Hans -
These are all 100% applicable to ofbiz, as the project is lacking in these way.
The reason I offered the web walk through was to see firsthand some of these.
- Lon
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: Hans Bakker
Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2011 20:34:03
To:
Ofbiz looks like exactly what I need for an upcoming project (thanks all for
that) and I will need multi-tenant behaviour to the ecommerce side if it's
not there.
https://cwiki.apache.org/OFBIZ/multitenancy-support.html states that:
"Currently the Ecommerce for Tenants is not supported."
Qu
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder ofbiz-trunk while
building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/2206
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu
Build Reason: scheduler
Build Source St
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder ofbiz-trunk while building
ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/2205
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu
Build Reason: scheduler
Build Source Stamp
Jacques, all,
I did a series of changes (rev. 1180638) to the text and formatting of the
"Download" page and now it should be easier to understand what to download and
how things are structured; I have tried to incorporate your feedback.
When you can, please have a look (and a double look to typ
Thank you Lon,
but these the more general advantages, could you please tell us how the
ofbiz project will be better with maven2? Is it worth switching to it?
Regards,
hans
On Sun, 2011-10-09 at 09:29 -0400, Lon Binder wrote:
> Numbering just for discussion (no priority):
>
>1. Order of magn
Numbering just for discussion (no priority):
1. Order of magnitude better dependency management
1. Self-documenting JAR references
2. Less JARs need direct references (sub-dependencies will be pulled
automatically)
3. Internal project dependencies clearer
4. The de
Hi Lon,
could you please tell us what the advantage is of this exercise no using
maven2?
Regards,
Hans
On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 16:11 -0400, Lon Binder wrote:
> I know Maven has been discussed briefly in the past, but we have gone ahead
> full force with it locally. We have converted the entire OF
