[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3625) Adding a portal-page widget

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3625?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12851735#action_12851735 ] Bruno Busco commented on OFBIZ-3625: What is stopping me here is that it seems not poss

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3621) XHTML validation errors (themes)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12851733#action_12851733 ] Bruno Busco commented on OFBIZ-3621: Hi Blas, with this latest implementation we have t

Re: svn commit: r928304 - /ofbiz/trunk/framework/widget/templates/htmlFormMacroLibrary.ftl

Sorry, after sending I realized you had reverted already, please disregard. Thanks Scott On 30/03/2010, at 9:25 PM, Scott Gray wrote: > Hi Jacques, > > The makeHiddenFormLinkAnchor is used for more than just field lookups. > > Regards > Scott > > HotWax Media > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > >

Re: svn commit: r928304 - /ofbiz/trunk/framework/widget/templates/htmlFormMacroLibrary.ftl

Hi Jacques, The makeHiddenFormLinkAnchor is used for more than just field lookups. Regards Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 27/03/2010, at 5:28 PM, jler...@apache.org wrote: > Author: jleroux > Date: Sat Mar 27 23:28:18 2010 > New Revision: 928304 > > URL: http://svn.apache.or

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3626) XHTML validation errors (framework/widget) Buggy render of fieldgroups in ModelForm

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3626?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Blas Rodriguez Somoza updated OFBIZ-3626: - Attachment: OFBIZ-3626_framework_widget_xhtml_v2.diff > XHTML validation errors (

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3626) XHTML validation errors (framework/widget) Buggy render of fieldgroups in ModelForm

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3626?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Blas Rodriguez Somoza updated OFBIZ-3626: - Description: The rendering of fieldgroups in ModelForm is wrong As an example, t

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3626) XHTML validation errors (framework/widget) Buggy render of fieldgroups in ModelForm

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3626?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Blas Rodriguez Somoza updated OFBIZ-3626: - Description: The rendering of fieldgroups in ModelForm is wrong As an example, t

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3626) XHTML validation errors (framework/widget) Buggy render of fieldgroups in ModelForm

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3626?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Blas Rodriguez Somoza updated OFBIZ-3626: - Summary: XHTML validation errors (framework/widget) Buggy render of fieldgroups i

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3626) XHTML validation erros (framework/widget) Buggy render of fieldgroups in ModelForm

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3626?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Blas Rodriguez Somoza updated OFBIZ-3626: - Attachment: OFBIZ-3626_framework_widget_xhtml.diff > XHTML validation erros (fram

[jira] Created: (OFBIZ-3626) XHTML validation erros (framework/widget) Buggy render of fieldgroups in ModelForm

XHTML validation erros (framework/widget) Buggy render of fieldgroups in ModelForm -- Key: OFBIZ-3626 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3626 Project: OFBiz

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (OFBIZ-3621) XHTML validation errors (themes)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12851671#action_12851671 ] Blas Rodriguez Somoza edited comment on OFBIZ-3621 at 3/31/10 12:31 AM: -

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3621) XHTML validation errors (themes)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Blas Rodriguez Somoza updated OFBIZ-3621: - Attachment: OFBIZ-3621_themes_xhtml_v3.diff > XHTML validation errors (themes) >

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3621) XHTML validation errors (themes)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Blas Rodriguez Somoza updated OFBIZ-3621: - Attachment: li_img_error.jpg > XHTML validation errors (themes) > ---

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3621) XHTML validation errors (themes)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12851671#action_12851671 ] Blas Rodriguez Somoza commented on OFBIZ-3621: -- Hello Bruno It's true, althou

Re: Tenant loading of data

Scott I am talking about the tenantdatssource being available to another tenant so they can modify their entries to cruise other tenants data. I am using the current demo data as an example. BJ Freeman http://bjfreeman.elance.com Strategic Power Office with Supplier Auto

Re: Tenant loading of data

to me demo data is to show how the data should be done. as many times people say use the demo data as a template to do production. to me each tenant should not see data about other tenants, like there dB data in tenantdatasource the Demo shows that the tenantdatasource is accessable through webto

Re: Discussion: Time zones and software design

On Mar 30, 2010, at 4:01 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: > A short while back, it was mentioned that the time zone handling in OFBiz is > inconsistent. I suggested that a date-time data type should be used instead > of a java.util.Date or java.sql.Timestamp. Before a change like that can be > made, we

Re: Tenant loading of data

I just want to throw in that I also have no idea what you are talking about BJ. Regards Scott On 30/03/2010, at 5:24 PM, BJ Freeman wrote: > David: > I find you question, about what needs to be changed puzzling. > my original email laid out what was in ofbiz. > your response laid out a solution,

Re: Tenant loading of data

I guess what I wrote was not clear enough: your understanding of how the data is organized and how things work is incorrect. What I wrote was not to recommend a fix, it was to recommend that you do some more research to better understand. The key to that is what I wrote in reply to your first

Re: Tenant loading of data

David: I find you question, about what needs to be changed puzzling. my original email laid out what was in ofbiz. your response laid out a solution, which requires changes to the svn. I said fine I will open a jira. then you turn around and ask what needs to be changed. if you don't know why make

Re: Tenant loading of data

develope a load of data that does not load then tenant entities I talked about for the Demo1 and Demo2 load for one. = BJ Freeman http://bjfreeman.elance.com Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation Sp

Re: Tenant loading of data

What needs to be changed in the demo data? -David On Mar 30, 2010, at 4:57 PM, BJ Freeman wrote: > so the demo data now provided needs to be changed, if I read you correct > I will open a jira for that purpose. > > = > BJ Freeman > http://bjfreeman.elance.com > Strateg

Re: Tenant loading of data

so the demo data now provided needs to be changed, if I read you correct I will open a jira for that purpose. = BJ Freeman http://bjfreeman.elance.com Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation Specialty

Re: Tenant loading of data

For both this and the other problems you mentioned what you need to do is take a look into what "seed" data includes and what "demo" and other data sets include. -David On Mar 30, 2010, at 1:13 PM, BJ Freeman wrote: > when the data is loaded from > java -Xmx512m -XX:MaxPermSize=128m -jar ofb

Discussion: Time zones and software design

A short while back, it was mentioned that the time zone handling in OFBiz is inconsistent. I suggested that a date-time data type should be used instead of a java.util.Date or java.sql.Timestamp. Before a change like that can be made, we really need to discuss time zones on a higher level - the

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3592) application - workeffort

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3592?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bob Morley updated OFBIZ-3592: -- Attachment: OFBIZ-3592_ResolveJavaWarningsWorkeffort.patch > application - workeffort > ---

[jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-3608) XHTML validation errors (party)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bruno Busco closed OFBIZ-3608. -- Resolution: Fixed Thank you Blas, your patch is in trunk at revision: 929303 > XHTML validation errors

[jira] Assigned: (OFBIZ-3608) XHTML validation errors (party)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bruno Busco reassigned OFBIZ-3608: -- Assignee: Bruno Busco > XHTML validation errors (party) > --- > >

[jira] Resolved: (OFBIZ-3602) specialpurpose - workflow

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3602?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bob Morley resolved OFBIZ-3602. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: SVN trunk > specialpurpose - workflow > -

[jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-3604) XHTML validation errors (humanres)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3604?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bruno Busco closed OFBIZ-3604. -- Resolution: Fixed Thank you Blas, your patch is in trunk at revision: 929292 > XHTML validation errors

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3602) specialpurpose - workflow

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3602?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bob Morley updated OFBIZ-3602: -- Attachment: OFBIZ-3602_ResolveJavaWarningsWorkflow.patch Quite a few files have been modified with (in

[jira] Assigned: (OFBIZ-3604) XHTML validation errors (humanres)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3604?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bruno Busco reassigned OFBIZ-3604: -- Assignee: Bruno Busco > XHTML validation errors (humanres) > --

[jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-3612) XHTML validation errors (specialpurpose_cmssite)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3612?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bruno Busco closed OFBIZ-3612. -- Resolution: Fixed Thank you Blas, your patch is in trunk at revision: 929286 > XHTML validation errors

[jira] Assigned: (OFBIZ-3612) XHTML validation errors (specialpurpose_cmssite)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3612?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bruno Busco reassigned OFBIZ-3612: -- Assignee: Bruno Busco > XHTML validation errors (specialpurpose_cmssite) >

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3621) XHTML validation errors (themes)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bruno Busco updated OFBIZ-3621: --- Attachment: black_space.JPG Hi Blas, I tested this patch but I have got an issue with the new logo ha

[jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-3611) XHTML validation errors (content)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3611?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bruno Busco closed OFBIZ-3611. -- Resolution: Fixed Thank you Blas, your patch is in trunk at revision: 929257 > XHTML validation errors

Re: svn commit: r929073 - /ofbiz/site/index.html

On 30/03/2010, at 2:03 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Anyway if you really feel it should be removed go ahead. It's not a big deal > for now, only an experiment. Thanks Jacques, done in r929256 Regards Scott > > Scott Gray wrote: >> Well that makes it a little difficult to determine how useful

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-352) using Transfer shipments to transfer inventory

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-352?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12851559#action_12851559 ] Andrei Tulai commented on OFBIZ-352: I'm currently looking for this feature, and I'm cur

Re: squareFootage with decimals

OK, I will revert now and introduces the 2 fields as suggested tomorrow (in case somebody has another idea) Jacques David E Jones wrote: I just checked and I messed up... there isn't a UOM field that goes with the squareFootage field. That being the case, I propose we add a couple of generic

[jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-3619) XHTML validation errors (specialpurpose_webpos)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bruno Busco closed OFBIZ-3619. -- Resolution: Fixed Thank you Blas, your patch is in trunk at revision: 929243 > XHTML validation errors

Re: svn commit: r929073 - /ofbiz/site/index.html

Scott, I already tried a notice from the user mailing list. I got some answers then http://ofbiz.uservoice.com/forums/45214-general but not much (almost any) answers after this moment. I did any notices in user ML but got already one answer from main page. I'd just like to see how it will go for

[jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-3620) XHTML validation errors (specialpurpose_workflow)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3620?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bruno Busco closed OFBIZ-3620. -- Resolution: Fixed Thank you Blaz, your patch is in trunk at revision: 929235 > XHTML validation err

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3599) specialpurpose - oagis

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bob Morley updated OFBIZ-3599: -- Attachment: OFBIZ-3599_ResolveJavaWarningsOagis.patch There were a particularly large number of warning

[jira] Resolved: (OFBIZ-3599) specialpurpose - oagis

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bob Morley resolved OFBIZ-3599. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: SVN trunk > specialpurpose - oagis > -- >

Tenant loading of data

when the data is loaded from java -Xmx512m -XX:MaxPermSize=128m -jar ofbiz.jar -install -readers=seed -delegator=default#DEMO1 and login as DEMO1 https://localhost:8443/webtools/control/FindGeneric?entityName=TenantDataSource&find=true&VIEW_SIZE=50&VIEW_INDEX=0 shows the connection for both DEMO1 a

Re: Multitenant documentation

oops clicked on wrong one. this one I booked marked = BJ Freeman http://bjfreeman.elance.com Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation Specialtymarket.com Systems Inte

Re: multitenant / multi-delegator

thanks. Bookmarked it = BJ Freeman http://bjfreeman.elance.com Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation Specialtymarket.com Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat

[jira] Assigned: (OFBIZ-3621) XHTML validation errors (themes)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bruno Busco reassigned OFBIZ-3621: -- Assignee: Bruno Busco > XHTML validation errors (themes) > > >

[jira] Assigned: (OFBIZ-3611) XHTML validation errors (content)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3611?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bruno Busco reassigned OFBIZ-3611: -- Assignee: Bruno Busco > XHTML validation errors (content) > - >

[jira] Assigned: (OFBIZ-3619) XHTML validation errors (specialpurpose_webpos)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bruno Busco reassigned OFBIZ-3619: -- Assignee: Bruno Busco > XHTML validation errors (specialpurpose_webpos) > -

[jira] Assigned: (OFBIZ-3620) XHTML validation errors (specialpurpose_workflow)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3620?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bruno Busco reassigned OFBIZ-3620: -- Assignee: Bruno Busco > XHTML validation errors (specialpurpose_workflow) > ---

Re: Use of internal direct variable access, or using accessor methods

Adam Heath wrote: Adrian Crum wrote: Adam Heath wrote: ComparableRange has inconsistent access to the instance variables of other ComparableRanges. There are several methods that do some kind of comparison with another range. Sometimes, those methods call the accessor methods. Other times, d

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3600) specialpurpose - pos

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3600?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bob Morley updated OFBIZ-3600: -- Attachment: OFBIZ-3600_ResolveJavaWarningsPos.patch Changes across quite a few classes in the Pos area.

[jira] Resolved: (OFBIZ-3600) specialpurpose - pos

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3600?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bob Morley resolved OFBIZ-3600. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: SVN trunk > specialpurpose - pos > > >

Re: Use of internal direct variable access, or using accessor methods

Adrian Crum wrote: > Adam Heath wrote: >> ComparableRange has inconsistent access to the instance variables of >> other ComparableRanges. There are several methods that do some kind >> of comparison with another range. Sometimes, those methods call the >> accessor methods. Other times, direct va

Re: svn commit: r929073 - /ofbiz/site/index.html

Well that makes it a little difficult to determine how useful it was being. I would still like to see it removed from the main page for now. Why not just create a wiki page with an overview of the tool's purpose and link to it from that? You could point people to it in mailing list discussion

Re: Use of internal direct variable access, or using accessor methods

From: "Adrian Crum" Adam Heath wrote: ComparableRange has inconsistent access to the instance variables of other ComparableRanges. There are several methods that do some kind of comparison with another range. Sometimes, those methods call the accessor methods. Other times, direct variable ac

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3608) XHTML validation errors (party)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Blas Rodriguez Somoza updated OFBIZ-3608: - Description: XHTML validation errors * Unclosed INPUT * attributes witho

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3608) XHTML validation errors (party)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Blas Rodriguez Somoza updated OFBIZ-3608: - Attachment: OFBIZ-3608_party_xhtml_v2.diff > XHTML validation errors (party) > --

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3607) XHTML validation errors (order)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Blas Rodriguez Somoza updated OFBIZ-3607: - Attachment: OFBIZ-3607_order_xhtml_v2.diff > XHTML validation errors (order) > --

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3607) XHTML validation errors (order)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Blas Rodriguez Somoza updated OFBIZ-3607: - Description: XHTML validation errors * Unclosed INPUT * attributes witho

Re: Use of internal direct variable access, or using accessor methods

Adam Heath wrote: ComparableRange has inconsistent access to the instance variables of other ComparableRanges. There are several methods that do some kind of comparison with another range. Sometimes, those methods call the accessor methods. Other times, direct variable access is used. Here's

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3605) XHTML validation errors (manufacturing)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Blas Rodriguez Somoza updated OFBIZ-3605: - Attachment: OFBIZ-3605_manufacturing_xhtml_v2.diff > XHTML validation errors (man

Re: squareFootage with decimals

I just checked and I messed up... there isn't a UOM field that goes with the squareFootage field. That being the case, I propose we add a couple of generic fields (facilitySize as a float, facilitySizeUomId) and deprecate the squareFootage field. BTW, however it's done with an explicit UOM it'

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3625) Adding a portal-page widget

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3625?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bruno Busco updated OFBIZ-3625: --- Attachment: ofbiz.log This is the log file I get when the https://localhost:8443/example/control/Fin

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3605) XHTML validation errors (manufacturing)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Blas Rodriguez Somoza updated OFBIZ-3605: - Description: XHTML validation errors * Unclosed INPUT * attributes withou

Re: use of this keyword in variable access

Adam Heath wrote: Adrian Crum wrote: I like using the this keyword because it makes the scope clear. I find it makes it easier for me to understand someone else's code. That's the compilers job, don't try to do an end run around it. Excuse me?? int var2 = someMethod(someValue); The scope o

Use of internal direct variable access, or using accessor methods

ComparableRange has inconsistent access to the instance variables of other ComparableRanges. There are several methods that do some kind of comparison with another range. Sometimes, those methods call the accessor methods. Other times, direct variable access is used. Here's my take on this issu

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3625) Adding a portal-page widget

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3625?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bruno Busco updated OFBIZ-3625: --- Attachment: portalPageWidget.patch > Adding a portal-page widget > --- > >

[jira] Created: (OFBIZ-3625) Adding a portal-page widget

Adding a portal-page widget --- Key: OFBIZ-3625 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3625 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: New Feature Components: framework Reporter: Bruno Busco A

Re: use of this keyword in variable access

Adrian Crum wrote: > I like using the this keyword because it makes the scope clear. I find > it makes it easier for me to understand someone else's code. That's the compilers job, don't try to do an end run around it.

Re: squareFootage with decimals

As per David's email the uom field is already there, the migration service was just a suggestion and because the uom is already there it isn't useful anyway. Regards Scott On 30/03/2010, at 9:49 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Why not simply add a new field for the UomId ? Do we really need a serv

Re: use of this keyword in variable access

From: "Adam Heath" What is the policy on use of this to access the variables and methods in ofbiz? It's not entirely consistent across the code base. I would prefer not to use this when it isn't needed, as it introduces an extra keyword into the code. +1 Jacques

Re: use of this keyword in variable access

I'm guessing it also gets used a lot because of IDE code completion. Regards Scott On 30/03/2010, at 9:56 AM, Adrian Crum wrote: > I like using the this keyword because it makes the scope clear. I find it > makes it easier for me to understand someone else's code. > > -Adrian > > Adam Heath w

Re: svn commit: r929073 - /ofbiz/site/index.html

There are anything in ideascale because I cleaned it before putting the link from home page Jacques From: "Jacques Le Roux" Actually I already tried 2 tools from user ML http://markmail.org/message/dfwmoj45cgojgp5d I chose ideascale because it allows negative votes Jacques From: "Jacopo Ca

Re: squareFootage with decimals

Thanks David, I didn't look at the entity in question before commenting, if there is a uom already then Jacques proposal sounds fine to me (aside from the unfortunate name of the existing value field). Regards Scott On 30/03/2010, at 9:37 AM, David E Jones wrote: > > A storage tank might be b

Re: use of this keyword in variable access

I like using the this keyword because it makes the scope clear. I find it makes it easier for me to understand someone else's code. -Adrian Adam Heath wrote: What is the policy on use of this to access the variables and methods in ofbiz? It's not entirely consistent across the code base. I w

Re: squareFootage with decimals

From: "David E Jones" A storage tank might be better modeled as an asset that is located in a facility rather than being a facility itself. BTW, we already have a UOM field to go along with the "squareFootage" field (which is unfortunate that it was done that way, but it's been there for a wh

Re: squareFootage with decimals

From: "David E Jones" A storage tank might be better modeled as an asset that is located in a facility rather than being a facility itself. BTW, we already have a UOM field to go along with the "squareFootage" field (which is unfortunate that it was done that way, but it's been there for a wh

Re: svn commit: r929073 - /ofbiz/site/index.html

Actually I already tried 2 tools from user ML http://markmail.org/message/dfwmoj45cgojgp5d I chose ideascale because it allows negative votes Jacques From: "Jacopo Cappellato" On Mar 30, 2010, at 5:25 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Jacopo, Scott, What kind of issues do you fear? Actually no

Re: squareFootage with decimals

Why not simply add a new field for the UomId ? Do we really need a service to migrate data? It seems to me that previous integers will be simply represented with 0 decimals. At least I tested on Postgres without any issues at all. I tried to keep things simple, to me and to persons who will nee

use of this keyword in variable access

What is the policy on use of this to access the variables and methods in ofbiz? It's not entirely consistent across the code base. I would prefer not to use this when it isn't needed, as it introduces an extra keyword into the code.

Re: squareFootage with decimals

According to the Data Model Resource Book, a FACILITY entity stores the attributes or relationships associated with a physical structure. Facility types include warehouse, plant, building, room, office. The type of storage tank I was referring to is one you would see in a tank farm - it could

Re: svn commit: r929073 - /ofbiz/site/index.html

My opinion is strong, I think it should be removed. Things I don't like: - as far as I can tell there has been no activity on the site, even though it has been almost 3 weeks since you first mentioned it - you've received no positive comments from any other committers as far as I am aware - the

Re: squareFootage with decimals

A storage tank might be better modeled as an asset that is located in a facility rather than being a facility itself. BTW, we already have a UOM field to go along with the "squareFootage" field (which is unfortunate that it was done that way, but it's been there for a while now). This isn't a

[jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-3623) XHTML validation errors (framework/widget)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adrian Crum closed OFBIZ-3623. -- Resolution: Fixed Fixed, rev 929173. Thanks Blas! > XHTML validation errors (framework/widget) >

Re: svn commit: r929073 - /ofbiz/site/index.html

On Mar 30, 2010, at 5:25 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Jacopo, Scott, > > What kind of issues do you fear? Actually no fear nor issues: just a bit of confusion. And also it seems to me more natural to test a tool "internally" (i.e. in the dev list) and if we like it then make it official and pu

Re: squareFootage with decimals

Good idea Scott! Taking it one step further, how about supporting volume too? A facility might be a storage tank. -Adrian Scott Gray wrote: If we want it to be a bit more generic we should probably add two new fields: floorArea and floorAreaUomId and then deprecate squareFootage, perhaps with

[jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-2020) Using one Ofbiz instance with multiple databases

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Erwan de FERRIERES closed OFBIZ-2020. - Resolution: Won't Fix A different implementation has been chosen with multitenant > Usin

Re: svn commit: r929073 - /ofbiz/site/index.html

Jacopo, Scott, What kind of issues do you fear? Jacques Scott Gray wrote: I would prefer to keep it off the main page until the community proves that it is something they want by using it, at that point we could consider making it an official resource. I don't want the main page to be a pro

multitenant / multi-delegator

Hi devs, I'm closing this JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2020 : Using one Ofbiz instance with multiple databases Just to know, what was wrong with implementation of the multi-database ? Regards, -- Erwan de FERRIERES www.nereide.biz

Re: squareFootage with decimals

If we want it to be a bit more generic we should probably add two new fields: floorArea and floorAreaUomId and then deprecate squareFootage, perhaps with a migration service to populate the new fields with the data from the old. Regards Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 30/03/20

Re: svn commit: r929073 - /ofbiz/site/index.html

I would prefer to keep it off the main page until the community proves that it is something they want by using it, at that point we could consider making it an official resource. I don't want the main page to be a proving ground for ideas that may or may not work out. Regards Scott On 30/03/2

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3609) XHTML validation errors (product)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Blas Rodriguez Somoza updated OFBIZ-3609: - Attachment: OFBIZ-3609_product_xhtml_v2.diff > XHTML validation errors (product)

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3609) XHTML validation errors (product)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Blas Rodriguez Somoza updated OFBIZ-3609: - Description: XHTML validation errors * Unclosed INPUT or IMG * attribute

Re: svn commit: r929073 - /ofbiz/site/index.html

Actually I'd want to measure what happens from the main site. If there are nothing of few changes it will not be worth to create something in OFBiz. In one month or so we should have an idea about that. Jacques From: "Jacopo Cappellato" Understood. What if, in this testing phase, we remove th

Re: svn commit: r929073 - /ofbiz/site/index.html

Understood. What if, in this testing phase, we remove the reference from the official page of the project and just point to it when needed in conversation in the lists? Jacopo On Mar 30, 2010, at 3:13 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Hi Jacopo, > > Yes that's why I was reluctant to do it. I don't

squareFootage with decimals

Hi, I'd like to allow Facility.squareFootage to support decimals. In order to do that, I need to change the type of the squareFootage field from numeric to fixed-point. I can't see any issues doing that OOTB. But in case this would be a problem for someone I prefer to warn. Jacques

Re: svn commit: r929073 - /ofbiz/site/index.html

Hi Jacopo, Yes that's why I was reluctant to do it. I don't expect much of it. As I said it's much a test than anything else. If it proves useful we could develop something specific for that based on Survey. I think that Ruth is already using Survey on her site. Jacques From: "Jacopo Cappella

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3442) Replace popup lookups by layer lookups

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12851387#action_12851387 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3442: Yes sure Bilgin, I totally agree, that's

  1   2   >