Hi Gil,
Are we sure there is not a test issue with this commit?
Locally I can't reproduce the same but I have also 4 failures, could you please
check on your side?
Thanks
Jacques
Le 28/12/2018 à 15:28, build...@apache.org a écrit :
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder ofbizTru
I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17513 also for tests
Le 28/12/2018 à 15:58, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Thanks Nicolas,
Soon we will need to create the Buildbot build for this branch
I just created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10752 for that
Jacques
Le 28/12
oh Merci !
I knew I missed a part of it :)
Thanks Jacques
On 28/12/2018 15:58, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Thanks Nicolas,
Soon we will need to create the Buildbot build for this branch
I just created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10752 for that
Jacques
Le 28/12/2018 à 15:36, nma..
I think Jiras would fit ;)
Jacques
Le 28/12/2018 à 15:48, Nicolas Malin a écrit :
Thanks all for your comments,
I created release18.12 at r1849861 for framework and r1849862 for plugins.
Rest to update website, prepare the release17.12 as stable and publish the
17.12.01 but sure on the next
Thanks Nicolas,
Soon we will need to create the Buildbot build for this branch
I just created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10752 for that
Jacques
Le 28/12/2018 à 15:36, nma...@apache.org a écrit :
Author: nmalin
Date: Fri Dec 28 14:36:11 2018
New Revision: 1849861
URL: http://s
Thanks all for your comments,
I created release18.12 at r1849861 for framework and r1849862 for plugins.
Rest to update website, prepare the release17.12 as stable and publish
the 17.12.01 but sure on the next year :)
Nicolas
On 28/12/2018 11:10, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
I agree that to pro
Hello,
There is a very nice contribution from Mathieu Lirzin about refactoring
EntityCondition class hierarchy, to make it more legit and
understandable.
It is well documented and validated against integration test and basic
usage
This lies in OFBIZ-10691 Jira, if you want to have a look, i will
I agree that to proceed and create the branch now and then, over the next
few months, as a community we will refine our strategy and even decide on
which of the various branches we should focus on more.
Jacopo
On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 1:59 PM Michael Brohl
wrote:
> Yes, that would be a solution
Hello
On 27/12/2018 13:49, Michael Brohl wrote:
Yes, that would be a solution.
I'm also fine if we would do a 19.x branch. For the future, we could
aim to have a release more towards the middle of the year to avoid
last-minute branching between Christmas and New Year ;-)
The above would fit
