[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-5481) [RelationFieldNotFound] warining during startup : parentCustRequestId of entity CustRequest is not found.

Leon created OFBIZ-5481: --- Summary: [RelationFieldNotFound] warining during startup : parentCustRequestId of entity CustRequest is not found. Key: OFBIZ-5481 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5481

Re: Release numbering

On Jan 13, 2014, at 7:27 PM, Pierre Smits wrote: > Last year it was decided by the committers not to do annual releases > anymore as it was too much a burden on the declining number of them. A small but important point: there was no formal vote on this but the general consensus was that, if no

[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-5480) Product Costs page missing lookup controls in creation section

Christian Carlow created OFBIZ-5480: --- Summary: Product Costs page missing lookup controls in creation section Key: OFBIZ-5480 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5480 Project: OFBiz

Re: Release numbering

What 'they' know and whether they can draw parrallels between is a big thing to ask. Better to ask this in the user ML, where you will surely get an answert. And not a person participating in this mailing list, who may not have that indept knowledge. Anyway, 5 years ago there might have been compe

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-4645) creates links without jsessionid for users who have cookies disabled

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4645?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13869665#comment-13869665 ] Pierre Smits commented on OFBIZ-4645: - Is this issue still valid? > creates links wi

[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-5479) Groovy error when trying to filter virtual product feature variants in lookup popup window

Christian Carlow created OFBIZ-5479: --- Summary: Groovy error when trying to filter virtual product feature variants in lookup popup window Key: OFBIZ-5479 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5479

Re: Release numbering

Do you think they don't know about Ubuntu way and they can't draw a parallel between both? I believe OFBiz users are not only savvy but also knowledgeable Anyway, it took me time to convince other devs about it, and I doubt they will want to change back now, in other words, too late, sorry Jacq

Re: Release numbering

Yes, but that is in parts also because you have some knowledge over what happened in which month. Outsiders and people who don't follow the ml as closely do not understand this, however, and have no relation between month and features. To them, i fear, the version numbers are interpreted as major a

Re: svn commit: r1557673 - in /ofbiz/branches/release12.04: ./ .classpath LICENSE framework/base/lib/xpp3-1.1.4c.jar framework/base/lib/xpp3_min-1.1.4c.jar framework/base/lib/xstream-1.3.1.jar framewo

Yet another compelling reason to switch to incorporating more ivy functionalities in future releases. See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5464 Pierre Smits *ORRTIZ.COM * Services & Solutions for Cloud- Based Manufacturing, Professional Services and Retail & Tr

Re: Release numbering

I still prefer the Ubuntu way. It makes sense to me, it adds an information about when the branch was freezed, w/o searching anywhere. Then we need to number minor releases Jacques On Monday, January 13, 2014 1:48 PM, p...@ilscipio.com wrote > Hey, > > truth to be told, i still think that the

Re: Release numbering

+1 for 13.07 Jacques On Monday, January 13, 2014 12:01 PM, jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote > I would prefer to keep the current format because the issue is minor and to > avoid changes in the middle of release histories; if > we really want to switch to this then we could do only for new

Re: svn commit: r1557673 - in /ofbiz/branches/release12.04: ./ .classpath LICENSE framework/base/lib/xpp3-1.1.4c.jar framework/base/lib/xpp3_min-1.1.4c.jar framework/base/lib/xstream-1.3.1.jar framewo

It was only in License (still unsure how/why), done, thanks Jacques On Monday, January 13, 2014 1:30 PM, adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com wrote > The classpath entry for xpp3-1.1.4c.jar wasn't changed. > > Adrian Crum > Sandglass Software > www.sandglass-software.com > > On 1/13/2014 4:56 AM,

Re: Release numbering

Hey, truth to be told, i still think that the current version numbering is not understandable for outsiders. I understand that the version numbers relate to year and month, but all in all, it is not really major releases we do each year. The community simply cannot handle multiple versions a year,

Re: svn commit: r1557673 - in /ofbiz/branches/release12.04: ./ .classpath LICENSE framework/base/lib/xpp3-1.1.4c.jar framework/base/lib/xpp3_min-1.1.4c.jar framework/base/lib/xstream-1.3.1.jar framewo

The classpath entry for xpp3-1.1.4c.jar wasn't changed. Adrian Crum Sandglass Software www.sandglass-software.com On 1/13/2014 4:56 AM, jler...@apache.org wrote: Author: jleroux Date: Mon Jan 13 09:56:22 2014 New Revision: 1557673 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1557673 Log: "Applied fix from trun

Re: Release numbering

I would prefer to keep the current format because the issue is minor and to avoid changes in the middle of release histories; if we really want to switch to this then we could do only for new branches (e.g. 13.07). Jacopo On Jan 13, 2014, at 11:27 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Hi, > > Just

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-5478) Form pagination failes if total length of search condition is more than about 2~3k bytes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13869416#comment-13869416 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-5478: Good idea to keep the GET also, very usef

buildbot success in ASF Buildbot on ofbiz-branch12

The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder ofbiz-branch12 while building ASF Buildbot. Full details are available at: http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-branch12/builds/193 Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: portunus_ubuntu Build Reason: scheduler Build

Release numbering

Hi, Just got a doubt, would it not be better if we would not put a 0 ahead of the minor release number? Not a big deal, but it could be confused with a date. So I would have better R12.04.3 than R12.04.03, do you think it's worth the move? Jacques

buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on ofbiz-branch12

The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder ofbiz-branch12 while building ASF Buildbot. Full details are available at: http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-branch12/builds/192 Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: portunus_ubuntu Build Reason: scheduler Build Sou

[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-5478) Form pagination failes if total length of search condition is more than about 2~3k bytes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Leon updated OFBIZ-5478: Attachment: OFBIZ-5478.patch > Form pagination failes if total length of search condition is more than about > 2~3

[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-5478) Form pagination failes if total length of search condition is more than about 2~3k bytes

Leon created OFBIZ-5478: --- Summary: Form pagination failes if total length of search condition is more than about 2~3k bytes Key: OFBIZ-5478 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5478 Project: OFBiz

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-5409) JSON Response does not set http status on error

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5409?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13869362#comment-13869362 ] Gareth Carter commented on OFBIZ-5409: -- Excellent. Well done Jacques. I think the ori