Re: svn commit: r926908 - in /ofbiz/trunk: applications/accounting/data/ applications/accounting/widget/ar/ applications/party/data/ applications/party/widget/partymgr/ themes/tomahawk/includes/

Thank you bruno for reporting: fixed in revision 928131. On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 14:19 +0100, Bruno Busco wrote: > Hi, > this change breakes the example application screens. > > Please give a look at the following using the tomahawk theme: > > https://localhost:8443/example/control/main > the tab

Re: ShoppingCart.getPartyDaysSinceCreated

Adrian Crum wrote: > --- On Fri, 3/26/10, Adam Heath wrote: >> Scott Gray wrote: >>> On 26/03/2010, at 5:13 PM, Adam Heath wrote: >>> The above method makes use of a BigDecimal. >> This is wrong. It should be an int. Originally, before the BigDecimal >> conversion, it was a Doubl

Re: ShoppingCart.getPartyDaysSinceCreated

Adrian Crum wrote: > --- On Fri, 3/26/10, Adam Heath wrote: >> Scott Gray wrote: >>> On 26/03/2010, at 5:13 PM, Adam Heath wrote: >>> The above method makes use of a BigDecimal. >> This is wrong. It should be an int. Originally, before the BigDecimal >> conversion, it was a Doubl

Re: ShoppingCart.getPartyDaysSinceCreated

Scott Gray wrote: > On 26/03/2010, at 6:32 PM, Adam Heath wrote: > >> Scott Gray wrote: >>> On 26/03/2010, at 5:13 PM, Adam Heath wrote: >>> The above method makes use of a BigDecimal. This is wrong. It should be an int. Originally, before the BigDecimal conversion, it was a Doub

Re: ShoppingCart.getPartyDaysSinceCreated

On 26/03/2010, at 6:32 PM, Adam Heath wrote: > Scott Gray wrote: >> On 26/03/2010, at 5:13 PM, Adam Heath wrote: >> >>> The above method makes use of a BigDecimal. This is wrong. It should >>> be an int. Originally, before the BigDecimal conversion, it was a >>> Double. This method should hav

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3578) tenant login can cause a problem with contactinating a delegaor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3578?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] BJ Freeman updated OFBIZ-3578: -- Attachment: (was: loginwrktenant.patch) > tenant login can cause a problem with contactinating a de

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3578) tenant login can cause a problem with contactinating a delegaor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3578?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] BJ Freeman updated OFBIZ-3578: -- Attachment: OFBIZ-3578loginwrktenant.patch forgot the jira number > tenant login can cause a problem w

Re: ShoppingCart.getPartyDaysSinceCreated

--- On Fri, 3/26/10, Adam Heath wrote: > Scott Gray wrote: > > On 26/03/2010, at 5:13 PM, Adam Heath wrote: > > > >> The above method makes use of a BigDecimal.  > This is wrong.  It should > >> be an int.  Originally, before the BigDecimal > conversion, it was a > >> Double.  This method should

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3578) tenant login can cause a problem with contactinating a delegaor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3578?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] BJ Freeman updated OFBIZ-3578: -- Attachment: loginwrktenant.patch > tenant login can cause a problem with contactinating a delegaor > --

[jira] Created: (OFBIZ-3578) tenant login can cause a problem with contactinating a delegaor

tenant login can cause a problem with contactinating a delegaor --- Key: OFBIZ-3578 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3578 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Co

Re: ShoppingCart.getPartyDaysSinceCreated

Scott Gray wrote: > On 26/03/2010, at 5:13 PM, Adam Heath wrote: > >> The above method makes use of a BigDecimal. This is wrong. It should >> be an int. Originally, before the BigDecimal conversion, it was a >> Double. This method should have never been converted. > > It looked like a good ca

Re: ShoppingCart.getPartyDaysSinceCreated

On 26/03/2010, at 5:13 PM, Adam Heath wrote: > The above method makes use of a BigDecimal. This is wrong. It should > be an int. Originally, before the BigDecimal conversion, it was a > Double. This method should have never been converted. It looked like a good candidate at the time and looki

Re: [jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3540) Multi-Tenant Support (Login Based)

David, I was very eager to help. I followed your instructions and got install error. so to me I was within the scope. So I don't understand your comment about demo is a demo. = BJ Freeman http://bjfreeman.elance.com Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation

ShoppingCart.getPartyDaysSinceCreated

The above method makes use of a BigDecimal. This is wrong. It should be an int. Originally, before the BigDecimal conversion, it was a Double. This method should have never been converted. Also, it does time internal calculation wrong. It will have the same daylight savings time problem, when

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3540) Multi-Tenant Support (Login Based)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3540?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David E. Jones updated OFBIZ-3540: -- Attachment: (was: ecommercetenatsadd.patch) > Multi-Tenant Support (Login Based) >

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3540) Multi-Tenant Support (Login Based)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3540?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12850352#action_12850352 ] David E. Jones commented on OFBIZ-3540: --- BJ: Please don't add patches to an issue tha

[jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-3540) Multi-Tenant Support (Login Based)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3540?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David E. Jones closed OFBIZ-3540. - Resolution: Fixed The multi-tenant branch has now been merged into the trunk so the original sco

buildbot success in ASF Buildbot on ofbiz-trunk

The Buildbot has detected a restored build of ofbiz-trunk on ASF Buildbot. Full details are available at: http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/2975 Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu Build Reason: Build Source Stamp: [branch ofbiz/trunk] 9280

[jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-3577) LoginWorker.doBasicLogout does not check userLogin against null

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3577?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-3577. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: SVN trunk Release Branch 9.04

Re: Clearing credit card data after capture

Great, thanks BJ! I will give it a try. -- View this message in context: http://n4.nabble.com/Clearing-credit-card-data-after-capture-tp203987p1692770.html Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Resolving inconsistency between serialized and non-serialized inventory

One of the issues that has cropped up from time to time for us is the inconsistency with how serialized and non-serialized inventory are handled. Serialized inventory availability to based primarily on the statusId on the InventoryItem entity while non-serialized inventory is based the materializ

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3540) Multi-Tenant Support (Login Based)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3540?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12850316#action_12850316 ] BJ Freeman commented on OFBIZ-3540: --- when I do: $ ant $ java -Xmx512m -XX:MaxPermSize=128

Re: Clearing credit card data after capture

check the CreditCard Entity in the /application/accounting/entitydef/entitymodel.xml also cruise the other entities. Do a search of the code that interacts with CreditCard entity and the ALias CC. also check the schedule services to re-authorize cc http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBADMI

Re: svn commit: r927870 - /ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/webapp/accounting/WEB-INF/actions/invoice/ListNotAppliedPayments.groovy

On 26/03/2010, at 8:53 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > From: "Adam Heath" >> jler...@apache.org wrote: >>> Author: jleroux >>> Date: Fri Mar 26 14:34:02 2010 >>> New Revision: 927870 >>> >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=927870&view=rev >>> Log: >>> Fix a NPE I got on actualCurrencyAmount w

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3577) LoginWorker.doBasicLogout does not check userLogin against null

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3577?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Stefan Roggensack updated OFBIZ-3577: - Attachment: LoginWorker.java.patch The requestst patch. Simple make a null check before u

Re: Clearing credit card data after capture

Agreed. However I can't imagine ofbiz would be that hard to customize a payment service to provide that feature. I've been working with ofbiz for about 5 months now, just as a side job a few hours a week and everything so far seems to be very customizable. I've been really impressed with it and

buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on ofbiz-trunk

The Buildbot has detected a new failure of ofbiz-trunk on ASF Buildbot. Full details are available at: http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/2974 Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu Build Reason: Build Source Stamp: [branch ofbiz/trunk] 927961

Re: Clearing credit card data after capture

not all gateways in ofbiz provide the functionality of cybersource. you can use paypal the same way. = BJ Freeman http://bjfreeman.elance.com Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation Specialtymarket.c

Re: Clearing credit card data after capture

Storing credit card numbers seems to be a recurring concern with many people. I’ve tried to find out as much as I can on this issue in regards to ofbiz. Here are the threads I’ve found so far. http://osdir.com/ml/user.ofbiz.apache.org/2009-10/msg00706.html http://www.mail-archive.com/u...@ofbiz

Re: svn commit: r927924 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework/common: config/general.properties webcommon/login.ftl

From: "Adam Heath" er...@apache.org wrote: Author: erwan Date: Fri Mar 26 15:44:04 2010 New Revision: 927924 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=927924&view=rev Log: As suggested by Adrian, adding an option to hide the tenant ID's textbox in login form Modified: ofbiz/trunk/framework/c

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3577) LoginWorker.doBasicLogout does not check userLogin against null

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3577?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12850195#action_12850195 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3577: Hi Stefan, A patch ? > LoginWorker.doBas

Re: svn commit: r927924 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework/common: config/general.properties webcommon/login.ftl

er...@apache.org wrote: > Author: erwan > Date: Fri Mar 26 15:44:04 2010 > New Revision: 927924 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=927924&view=rev > Log: > As suggested by Adrian, adding an option to hide the tenant ID's textbox in > login form > > Modified: > ofbiz/trunk/framework/co

Re: Discussion: Improved Groovy Support

Adrian Crum wrote: > --- On Thu, 3/25/10, Adam Heath wrote: >> Adrian Crum wrote: >>> I have been working on some ideas with the goal of >> making Groovy a >>> viable alternative to mini-language. I already >> committed some code that >>> allows methods within a Groovy script to be called, so >> t

Re: Discussion: Improved Groovy Support

--- On Thu, 3/25/10, Adam Heath wrote: > Adrian Crum wrote: > > I have been working on some ideas with the goal of > making Groovy a > > viable alternative to mini-language. I already > committed some code that > > allows methods within a Groovy script to be called, so > that multiple > > services

Re: svn commit: r927888 - in /ofbiz/trunk/applications/workeffort: config/WorkEffortUiLabels.xml webapp/workeffort/calendar/month.ftl

+ +Max # of Events: ${maxNumberOfEvents} +Max numero di eventi: ${maxNumberOfEvents} + -Adrian --- On Fri, 3/26/10, jaco...@apache.org wrote: > From: jaco...@apache.org > Subject: svn commit: r927888 - in /ofbiz/trunk/applications/workeffort: > config/WorkEffortUiLabel

Re: svn commit: r927876 - in /ofbiz/branches/release09.04: ./ .project applications/accounting/webapp/accounting/WEB-INF/actions/invoice/ListNotAppliedPayments.groovy startofbiz.bat

Sorry, Actually I did not notice that the backport did changes also in .project and .bat. I wonder now if we should revert or not. Obviously these are improvements that can't introduce any bugs. But if somebody feels that I should strictly follow the policy I will revert Jacques From: To: S

Re: svn commit: r927867 - /ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/src/org/ofbiz/base/lang/ComparableRange.java

On Mar 26, 2010, at 3:33 PM, Adam Heath wrote: > jaco...@apache.org wrote: >> Author: jacopoc >> Date: Fri Mar 26 14:27:49 2010 >> New Revision: 927867 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=927867&view=rev >> Log: >> I have forgotten to commit this in my previous commit (927783): now the

Re: svn commit: r927876 - in /ofbiz/branches/release09.04: ./ .project applications/accounting/webapp/accounting/WEB-INF/actions/invoice/ListNotAppliedPayments.groovy startofbiz.bat

jler...@apache.org wrote: > Author: jleroux > Date: Fri Mar 26 14:39:45 2010 > New Revision: 927876 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=927876&view=rev > Log: > "Applied fix from trunk for revision: 927870 " > > r9278

Re: svn commit: r927870 - /ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/webapp/accounting/WEB-INF/actions/invoice/ListNotAppliedPayments.groovy

From: "Adam Heath" jler...@apache.org wrote: Author: jleroux Date: Fri Mar 26 14:34:02 2010 New Revision: 927870 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=927870&view=rev Log: Fix a NPE I got on actualCurrencyAmount while working with R9.04. Since the files are identical I commit in trunk and will

Re: svn commit: r927870 - /ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/webapp/accounting/WEB-INF/actions/invoice/ListNotAppliedPayments.groovy

jler...@apache.org wrote: > Author: jleroux > Date: Fri Mar 26 14:34:02 2010 > New Revision: 927870 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=927870&view=rev > Log: > Fix a NPE I got on actualCurrencyAmount while working with R9.04. > Since the files are identical I commit in trunk and will backp

Re: svn commit: r927867 - /ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/src/org/ofbiz/base/lang/ComparableRange.java

jaco...@apache.org wrote: > Author: jacopoc > Date: Fri Mar 26 14:27:49 2010 > New Revision: 927867 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=927867&view=rev > Log: > I have forgotten to commit this in my previous commit (927783): now the > ComparableRange class implements the Comparable interfac

[jira] Created: (OFBIZ-3577) LoginWorker.doBasicLogout does not check userLogin against null

LoginWorker.doBasicLogout does not check userLogin against null --- Key: OFBIZ-3577 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3577 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Co

Re: Merging multitenant branch into trunk

Ok looked at it this morning an see the space between # and DEMO1 debugging = BJ Freeman http://bjfreeman.elance.com Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation Specialtymarket.com

Re: svn commit: r926908 - in /ofbiz/trunk: applications/accounting/data/ applications/accounting/widget/ar/ applications/party/data/ applications/party/widget/partymgr/ themes/tomahawk/includes/

Hi, this change breakes the example application screens. Please give a look at the following using the tomahawk theme: https://localhost:8443/example/control/main the tab bar menu should only show the "example" tab and should have only the last item yellow https://localhost:8443/example/control/

Re: This URL does not work

FYI I increased R9.04 (stable demo) to 256 PermGen this morning. We will see if it's enough... Jacques From: "Jacques Le Roux" Done, rebooted the server it's ok directory now /home/ofbiz I still wonder why R9.04 seems to not need a PermGen change. Do we use so much more class loaders in tru

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (OFBIZ-3552) Initial Inventory Item Status is saved wrong in case of non-serialized inventory and when reason of return is "Defective Item", at the the time of receiving

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12850052#action_12850052 ] Ashish Vijaywargiya edited comment on OFBIZ-3552 at 3/26/10 9:44 AM:

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3552) Initial Inventory Item Status is saved wrong in case of non-serialized inventory and when reason of return is "Defective Item", at the the time of receiving returns

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12850054#action_12850054 ] Divesh Dutta commented on OFBIZ-3552: - Oh ! Thanks Ashish, it should be INV_DEFECTIVE .

[jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-3552) Initial Inventory Item Status is saved wrong in case of non-serialized inventory and when reason of return is "Defective Item", at the the time of receiving returns

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ashish Vijaywargiya closed OFBIZ-3552. -- Resolution: Fixed Thanks Divesh & Pranay for the contribution - Done at r927744. Small

[jira] Created: (OFBIZ-3576) Error in Creating new Content - CMS.

Error in Creating new Content - CMS. - Key: OFBIZ-3576 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3576 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: content Affects Versions: SVN trunk