[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-4043) Memory leaks in (at least) stable demo

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12971990#action_12971990 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-4043: Thanks Erwan, You upgraded only the trunk

Re: svn commit: r1042542 - in /ofbiz/trunk/applications: accounting/src/org/ofbiz/accounting/tax/ order/data/ order/entitydef/ order/src/org/ofbiz/order/order/ product/entitydef/ product/script/org/of

That's pretty much correct. A product can certainly have some prices with tax included and some without. Keep in mind though that there are possible configurations that will result in invalid (or undesired) numbers coming out the other end, such as a price in a certain currency without tax in

Re: svn commit: r1042542 - in /ofbiz/trunk/applications: accounting/src/org/ofbiz/accounting/tax/ order/data/ order/entitydef/ order/src/org/ofbiz/order/order/ product/entitydef/ product/script/org/of

Hi, Can I check I understand what's going on in lines 394 and onward in the getTaxAdjustments method in TaxAuthorityServices.java? You can choose a price based on any criteria, and that price is passed in the itemPrice parameter to the getTaxAdjustments method. This method looks at the default p

Re: Framework Independence

Not really BJ, there is a consensus on making the framework more (or totally) independent from the applications and specialpurpose components. The only question is the best way to do that, and it looks like as far as a general approach goes (moving minimal needed parts from application componen

Re: Framework Independence

I agree this is the way to go. Certain parts of certain application components should have been in the framework from the beginning, but certainly not all of them. Splitting out those specific parts and putting them in framework components as needed is the way to go. -David On Dec 15, 2010,

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-4043) Memory leaks in (at least) stable demo

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12971849#action_12971849 ] BJ Freeman commented on OFBIZ-4043: --- since the local host work on my machine and the trun

Re: Framework Independence

the pattern of having the entities and services specific to a component will be broken. so a test file in each folder about were the entities and services are should be included. you can take the webapp/content/docbooks and put in common since it is standalone engine for created docbooks outpu

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-4043) Memory leaks in (at least) stable demo

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12971842#action_12971842 ] Erwan de FERRIERES commented on OFBIZ-4043: --- Jacques, I just upgraded the Derby

Re: Framework Independence

I agree. It possible to split content to framework component and keep functionnal on application but I think this operation It's not easy and I haven't suggest how do this. Nicolas Le 15/12/2010 20:15, Adrian Crum a écrit : At first glance it looks that way. All we really need in the framework

Re: Framework Independence

I'm guessing you'd also need ContentWorker and DataResourceWorker. Regards Scott On 16/12/2010, at 8:15 AM, Adrian Crum wrote: > At first glance it looks that way. All we really need in the framework are > the content entities and their CRUD services. > > -Adrian > > On 12/15/2010 11:04 AM, S

Re: Framework Independence

At first glance it looks that way. All we really need in the framework are the content entities and their CRUD services. -Adrian On 12/15/2010 11:04 AM, Scott Gray wrote: I really think you'd need to split the content component into two, simply moving it to the framework would probably introd

Re: Framework Independence

I really think you'd need to split the content component into two, simply moving it to the framework would probably introduce a whole other set of dependencies to deal with. Regards Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 16/12/2010, at 7:40 AM, Adrian Crum wrote: > To clarify, I'm t

Re: Framework Independence

I don't think you will find a consensus so just need to branch your own frame work as I did. = BJ Freeman Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation Specialtymarket.com

Re: Framework Independence

To clarify, I'm trying to get the components in the framework folder to run by themselves - without the components found in the applications folder. Some of the framework components have UIs. I understand everyone has a different opinion on what constitutes a framework, so I don't want to reha

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-4060) Bug In Jquery Integration - js File Not Found

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12971770#action_12971770 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-4060: It should be normally handled by this snip

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-4060) Bug In Jquery Integration - js File Not Found

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-4060: --- Issue Type: Sub-task (was: Bug) Parent: OFBIZ-3814 > Bug In Jquery Integration - js

Re: Framework Independence

On Dec 15, 2010, at 6:52 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: > I'm working on a project that requires only the OFBiz framework. I'm trying > to get a framework-only installation to run. > > There are a lot of dependencies on the party and content components. Removing > dependencies on the party component sh

Re: Framework Independence

first question is should there be any UI activity at the framework level. Should not it just be the support to allow a UI system to put installed. when I mean UI I am talking about any interaction to the user. = BJ Freeman Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation

[jira] Created: (OFBIZ-4060) Bug In Jquery Integration - js File Not Found

Bug In Jquery Integration - js File Not Found - Key: OFBIZ-4060 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4060 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: framework Affects Vers

Re: admin User Login and Framework Only Demo Installation

I agree that if you successfully load demo data (ant run-install) in a framework only setup, the demo admin user should be there as well. Jacopo On Dec 15, 2010, at 5:42 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: > Oops, I meant the admin user login demo data is loaded in > applications/securityext. > > On 12/15

Framework Independence

I'm working on a project that requires only the OFBiz framework. I'm trying to get a framework-only installation to run. There are a lot of dependencies on the party and content components. Removing dependencies on the party component should be fairly easy. The online help system uses the cont

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-4057) Birt Reports of latest version is not compatible with current BIrt integration

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12971725#action_12971725 ] Erwan de FERRIERES commented on OFBIZ-4057: --- Hi Chirag, could you include your r

Re: admin User Login and Framework Only Demo Installation

Oops, I meant the admin user login demo data is loaded in applications/securityext. On 12/15/2010 8:32 AM, Adrian Crum wrote: I noticed that the admin user login demo data is loaded in applications/commonext. That prevents an admin from logging into a framework-only demo installation. Is that i

admin User Login and Framework Only Demo Installation

I noticed that the admin user login demo data is loaded in applications/commonext. That prevents an admin from logging into a framework-only demo installation. Is that intentional? If yes, how does one log into a framework-only demo installation? -Adrian

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-4057) Birt Reports of latest version is not compatible with current BIrt integration

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Erwan de FERRIERES updated OFBIZ-4057: -- Assignee: Erwan de FERRIERES > Birt Reports of latest version is not compatible with cu

Re: svn commit: r1049451 - /ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/widget/InvoiceForms.xml

OK, now I better see what you mean. Thank you, Bruno 2010/12/15 Hans Bakker > As far as i can see it is currently not > > if you are on page 2 and press a update/delete button, the system will > show page one again > > Regards, > Hans > > On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 13:51 +0100, Bruno Busco wr

Re: svn commit: r1049451 - /ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/widget/InvoiceForms.xml

As far as i can see it is currently not if you are on page 2 and press a update/delete button, the system will show page one again Regards, Hans On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 13:51 +0100, Bruno Busco wrote: > Why is this needed for this particular form? > Isn't this automatically managed by the

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-4043) Memory leaks in (at least) stable demo

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-4043: --- Attachment: screenshot-2 (Timer thread).jpg > Memory leaks in (at least) stable demo > --

Re: svn commit: r1049451 - /ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/widget/InvoiceForms.xml

Why is this needed for this particular form? Isn't this automatically managed by the from widget? -Bruno 2010/12/15 > Author: hansbak > Date: Wed Dec 15 08:15:49 2010 > New Revision: 1049451 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1049451&view=rev > Log: > preserve viewindex and size in multi

[jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-4059) Links to Nabble mailing list archives broken

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-4059. -- Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Jacques Le Roux Thanks Paul, It's fixed. I finally gave up w

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-4059) Links to Nabble mailing list archives broken

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12971576#action_12971576 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-4059: Hi Jacopo, Yes it's because I just update

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-4059) Links to Nabble mailing list archives broken

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12971570#action_12971570 ] Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-4059: -- They are working for me. Can you pleas