Thanks Jacques..I've merged that patch with my local (latest ofbiz trunk) ;
works well. I've updated the Jira but not sure whether you guys want me to
resubmit the patch then no worries (but it pretty much is the same as the
original patch). lemme know your preferences no worries
--
View this mes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913915#action_12913915
]
frank commented on OFBIZ-3736:
--
Folks I have successfuly tested this patch and merged this wit
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3736
Jacques
From: "frank"
Ok no worries...can you send me the Jira link (sorry I am new to the code
base / tools)?
p.s. might take me a while to resolve this (given i am a newbie) but i will
give it a crack no probs
cheers
frank
--
View this messa
On Sep 22, 2010, at 2:38 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
> On 09/22/2010 03:33 PM, BJ Freeman wrote:
>> Am it to gather by this that you can do a direct SVN update and all your
>> customization continue to work?
>> say from 9.04 to 10.04
>
> Ofbiz has never supported upgrades. I agree with BJ here.
>
>
Yes I don't cover that type of customization,
I copy the component into hot-deploy for simplicity.
then I modify the component I copied.
when an update is done from the svn the original component may get updated.
now I what to know if what I did in my copied component was effected.
Like they remo
On 22/09/2010 09:09, Adam Heath wrote:
> Now, if you were to combine *all* these hosts into one, and then try to
> run it, we might have an issue. But, that's not what is currently
> happening.
Not sure what you mean here. www.a.o and every tlp.a.o site are served
from a single httpd instance (al
Ok no worries...can you send me the Jira link (sorry I am new to the code
base / tools)?
p.s. might take me a while to resolve this (given i am a newbie) but i will
give it a crack no probs
cheers
frank
--
View this message in context:
http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/multi-tenant-delegator-f
hi BJ,
To give an example.
Let say if i wanted to hide some menu items, i comment them out.
When i upgrade this implementation, i need to make sure the modification is
not overriden by newer codes.
If i can hide the menu items just by changing some data in the database,
future upgrades will be ea
not sure where you coming from james
I have stated that all customization is done outside of the SVN image,
by either hot-deploy or a seperate folder(which is what I use) of
components the either override or access the svn image.
and that a automated way to check those customization against th
Hi BJ,
If we customize an application by configuration, upgrades are easier.
If we customize by replacing the codes, upgrades will not be possible.
This means functions / features in OFBiz should be able to turn on / off.
Regards,
James
BJ Freeman wrote:
>
> I disagree. every complicated pr
I disagree. every complicated process is made up of simple processes.
the level you approach it, is what makes it complicated.
An I believe the process can be modeled and implemented.
just as the tests are now, as limited as they are.
what it takes is a commitment by each one that changes the co
Yes I use it. thanks for your effort.
Let me explain further that when I say 50 apps I am not talking about
installations but different applications, Like Real estate(5),
Education(4), Film Industry(6), Restaurants(and bars) (6)
the numbers in parentheses are the vertical apps in the class of a
What I see here is that it is not as easy to create an upgrade system for
this kind of project. Perhaps the nature of it, it's a good reason. Remember
that Ofbiz is an ERP system and tries to cover as much as it can different
businesses, so IMO it's not like a proprietary product or another kind of
On 09/22/2010 05:53 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 09/22/2010 05:44 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: "Adam Heath"
On 09/22/2010 03:33 PM, BJ Freeman wrote:
Am it to gather by this that you can do a direct SVN update and all
your
customization continue to work?
say from 9.04 to 10.04
Ofbiz has nev
On 09/22/2010 05:44 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: "Adam Heath"
On 09/22/2010 03:33 PM, BJ Freeman wrote:
Am it to gather by this that you can do a direct SVN update and all your
customization continue to work?
say from 9.04 to 10.04
Ofbiz has never supported upgrades. I agree with BJ here
From: "Adam Heath"
On 09/22/2010 03:33 PM, BJ Freeman wrote:
Am it to gather by this that you can do a direct SVN update and all your
customization continue to work?
say from 9.04 to 10.04
Ofbiz has never supported upgrades. I agree with BJ here.
Database tables can change. Not all changes
Unable to create project task contents as admin
---
Key: OFBIZ-3952
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3952
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Components: specialpurpose/project
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jeremy Olmstead updated OFBIZ-3952:
---
Attachment: task_content_fix.patch
Patch to fix the incorrect permission check.
> Unable to
I too keep my customizations out of the normal svn path so they don't
get changed.
apparently I have different customizations than you do.
let take a example:
the customization routes to the party profile and expect a certain
action and behavior.
the party profile is changed in a way that the pr
The only "customization" I do is a patch file that changes settings and
comments out unused applications. There have been a few times where the
files being changed were updated in the trunk and I had to update my
patch file accordingly.
I keep custom applications in the hot-deploy folder - whe
glad you see what I am speaking of.
the one thing I said was it would notify the customizer their code at
sos and so needs to be changed.
i agree that such migration automation can not cover all.
however if every new "improvement" is done individually then the task is
not how large, though not
to further this I did state the problem as code changes to a component
and how they effect customization.
to get more granular leads to discussion about that particular problem
but does not address the migration problem for customizations.
=
BJ Freeman
Strategic Power Of
On 09/22/2010 03:33 PM, BJ Freeman wrote:
Am it to gather by this that you can do a direct SVN update and all your
customization continue to work?
say from 9.04 to 10.04
Ofbiz has never supported upgrades. I agree with BJ here.
Database tables can change. Not all changes are automatic. Such
Am it to gather by this that you can do a direct SVN update and all your
customization continue to work?
say from 9.04 to 10.04
Adrian Crum sent the following on 9/22/2010 1:25 PM:
BJ,
That reply is not very informative. Also, your original message makes a
lot of broad generalizations and it d
On 09/22/2010 06:42 AM, BJ Freeman wrote:
I speak not as a voting member of ofbiz but one that has some 50 apps
built on ofbiz.
What is your definition of app? An install of an application? In
that case, we have 50+ server based installs.
However, we only have a few actual custom applicati
BJ,
That reply is not very informative. Also, your original message makes a
lot of broad generalizations and it doesn't specify what changes are
causing a problem and why.
If you want things to improve, you will need to be more specific.
-Adrian
On 9/22/2010 1:18 PM, BJ Freeman wrote:
time
time it takes to move an app to the next "improvement"
Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 9/22/2010 5:46 AM:
Just curious; what are/have been you main stumbling blocks?
Jacques
From: "BJ Freeman"
I speak not as a voting member of ofbiz but one that has some 50 apps
built on ofbiz.
I doubt
portlets are not transparent in the components Help system
--
Key: OFBIZ-3951
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3951
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Components:
Hans and Jacques:
up till now the rule expressed is
dig in yourself or hire someone familiar enough to do the upgrade.
what I am proposing is that when new "improvements" overwrite existing
code, that a migration plan be developed with scripts.
we now have a patches folder that could be used a
On 09/21/2010 05:45 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 09/21/2010 05:15 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
I don't recall the breakdown, the 10M figure
counts total daily traffic. You could look
at Vadim's stats for more details- the bottom
line is that no app that doesn't support static
exports will function as a s
Hi Frank,
No, it seems it's not fixed.
There is a Jira issue opened for this
(http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/multi-tenant-delegator-fix-td2549781.html#a2549781),
you can add your patches there, it would be great!
Cheers,
-
David - dcervera at disid dot com
DiSiD Technologies, S.L. - http
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913615#action_12913615
]
David - DiSiD Technologies commented on OFBIZ-3736:
---
Release Branch 10.04
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3946?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913605#action_12913605
]
Erwan de FERRIERES commented on OFBIZ-3946:
---
hi Pierre,
not speaking about UI, bu
hi Guys,
now that i have a a bit of play with the multi tenant stuff.when
swapping between applications (as a tenant) the delagtor looks reverts back
to the default one ) instead of keeping hold of the tenant delegator (i
noticed a similiar Q was raised in another thread)has this been fix
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913574#action_12913574
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3950:
https://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org/catalo
Categories removing in Product Quick Admin
--
Key: OFBIZ-3950
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3950
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Sub-task
Reporter: Jacques Le Roux
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2330?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux reopened OFBIZ-2330:
Reopened: 2 new cases to handle
> Main task for securing URLs in Freemarker templates files
>
Just curious; what are/have been you main stumbling blocks?
Jacques
From: "BJ Freeman"
I speak not as a voting member of ofbiz but one that has some 50 apps
built on ofbiz.
I doubt if I had know of the way improvements have been implemented and
the work that it would take to upgrade all 50 ap
Hi BJ,
If you have contributions suitable for the general public, count me in.
I know how you feel, i have the same here too.
Again, create Jira issues with patches and sure, me, Jacques and others
will have a look at it.
Regards,
Hans
--
Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz
Myself
I looked and it was confusing and not intuitive on the help
First question from a users point of view
What is a Portal, as I search the page for something that says portal.
So I am interested in help on the User Names
I look at the list and see nothing that refers to User names.
Again I look arou
I speak not as a voting member of ofbiz but one that has some 50 apps
built on ofbiz.
I doubt if I had know of the way improvements have been implemented and
the work that it would take to upgrade all 50 apps I would have chose ofbiz.
In short if you ever expect to have ofbiz be a main stay app f
Have a look in the party profile, which is almost also a portal page.
--
Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz
Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak
Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates.
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 02:22 -0700, BJ Freeman wrote:
> So does this
So does this mean a change in the design of UI for components?
I thought portals were just to be used in myportal and based on roles
and permission build a portal page.
Hans Bakker sent the following on 9/22/2010 1:47 AM:
Yes sure that is the intention.
why would you call that messed up? It
so where is the SFA Help?
I click on Help and get
The My portal application introduction.
Hans Bakker sent the following on 9/22/2010 1:47 AM:
Yes sure that is the intention.
why would you call that messed up? It is a start page of sfa where you
have the calender and can receive email and quick
Yes sure that is the intention.
why would you call that messed up? It is a start page of sfa where you
have the calender and can receive email and quickly create contacts and
leads.
The version you refer too was long ago.
Regards,
Hans
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 01:18 -0700, BJ Freeman w
when you click on the SFA as admin
you get a portal page.
you do not get the message that SFA is not complete.
when you click on Help you get the Portal page help not the SFA help
46 matches
Mail list logo
