This thread is in no way similar to moving a component. I'm suggesting moving a
handful of Java classes to a new package. Unfortunately, what should have been
a discussion about that change has been hijacked into a different discussion
about release strategy and release version compatibility.
-
wading in late,
I believe the idea behind component was that it could be located and
that was transparent. Like ecommerce got moved but it does not effect
the operation of it.
So any idea you have should follow that concept.
Adrian Crum sent the following on 2/19/2010 10:07 PM:
> --- On Fri, 2/19/
Please don't double post questions.
this is handled in the user mailing list
nikunjsurati sent the following on 2/19/2010 9:56 PM:
> Hi to all,
> I am new to apache ofbiz.
>
> I want to run multiple ecommerce websites under one instance of ofbiz.
> For that I am thinking that only ecommerce
Never mind, Vivek sent me a patch and I've applied it in r912081 :-)
Regards
Scott
On 19/02/2010, at 11:10 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
> Hi Ashish,
>
> The view entity definition results in an additional warning (actually info
> but they should probably be changed to warnings) at start up:
> [java]
An additional issue (which is probably related to the menu being exposed during
page load):
If I click on a menu item directly underneath the mega menu (or whatever they
are called) then the mega menu acts in reverse when the new page loads, i.e.
roll over hides it and roll out exposes it.
Step
Hi Ashish,
The view entity definition results in an additional warning (actually info but
they should probably be changed to warnings) at start up:
[java] 2010-02-19 20:58:36,544 (main) [ModelViewEntity.java:690:INFO ]
Throwing out field alias in view entity ContentAssocAndContentPurpose bec
--- On Fri, 2/19/10, Adam Heath wrote:
> From: Adam Heath
> Subject: Re: Discussion: New package org.ofbiz.base.types
> To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
> Date: Friday, February 19, 2010, 9:57 PM
> Adrian Crum wrote:
> > --- On Fri, 2/19/10, Scott Gray
> wrote:
> >
> >> From: Scott Gray
> >> Subject:
Adrian Crum wrote:
> --- On Fri, 2/19/10, Scott Gray wrote:
>
>> From: Scott Gray
>> Subject: Re: Discussion: New package org.ofbiz.base.types
>> To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
>> Date: Friday, February 19, 2010, 9:45 PM
>> On 19/02/2010, at 10:10 PM, Adrian
>> Crum wrote:
>>
>>> --- On Fri, 2/19/10,
Hi to all,
I am new to apache ofbiz.
I want to run multiple ecommerce websites under one instance of ofbiz.
For that I am thinking that only ecommerce component will be hosted with my
website and rest of all the applications of ofbiz like accounting, catalaog
etc will be called by webservice.
--- On Fri, 2/19/10, Scott Gray wrote:
> From: Scott Gray
> Subject: Re: Discussion: New package org.ofbiz.base.types
> To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
> Date: Friday, February 19, 2010, 9:45 PM
> On 19/02/2010, at 10:10 PM, Adrian
> Crum wrote:
>
> > --- On Fri, 2/19/10, Adam Heath
> wrote:
> >> Fro
Scott Gray wrote:
> On 19/02/2010, at 10:10 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
>
>> --- On Fri, 2/19/10, Adam Heath wrote:
>>> From: Adam Heath
>>> Subject: Re: Discussion: New package org.ofbiz.base.types
>>> To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
>>> Date: Friday, February 19, 2010, 8:56 PM
>>> Adam Heath wrote:
A
On 19/02/2010, at 10:10 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
> --- On Fri, 2/19/10, Adam Heath wrote:
>> From: Adam Heath
>> Subject: Re: Discussion: New package org.ofbiz.base.types
>> To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
>> Date: Friday, February 19, 2010, 8:56 PM
>> Adam Heath wrote:
>>> Adrian Crum wrote:
In the
--- On Fri, 2/19/10, Adam Heath wrote:
> From: Adam Heath
> Subject: Re: Discussion: New package org.ofbiz.base.types
> To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
> Date: Friday, February 19, 2010, 8:56 PM
> Adam Heath wrote:
> > Adrian Crum wrote:
> >> In the org.ofbiz.base.util package there are
> interfaces and
Adam Heath wrote:
> Adrian Crum wrote:
>> In the org.ofbiz.base.util package there are interfaces and classes that
>> don't really belong there - they are data types, not utility classes. It
>> would be nice if we could create a new package to contain basic data types:
>> org.ofbiz.base.types. T
Adrian Crum wrote:
> In the org.ofbiz.base.util package there are interfaces and classes that
> don't really belong there - they are data types, not utility classes. It
> would be nice if we could create a new package to contain basic data types:
> org.ofbiz.base.types. The new package would con
In the org.ofbiz.base.util package there are interfaces and classes that don't
really belong there - they are data types, not utility classes. It would be
nice if we could create a new package to contain basic data types:
org.ofbiz.base.types. The new package would contain things like: Appender,
My latest commit finishes this effort. The original XML serialization method is
still used for backward compatibility, but new code should use the
serialzation/deserialization methods in UtilXml.
One of the problems I noticed with the existing code is that various
technologies (SOAP and JMS) we
This theme looks great guys - fantastic work. The container and drop downs
really are easy to use and make a lot of sense. The only constructive
criticism that I have is that I like the Bizzness Time theme's font and forms
inside a good bit better - not the size, but the font itself. The font
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
BJ Freeman updated OFBIZ-3490:
--
Attachment: themebutildpatch.txt
hear is the patch
> Create theme build script
> -
--- On Fri, 2/19/10, Adam Heath wrote:
> What is getOriginal supposed to
> return? The original string, or one
> that has been fixed up and normalized?
It is supposed to return the original string.
> What is toString supposed to return? The same as
> getOriginal?
The same as getOriginal. I ad
What is getOriginal supposed to return? The original string, or one
that has been fixed up and normalized?
What is toString supposed to return? The same as getOriginal? Or, a
fixed up version? Ie, if there was a parse error, a missing trailing
'}', should toString add this missing character?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
BJ Freeman updated OFBIZ-3490:
--
Affects Version/s: Release Branch 9.04
> Create theme build script
> -
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12835919#action_12835919
]
BJ Freeman commented on OFBIZ-3490:
---
once a create an new theme I compare between the new
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
BJ Freeman updated OFBIZ-3490:
--
Attachment: themesbuild.txt
this is not a patch for the actual script
> Create theme build script
> --
Create theme build script
-
Key: OFBIZ-3490
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3490
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: New Feature
Affects Versions: SVN trunk
Environment: ant build
Repo
Thank you Scott for feedback.
I agree and we will work for these.
In addition I think that when tomahawk will be the default theme we
could *drop* the dropping crumbs theme since tomahawk is its
evolution.
-Bruno
2010/2/19 Scott Gray :
> I like it. Unless there is some opposition to the theme be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12835756#action_12835756
]
Rohit Jain commented on OFBIZ-3489:
---
Here is patch for fixing this issue.
Thanks & Regar
Error in orderList Screen and order main screen in case we select type purchase
order on orderList Screen.
--
Key: OFBIZ-3489
URL: https://issues.apache.org/ji
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rohit Jain updated OFBIZ-3489:
--
Attachment: OFBIZ-3489.patch
> Error in orderList Screen and order main screen in case we select type
Hi Sascha,
I think i have already ported the layered lookups stuff on tomahawk.
Could you please give a look to the menu persistence that has been
reported by Scott? I was not able to fix it yet.
Thank you.
Bruno
2010/2/19, Sascha Rodekamp :
> Hi Bruno,
> yep i saw, great. So i will have a look to
NPE in humanres when searching for leaves
-
Key: OFBIZ-3488
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3488
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Components: humanres
Affects Versions: SVN
Yes, exactly: this potential way of sharing ui code was one of the main
motivations for the switch to macros.
Jacopo
On Feb 18, 2010, at 10:25 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
> Hi Bruno,
>
> That was one of the ideas put forward when the conversion to FTL macros took
> place.
>
> I would be in favor o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ashish Vijaywargiya closed OFBIZ-3487.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks Amit & Vivek for the contribution - Committed at r911774.
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amit Sharma updated OFBIZ-3487:
---
Attachment: OFBIZ-3487.patch
Here is the patch for the same.
Thanks Vivek !
Thanks & Regards,
--
Am
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ashish Vijaywargiya reassigned OFBIZ-3487:
--
Assignee: Ashish Vijaywargiya
> Improvement on CMS component
>
Improvement on CMS component
Key: OFBIZ-3487
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3487
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: content
Affects Versions: SVN trunk
Hi Bruno,
yep i saw, great. So i will have a look to adapt the new layer lookups :-)
2010/2/19 Bruno Busco
> Hi Sascha,
> the issue on the example screen is fixed in the latest trunk.
>
>
--
http://www.lynx.de
Hi Sascha,
the issue on the example screen is fixed in the latest trunk.
2010/2/19, Sascha Rodekamp :
> Hi Adam,
>
> i like the new layout, pretty awesome. Nice look and feel for the first
> impression.
>
> I haven't time test it in detail but maybe their will be some at the WE.
> Yesterday i try
It was on the demo site but not the latest version, the timeduration
prohibited start up
i am now updating it to the latest trunk version
Regards,
Hans
--
Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates
On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 10:37 +0530, Raj Saini wrote:
> Is it there on th
39 matches
Mail list logo
