[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-5840) Create bootstrap theme

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14228125#comment-14228125 ] Ejaz Ahmed commented on OFBIZ-5840: --- I have tested lookup field and it is working now. H

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-5706) Parties can't be assigned to production run tasks

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5706?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14228122#comment-14228122 ] Pierre Smits commented on OFBIZ-5706: - I know. I have a solution available, but was no

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-5706) Parties can't be assigned to production run tasks

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5706?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14228088#comment-14228088 ] Swapnil Shah commented on OFBIZ-5706: - [~pfm.smits] We can try leveraging upon WORK_EF

Re: Suggest branch rather than release strategy?

Sounds like a good idea. What do you need from Sharan and I in terms of documentation support and space in the wiki for project management, functional documentation and marketing/promotional details. Any suggestions about wiki structure for this as a separate sub-project? Ron On 27/11/2014 1

Re: Suggest branch rather than release strategy?

That sounds like a good enough solution to me Jacques Le 27/11/2014 19:41, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : This is a good point. We could find a way to programmatically enable/disable the components just for the test run: ./ant -Denable-all=true clean-all load-demo run-tests but this is just an

[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-5840) Create bootstrap theme

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gavin Mabie updated OFBIZ-5840: --- Attachment: bootified_js_screentrans.patch Hi I've added/modified the bootified.js to handle screen t

Re: Suggest branch rather than release strategy?

In an ideal world (according to me), - we should follow the Apache models or precedents since they seem to work for a large number of Apache projects. - the individual projects would have their own committers who may or may not commit to the core or framework. Perhaps someone can look into how

Re: OFBiz End User Docs Home

Can we clean up that space by: a) removing the stuff that is no good - does anyone feel comfortable in making that determination. b) organize the remaining content so that it is easy to navigate c) fix the text so that it is clearer about what information can be counted on by the new user (remo

Re: Suggest branch rather than release strategy?

This is a good point. We could find a way to programmatically enable/disable the components just for the test run: ./ant -Denable-all=true clean-all load-demo run-tests but this is just an idea; we could figure out the best way to go. Jacopo On Nov 27, 2014, at 7:14 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:

Re: Suggest branch rather than release strategy?

Be aware that disabling a component does two things: 1. Speeds up unit tests because the disabled component is excluded from them. 2. Increases the chance of regressions because the disabled component is not being tested. Adrian Crum Sandglass Software www.sandglass-software.com On 11/27/201

Re: Suggest branch rather than release strategy?

Yes, of course. Adrian Crum Sandglass Software www.sandglass-software.com On 11/27/2014 5:54 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Just one thing is not clear to me: still based on OFBiz I guess? Jacques Le 27/11/2014 18:33, Adrian Crum a écrit : I think the term "separate project" is self-explanatory.

Re: Suggest branch rather than release strategy?

Just one thing is not clear to me: still based on OFBiz I guess? Jacques Le 27/11/2014 18:33, Adrian Crum a écrit : I think the term "separate project" is self-explanatory. Adrian Crum Sandglass Software www.sandglass-software.com On 11/27/2014 5:28 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: You mean outsid

Re: Suggest branch rather than release strategy?

Le 27/11/2014 18:41, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : On Nov 27, 2014, at 6:25 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >Yes, so we need to define which are those components. So 3 points, which should be discussed separately it seems, not sure of the order yet but probably this one >1) Components to move to

Re: Suggest branch rather than release strategy?

On Nov 27, 2014, at 6:25 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Yes, so we need to define which are those components. So 3 points, which > should be discussed separately it seems, not sure of the order yet but > probably this one > 1) Components to move to Attic. They will be freezed but still availabl

Re: Suggest branch rather than release strategy?

On Nov 27, 2014, at 6:25 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Do we want to keep all current components (some disabled) until we decide > those which should go to Attic? For instance we already kind of spoke about > appserver going to Attic. > This could be decided before for some components; the les

Re: Suggest branch rather than release strategy?

I think the term "separate project" is self-explanatory. Adrian Crum Sandglass Software www.sandglass-software.com On 11/27/2014 5:28 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: You mean outside of OFBiz? As a sub-project like suggested Ron? Or in Github or something like that? Jacques Le 27/11/2014 16:31, Ad

Re: OFBiz End User Docs Home

That sounds like a smart 1st move to me. People who tend to use search (I do) would not be dispossessed Jacques Le 27/11/2014 16:52, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : We could start by removing the links to it from the OFBiz website: if (ever) the content will be validated we will re-add them. Jac

Re: Suggest branch rather than release strategy?

Le 27/11/2014 16:30, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : On Nov 27, 2014, at 3:16 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hi Jacopo, I looked a bit back. Even if it's not clearly related I trace this back to the slim-down effort. We can forget it since nobody never complained (pfew...). Then you proposed to m

Re: Suggest branch rather than release strategy?

You mean outside of OFBiz? As a sub-project like suggested Ron? Or in Github or something like that? Jacques Le 27/11/2014 16:31, Adrian Crum a écrit : I would be willing to spin off Asset Maintenance to a separate project. I was thinking it could be a good test-run of the concept. Adrian Cr

Re: OFBiz End User Docs Home

We could start by removing the links to it from the OFBiz website: if (ever) the content will be validated we will re-add them. Jacopo On Nov 27, 2014, at 4:04 PM, Ron Wheeler wrote: > Is there anything of value here or should we just delete the space and remove > any references to it. > > h

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-5840) Create bootstrap theme

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14227760#comment-14227760 ] Adrian Crum commented on OFBIZ-5840: Fixed in rev 1642177. Thanks Ejaz! > Create boot

Re: OFBiz End User Docs Home

This certainly needs to be revisited but I'd surely not drop it like that! Jacques Le 27/11/2014 16:04, Ron Wheeler a écrit : Is there anything of value here or should we just delete the space and remove any references to it. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBENDUSER/OFBiz+End+Us

Re: ATP not automatic decrease when a order is created

+1 database technology changes but business level constraints are permanent (most of the time) and are usually tied to the real world not technology. On 27/11/2014 10:10 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: hmmm... in a complex system like OFBiz there are so many configuration constraints (even span

Re: ATP not automatic decrease when a order is created

Yes, that's another good solution (though less general, I always prefer to cut issues at their roots. But I must admit I have, at the moment, no time to contribute a change at the Entity Engine level :/ ) I will create a Jira for both solutions (2 Jira issues I mean). Better to keep track of id

Re: Suggest branch rather than release strategy?

I would be willing to spin off Asset Maintenance to a separate project. I was thinking it could be a good test-run of the concept. Adrian Crum Sandglass Software www.sandglass-software.com On 11/27/2014 2:16 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hi Jacopo, I looked a bit back. Even if it's not clearly r

Re: Suggest branch rather than release strategy?

On Nov 27, 2014, at 3:16 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Hi Jacopo, > > I looked a bit back. Even if it's not clearly related I trace this back to > the slim-down effort. We can forget it since nobody never complained > (pfew...). > > Then you proposed to move some component from specialpurpos

Re: ATP not automatic decrease when a order is created

hmmm... in a complex system like OFBiz there are so many configuration constraints (even spanning data on different tables) that we will always need to enforce them at the business layer: I don't see a big value in adding this constraint at the db layer. We should instead, in my opinion, impleme

OFBiz End User Docs Home

Is there anything of value here or should we just delete the space and remove any references to it. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBENDUSER/OFBiz+End+User+Docs+Home It appears that it has not be touched since 2006 (8 years ago) and it is of no use at all to new end users in its

Re: Suggest branch rather than release strategy?

Le 27/11/2014 15:16, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : For CMSSITE I'm unsure, but it's interesting for the online help (too bad BJ is no longer with us) BTWcmssite/cms/APACHE_OFBIZ_HTML is no longer working (was still in August in tr

Re: ATP not automatic decrease when a order is created

Even though it makes sense, we could maybe add a constraint for that in DB. Unfortunately I don't think this possibility already exists in OFBiz and it depends on DBMS http://www.w3schools.com/sql/sql_check.asp <> We could create a Jira and fill the gap when we get a chance, opinions? Jacques

Re: Suggest branch rather than release strategy?

Hi Jacopo, I looked a bit back. Even if it's not clearly related I trace this back to the slim-down effort. We can forget it since nobody never complained (pfew...). Then you proposed to move some component from specialpurpose to extras. As you said, not every people were happy with it (at leas

Re: ATP not automatic decrease when a order is created

Thanks Divesh Dutta very much I have just done follow you and system run as I like On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 7:39 PM, Divesh Dutta wrote: > Hi Hoan dang van, > > isImmediatelyFulfilled and reserveInvetory flags are mutually exclusive, > i.e if isImmediatelyFulfilled is set to "Y" then reserveInve

Re: ATP not automatic decrease when a order is created

Hi Hoan dang van, isImmediatelyFulfilled and reserveInvetory flags are mutually exclusive, i.e if isImmediatelyFulfilled is set to "Y" then reserveInventory should always set to "N" and vice versa. So for web stores/e-commerce stores settings should be : isImmediatelyFulfilled = N reserveInvento

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-5844) Convert java files to EntityQuery

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14227543#comment-14227543 ] Ashish Vijaywargiya commented on OFBIZ-5844: Thanks Rishi, Your changes are co

[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-5844) Convert java files to EntityQuery

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rishi Solanki updated OFBIZ-5844: - Attachment: OFBIZ-5844-bug.patch PFA. > Convert java files to EntityQuery > -

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-5844) Convert java files to EntityQuery

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14227528#comment-14227528 ] Rishi Solanki commented on OFBIZ-5844: -- [~toashishvijay] / [~arun.patidar]: Getting e

Problem about returning product and refunding money to customer in POS component

Hi everybody I have just a problem about returning product and refunding money to customer in POS component of OFBiz. I have created an order which contains the items with negative quantity. Total due is also negative number. When I pressed "pay" and "finish" buttons, I went into order component a

Re: ATP not automatic decrease when a order is created

Hi Rishi Solanki Yes, I'm using OFBIZ trunk. This is my product store xml However, when I completed order form webpos component (status of order is completed), the quantity of items which I had bought before is imported into " Ordered", instead of "Ship request". On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 5:34 PM,

[jira] [Closed] (OFBIZ-4540) Item Issuance does not work with MARKETING_PKG_PICK order items

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4540?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ashish Vijaywargiya closed OFBIZ-4540. -- Resolution: Duplicate Based on Divesh's recent comment we can close this issue. Thanks D

[jira] [Assigned] (OFBIZ-4540) Item Issuance does not work with MARKETING_PKG_PICK order items

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4540?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ashish Vijaywargiya reassigned OFBIZ-4540: -- Assignee: Ashish Vijaywargiya > Item Issuance does not work with MARKETING_PKG_

[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-3497) using date-time type="time" shouldn't display a textbox for a date

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Harsh Vijaywargiya updated OFBIZ-3497: -- Attachment: training.png > using date-time type="time" shouldn't display a textbox for a

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-4540) Item Issuance does not work with MARKETING_PKG_PICK order items

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4540?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14227484#comment-14227484 ] Divesh Dutta commented on OFBIZ-4540: - Verified this issue on latest OFBiz trunk. Foll

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-3497) using date-time type="time" shouldn't display a textbox for a date

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14227486#comment-14227486 ] Harsh Vijaywargiya commented on OFBIZ-3497: --- This issue seems to be resolved now