
that form too and you will be in the "shopping cart page"; that page should
have a left bar.
Hope it helps,
Jac
Scott,
if I proposed the BuildBot to be setup to check for the dependencies
is because I do not think that making noise about this is enough.
Framework separation is something we speak about since a lot of time
but no steps have been done because, I guess, it is not a community
high priority, but,
Doesn't the build order prevent this? If one were to try and add a
java dependency from the framework to the applications then the build
would fail would it not?
While it is certainly possible, I'm entirely convinced of the need to
use buildbot for this. The reason buildbot is great for t
Jacopo,
I cannot find the changed screen.
Could you please provide a link ?
I am comparing order entry to the 9.04 and see no differences.
-Bruno
2010/1/2 Jacopo Cappellato :
> Hi Bruno,
>
> the left bar disappeared also from the order entry screens for purchase
> orders; my guess is that it is
This is OK for the runtime but will still make available all the
packages during the build process.
Some unwanted java code dependencies would not be spotted out.
-Bruno
2010/1/2 Jacopo Cappellato :
> Instead of deleting folders the script could set the enabled="false"
> attribute in the ofbiz-c
Hi Bruno,
the left bar disappeared also from the order entry screens for purchase orders;
my guess is that it is a similar issue...
Jacopo
On Jan 1, 2010, at 9:51 PM, bus...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: buscob
> Date: Fri Jan 1 20:51:39 2010
> New Revision: 895074
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.o
Bruno Busco wrote:
> The script should be able to delete some directories and to apply some
> SVN patches (tipically to change component-load.xml and build.xml
> files).
Actually, that's not the best approach. It would be better to modify
the build.xml and java classes to be more extensible, and
Instead of deleting folders the script could set the enabled="false" attribute
in the ofbiz-component.xml files.
Jacopo
On Jan 2, 2010, at 10:27 AM, Bruno Busco wrote:
> Thank you Adam,
> unfortunately I am not familiar with debian packages yet (consider
> that I normally work under Windows).
>
Le 02/01/2010 10:16, Adam Heath a écrit :
er...@apache.org wrote:
Author: erwan
Date: Sat Jan 2 09:01:28 2010
New Revision: 895149
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=895149&view=rev
Log:
Changing the year as we are now in 2010. This corrects buildbot errors reported
on the dev mailing li
Thank you Adam,
unfortunately I am not familiar with debian packages yet (consider
that I normally work under Windows).
In any case, what was my original goal, was to define some script or
whatever that could generate, starting from a fresh complete OFBiz
checkout, a modified OFBiz tree that could
Thanks Erwan,
It's great to see united communities power in action
Jacques
From: "Erwan de FERRIERES"
Hi all,
Le 01/01/2010 22:01, Scott Gray a écrit :
On 1/01/2010, at 1:12 PM, David E Jones wrote:
Is there any way to get more details about this?
Yes, with looking at the JUnit HTML re
er...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: erwan
> Date: Sat Jan 2 09:01:28 2010
> New Revision: 895149
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=895149&view=rev
> Log:
> Changing the year as we are now in 2010. This corrects buildbot errors
> reported on the dev mailing list.
> Some trailing spaces have
The Buildbot has detected a restored build of ofbiz-trunk on ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/2236
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu
Build Reason:
Build Source Stamp: [branch ofbiz/trunk] 8951
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Akash Jain updated OFBIZ-3389:
--
Attachment: OFBIZ-3389.patch
I have uploaded the patch for taking currency in consideration.
> Improv
Improvements in setUnitPriceAsLastPrice &
updateIssuanceShipmentAndPoOnReceiveInventory services to take currency in
consideration
--
Key: OFBIZ-3389
Hi all,
Le 01/01/2010 22:01, Scott Gray a écrit :
On 1/01/2010, at 1:12 PM, David E Jones wrote:
Is there any way to get more details about this?
Yes, with looking at the JUnit HTML results, in
runtime/logs/test-results/html/
A CI server is displaying the results there :
http://selenium.
29 matches
Mail list logo
