Jacques,
could you please help me to understand all the changes you did around JMS? I
see some issues (e.g. the value of ServiceDispatcher.enableJMS is ignored) and
reviewing the history of commits I have seen that you have committed changes,
then fixed them (partially reverting?) but all in al
Thanks for spotting this, corrected in r 1352774
The reason for these changes is that ACCOUNTING_ADMIN really can do
everything in the accounting manager and that not many different
permissions are required.
Regards,
Hans
On 06/22/2012 11:43 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Jun 22, 2012, at
Yes these were intentional because they are now covered by the
account_admin permission.
On 06/22/2012 11:46 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Hans,
I did only a cursory review but I don't understand the reason for the removal
of the rntries below... was it intentional?
Regards,
Jacopo
On Jun 2
Hans,
I did only a cursory review but I don't understand the reason for the removal
of the rntries below... was it intentional?
Regards,
Jacopo
On Jun 22, 2012, at 6:12 AM, hans...@apache.org wrote:
> Modified:
> ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/data/AccountingSecurityGroupDemoData.xml
>
On Jun 22, 2012, at 6:04 AM, hans...@apache.org wrote:
> // security check
> -if (!security.hasEntityPermission("MANUAL", "_PAYMENT", userLogin)) {
> +if (!security.hasEntityPermission("MANUAL", "_PAYMENT", userLogin)
> && !security.hasEntityPermission("MANUAL", "_PAYMENT
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder ofbiz-trunk while
building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/3215
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: portunus_ubuntu
Build Reason: scheduler
Build Sourc
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder ofbiz-trunk while building
ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/3214
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: portunus_ubuntu
Build Reason: scheduler
Build Source S
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13398492#comment-13398492
]
Martin Kaiser commented on OFBIZ-4906:
--
Yes, this could be an improvement.
But I thi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13398450#comment-13398450
]
Adrian Crum edited comment on OFBIZ-4906 at 6/21/12 2:48 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13398450#comment-13398450
]
Adrian Crum commented on OFBIZ-4906:
To make what I'm proposing clearer, I can use a s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13398445#comment-13398445
]
Adrian Crum commented on OFBIZ-4906:
That type of difference is worth discussing. Some
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13398437#comment-13398437
]
Martin Kaiser commented on OFBIZ-4906:
--
I contributed the files with the translations
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christian Geisert reassigned OFBIZ-4906:
Assignee: Christian Geisert
> More german translations
> --
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder ofbiz-trunk while
building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/3212
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: portunus_ubuntu
Build Reason: scheduler
Build Sourc
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder ofbiz-trunk while building
ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/3211
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: portunus_ubuntu
Build Reason: scheduler
Build Source S
Implemented as discussed with revision:
r1352431 | hansbak | 2012-06-21 14:21:49 +0700 (Thu, 21 Jun 2012) | 2 lines
split up securitypermissions as seed data and securitygroups as demo
data with a single exception: the creation of a super security group
which has general access to the system a
16 matches
Mail list logo
