Hi Adrian,
this is caused by the go-home and go-last functionality in the
requestmanager. The 'home' and 'last' requests are kept but only work
properly when only one screen is open. If multiple screens are open the
wrong 'last' and/or wrong 'home' request will be requested again.
In your example
- Where to check the .cowstate.xml files? I searched under Var directory
of the site causing problem but could not find any. I restarted OFBiz number
of times but that did not fix the problem (previously for such errors it was
the solution ).
- This is a pre-built system with an older version o
Using the latest trunk:
1. Log into the Example component as admin
2. Click the Help link (? in upper right corner)
3. Close the Help popup window
4. Click the language (or locale) link and change the locale
5. The main screen becomes the previous Help page
6. Navigate back to Example main page (u
On Feb 23, 2010, at 11:15 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
> --- On Tue, 2/23/10, David E Jones wrote:
>> Actually, my suggestion was not to add an attribute to the
>> script element, but allow script text under the script
>> element (surrounded by the funny CDATA thingy as needed to
>> avoid having to es
--- On Tue, 2/23/10, David E Jones wrote:
> Actually, my suggestion was not to add an attribute to the
> script element, but allow script text under the script
> element (surrounded by the funny CDATA thingy as needed to
> avoid having to escape characters all over the place).
That could get real
What's strange is that this was working fine, even on MySQL, the last time I
played with it. Unfortunately that was a bit of time ago so I don't have a good
reference to narrow this down.
I'll try some things on Derby and see if I can reproduce it, and with more
detailed steps to do so.
-Davi
I was unable to reproduce the problem in the Example component using Derby.
-Adrian
--- On Tue, 2/23/10, David E Jones wrote:
> From: David E Jones
> Subject: entity-one no longer converting types (probably a
> GenericEntity.setAllFields issue)
> To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
> Date: Tuesday, Febr
Has anyone made any changes GenericEntity.setAllFields method or the code
underneath it? It no longer works unless the primary key consists only of
String type fields.
This is easy to reproduce, even in the Example Application, by trying to work
with ExampleFeatureAppl records, which have a fr
Erwan de FERRIERES wrote:
> Le 23/02/2010 17:46, Adam Heath a écrit :
>> Erwan de FERRIERES wrote:
>>> Le 22/02/2010 17:34, doo...@apache.org a écrit :
Author: doogie
Date: Mon Feb 22 16:34:47 2010
New Revision: 912645
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=912645&view=rev
>
Kaushik Chakraborty wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am receiving the following every time I am accessing any site built using
> WebSlinger:
>
> javax.servlet.ServletException: Unknown message with code "Premature end of
> file.".
>
> org.webslinger.AbstractMappingWebslingerServletContextFactory.getWe
Hi,
I am receiving the following every time I am accessing any site built using
WebSlinger:
javax.servlet.ServletException: Unknown message with code "Premature end of
file.".
org.webslinger.AbstractMappingWebslingerServletContextFactory.getWebslingerServletContext(AbstractMappingWebsl
On 23/02/2010, at 6:27 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
> For a client, we are allowing end-users to create multiple ship-group
> destinations. This same client also has several promos, when if one
> product is bought, you get a free gift with the purchase.
>
> All of the above is straight forward.
>
> Th
For a client, we are allowing end-users to create multiple ship-group
destinations. This same client also has several promos, when if one
product is bought, you get a free gift with the purchase.
All of the above is straight forward.
The issue is when you purchase multiple of the original produc
There are unclosed elements in the main navigation:
Applications
...
...
???
-Adrian
Ashish Vijaywargiya wrote:
Today I have reviewed this theme.
Good contribution
Is there an example of a complex, service/entity based test cases that
changes the system time, and tests how things change over time?
I was going thru some old ofbiz versions, and discovered an off-by-one
fix in the shopping list recurring billing system, and would like to
have a test case of th
Makes sense. I have gone with the individual methods to be consistent with
other methods in the UtilAccounting class -- they split out a bunch of them
so that they can embed the "known" type under the covers.
As a side note, when I went to run this my JVM would actually die. It turns
out that t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12837427#action_12837427
]
Anil K Patel commented on OFBIZ-3424:
-
I have not tested the patch, but looks like it s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12837388#action_12837388
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3497:
Ha!
I see, sorry for the confusion. I mus
David E Jones wrote:
I guess what it comes down to is that if we could treat from-field like an
expression we wouldn't need the hacks in value and we wouldn't need a separate
expression attribute with yet another set of rules for people to learn.
That would work too, and it would be a simple
Actually, my suggestion was not to add an attribute to the script element, but
allow script text under the script element (surrounded by the funny CDATA
thingy as needed to avoid having to escape characters all over the place).
As for the expression attribute... IMO it would be better to simpli
Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
On a related note...
The problem Adam tried to fix is one of the problems I have with how the
scripting language is used. Here are some examples:
Both of those set elements do the same thing. The first example is (in
my opinion) a hack - it should throw
Adrian Crum wrote:
> On a related note...
>
> The problem Adam tried to fix is one of the problems I have with how the
> scripting language is used. Here are some examples:
>
>
>
>
> Both of those set elements do the same thing. The first example is (in
> my opinion) a hack - it should throw a
On a related note...
The problem Adam tried to fix is one of the problems I have with how the
scripting language is used. Here are some examples:
Both of those set elements do the same thing. The first example is (in
my opinion) a hack - it should throw an exception. The value attribute
s
Today I have reviewed this theme.
Good contribution - thanks Erik & Bruno.
--
Ashish
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 7:28 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
> Have people had a chance to look at the tomahawk theme yet? I'd like
> to have a vote to switch the default theme to tomahawk. It's much
> more usable than
> update your OFBiz instance to any version after the 912645, compile and
> just try to login to
> https://localhost:8443/ap/control/main or
> https://localhost:8443/ar/control/main
>
> The page will not be displayed, and the only thing you will see is this
> message
> ERROR rendering error page
Le 23/02/2010 17:46, Adam Heath a écrit :
Erwan de FERRIERES wrote:
Le 22/02/2010 17:34, doo...@apache.org a écrit :
Author: doogie
Date: Mon Feb 22 16:34:47 2010
New Revision: 912645
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=912645&view=rev
Log:
Make use of FSE.expand(), instead of expandString,
Erwan de FERRIERES wrote:
> Le 22/02/2010 17:34, doo...@apache.org a écrit :
>> Author: doogie
>> Date: Mon Feb 22 16:34:47 2010
>> New Revision: 912645
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=912645&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Make use of FSE.expand(), instead of expandString, to provide support
>> fo
Le 22/02/2010 17:34, doo...@apache.org a écrit :
Author: doogie
Date: Mon Feb 22 16:34:47 2010
New Revision: 912645
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=912645&view=rev
Log:
Make use of FSE.expand(), instead of expandString, to provide support
for direct setting of values in widgets. This clos
On Feb 23, 2010, at 5:29 PM, Bob Morley wrote:
> Jacopo --
>
> I like the utility method that you provided. However, the implementation of
> these services is in minilang so calling it is a little bit of a pain.
Yes, there are some examples of its usage in Minilang, like:
but I agree it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12837300#action_12837300
]
Erwan de FERRIERES commented on OFBIZ-3497:
---
Jacques,
we are not speaking of the
I like the idea of employee expenses, but we have not considered them to date
for our solution. Right now I think they would be entered by the bookkeeper
directly as an acctgTrans with associated entries. Not think I think having
that type of invoice is a bad idea (as a more robust model of thes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12837272#action_12837272
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3497:
Erwan,
Sure, I know that, it's in the exa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12837233#action_12837233
]
Erwan de FERRIERES commented on OFBIZ-3497:
---
Hi Jacques,
if you want to choose t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12837217#action_12837217
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3497:
Hi Erwan,
This makes sense indeed since w
Ho Jacopo,
Yes i considered that, however a project is a special case. the whole
project manager is arranged using the parentWorkeffortId because in a
project the task can only have one parent, not more.
This has nothing to do with the dependencies which is also used, this is
just a matter of org
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erwan de FERRIERES updated OFBIZ-3497:
--
Attachment: OFBIZ-3497.png
An example
> using date-time type="time" shouldn't display
using date-time type="time" shouldn't display a textbox for a date
--
Key: OFBIZ-3497
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3497
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
On Feb 23, 2010, at 11:47 AM, hans...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: hansbak
> Date: Tue Feb 23 10:47:21 2010
> New Revision: 915275
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=915275&view=rev
> Log:
> add optional sequenceNum to be able to order phases and tasks within a project
>
> Modified:
>o
Hi Devs,
In revision 912532 I have introduced an automated test
testUpdateFixedAssetMaintAndWorkEffortComplete for testing the process of
updating a fixed asset maintenance. In the commit I have also removed
WorkEffort.actualCompletionDate from the previous tests as this newly added
test uses the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sascha Rodekamp updated OFBIZ-3492:
---
Attachment: OFBIZ-3492_tomahawk_lookup_update.patch
Updated against the latest trunk (resolve
I would suggest to replace static "equals" condition for "PURCHASE_INVOICE"
with the utility method:
if (CommonWorkers.hasParentType(delegator, "InvoiceType", "invoiceTypeId",
invoiceTypeId, "parentTypeId", "PURCHASE_INVOICE")) {
//
}
(where invoiceTypeId could contain "COMMISSION_INVO
41 matches
Mail list logo
