Re: svn commit: r1794937 - /ofbiz/ofbiz-plugins/trunk/lucene/config/lucene.properties

Done, A subtask of OFBIZ-6164 registered. Best regards, Pierre Smits ORRTIZ.COM OFBiz based solutions & services OFBiz Extensions Marketplace http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 6:45 PM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Then i

Re: svn commit: r1794937 - /ofbiz/ofbiz-plugins/trunk/lucene/config/lucene.properties

Then it's not related to this commit, and was not working before. It's only the name of the folder which changed. Please investigate Thanks Jacques Le 12/05/2017 à 18:11, Pierre Smits a écrit : Hi Jacques, This does not work in a multi-tenancy setup of OFBiz. Pierre Smits ORRTIZ.COM

Re: svn commit: r1794937 - /ofbiz/ofbiz-plugins/trunk/lucene/config/lucene.properties

Hi Jacques, This does not work in a multi-tenancy setup of OFBiz. Pierre Smits ORRTIZ.COM OFBiz based solutions & services OFBiz Extensions Marketplace http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 9:15 AM, wrote: > Author: jleroux > Date: Fri May 12 07:15:59

Re: Preparing the new release 16.11.02

I split the tools with OFBIZ-9256 So I have nothing else important pending and a new release is OK with me Jacques Le 11/05/2017 à 11:45, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : I'd like to split the tools folder, I planned it for months but delayed :/ It's of course not blocking and I have nothing import

Re: Preparing the new release 16.11.02

Le 11/05/2017 à 11:45, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Ah, I'd like to see why the Birt orders reports have disappeared https://s.apache.org/HUdV Jacques Fixed with OFBIZ-9359 Jacques

Jira; when backporting no needs to put also "Upcoming Release"

Hi Jacopo, IIRW you suggested some months ago that when backporting there are no needs to put also "Upcoming Release" in Jira fixed version field. It's implied, right? I changed that accordingly, please check https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/diffpagesbyversion.action?pageId=7766050&s

Re: Validating telecom numbers

Thanks everyone for your suggestions and discussion. I have created a Jira ticket here . -- Best Regards, Suraj Khurana Sr. Enterprise Software Engineer HotWax Systems - *The global leader in innovative enterprise c

Re: Proposal: remove fk constraints on Visitor/Visit/ServerHit* entities

On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 8:38 PM, Deepak Dixit < deepak.di...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > Make sense Michael, > > Its good idea to not to define new datasource for new group to avoid > unnecessary complexity, > will add this group in delegator group mapping and set the default > datasource for new