some kind other people can have a look and confirm or not that I can
push it on trunk !
Thanks,
Nicolas
[1] https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/pull/833
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-13133
d not for the reason do to that)
After that the project will extensive changes to break the cyclic
dependencies.
Thank you for your confidence.
I hope we can make OFBiz great for everyone.
Yeah the reason for each to be here :) and a pleasure to share with you
on it !
Nicolas
Regards,
Eugen
Thanks Jacques !
I currently check the different change to do on CI , because I follow
your and Dan works so far :(
Nicolas
Le 11/09/2024 à 17:07, jler...@apache.org a écrit :
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
jleroux pushed a commit to branch master
in
The vote was successful with 8 positive votes and no negative votes.
Thank you,
Nicolas
Le 06/09/2024 à 14:28, Nicolas Malin a écrit :
This is the vote thread to create the next stable branch
"release24.09" from the current trunk
If you need more information, please refer to this
+1
Nicolas
Le 06/09/2024 à 14:28, Nicolas Malin a écrit :
This is the vote thread to create the next stable branch
"release24.09" from the current trunk
If you need more information, please refer to this thread [1]
Vote:
[ +1] create the next stable branch "release24.09&qu
This is the vote thread to create the next stable branch "release24.09" from
the current trunk
If you need more information, please refer to this thread [1]
Vote:
[ +1] create the next stable branch "release24.09"
[ -+0] feel free
[ -1] do not create the branch
This vote is open for at least 5
rk to do on the trunk :D
If there are no major objection, I'll put the release24 branch creation
to the vote in a few days.
Nicolas
[1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/k903dobd1z0hm9qxo3prn8gzc71jrnx1
+1
Sign OK, OFBiz test OK on
Linux 6.1.0-22-amd64 #Debian 6.1.94-1
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM Temurin-11.0.21+9
Nicolas
Le 31/08/2024 à 08:46, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
This is the second vote thread to publish "Apache OFBiz 18.12.16", the 16th
release from the release18.12 br
+1
Sign OK, ofbiz test OK on
Linux 6.1.0-22-amd64 #Debian 6.1.94-1
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM Temurin-11.0.21+9
Nicolas
Le 28/08/2024 à 12:35, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
This is the vote thread to publish "Apache OFBiz 18.12.16", the 16th
release from the release18.12 branch.
T
Hello Jacques,
Do you need some help to move forward on this subject ?
Nicolas
Le 28/03/2024 à 10:05, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi,
Without negative answer this week, I'll set the 2.3.33 version on
trunk next week
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12935
TIA (for your test
Hello,
Why don't create the release branch now ?
Nicolas
Le 21/04/2024 à 15:49, Michael Brohl a écrit :
Hi everyone,
we agreed to work towards a stabilizing trunk to be able to create a
24.x release branch, which means we have to thoroughly decide which
changes should go into trunk.
+1
Work well on debian 12.5 with openjdk version "11.0.21" 2023-10-17
Nicolas
Le 30/04/2024 à 17:06, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
This is the vote thread to publish "Apache OFBiz 18.12.13", the thirteenth
release from the release18.12 branch.
The release files can be
Hi,
Thanks Gaetan to push this subject.
If we want keep OFBiz up to date, hence we need to realize this big step.
My preference go to freeze this migration, focus to release the next
stable branch (24.xx) and restart it after.
Nicolas
Le 10/04/2024 à 14:27, Gaetan a écrit :
Hi all. I&#
Thanks both for your work and analyze !
I agree on the first point, we need to move forward to release the next
OFBiz version and after we can breaking the wall :D
If the person are present at the eu apachecon it would be nice place to
start a workshop on face to face ?
Nicolas
Le 27/02
.
Nicolas
Le 13/03/2024 à 10:55, Daniel Watford a écrit :
Hi Michael,
I'm very keen to see how the REST API component has been progressing. Do
you think it could be added to ofbiz-framework soon so that we could get a
version incorporated in the 24.x release?
One feature that I think would be u
No problem Jacopo,
Thanks for your work and time both !
Nicolas
Le 13/02/2024 à 08:46, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
I'd like to cancel this vote in order to prepare a new tentative
release that includes the latest commits by Jacques.
Thank you all for your votes and I apologize fo
+1
Checksum OK
Load test OK
On Linux 6.1.0-15-amd64, Debian 12 and OpenJDK Runtime Environment
Temurin-11.0.21+9
Thanks !
Nicolas
Le 08/02/2024 à 14:29, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
This is the vote thread, second attempt, to publish "Apache OFBiz
18.12.12", twelfth
releas
Severity: important
Affected versions:
- Apache OFBiz through 18.12.10
Description:
Arbitrary file properties reading vulnerability in Apache Software Foundation
Apache OFBiz when user operates an uri call without authorizations.
The same uri can be operated to realize a SSRF attack also wit
+1
* signature OK
* ./gradlew cleanAll test loadAll testIntegration' OK
Revision: 42e59c2484a49702234030881640aa8d8bfa6d43
JVM: 11.0.18 (Debian 11.0.18+10-post-Debian-1deb11u1)
OS: Linux 6.1.0-10-amd64 amd64
Nicolas
Le 16/12/2023 à 11:02, Jacopo Cappellato a
Hello Michael,
If I understood well, you propose to rename the 22.01 on 24.0.1.01 to
be more synchronize with it releasing time ? If is no worries with this
but what the name for the branch to stabilization ?
Cheers,
Nicolas
Le 08/12/2023 à 17:53, Michael Brohl a écrit :
Hi Nicolas
,
Nicolas
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12726
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12868
--
logoNrd <https://nereide.fr/>
Nicolas Malin
The apache way <http://theapacheway.com/> : *Charity* Apache’s mission
is providing software for the public goo
+1
* Signature OK
* ofbiz test with openjdk version "11.0.18" 2023-01-17 on debian 12.1 OK
Cheers,
Nicolas
Le 27/11/2023 à 11:48, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
This is the vote thread to publish "Apache OFBiz 18.12.10", tenth
release from the release18.12 branch.
The
Hi Jacques,
Thanks for your confirmation.
I pushed the deprecation with the end of ContentServices.xml :D [1]
On step more.
Nicolas
[1]
https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/commit/6b00446509dc0c1dd079cb098f6c3764a6d63f85
On 27/05/2023 09:50, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi Nicolas,
For
+1
Test ok on debian bulleye (11.7) and openjdk 11.0.18 2023-01-17
Nicolas
On 2023/05/26 09:33:18 Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
> This is the vote thread to publish "Apache OFBiz 18.12.08", eighth
> release from the release18.12 branch.
>
> The release files can be downloa
source'
The second assocContent create an association between to content like
createContentAssoc, the difference is it call checkAssocPermission,
service with a Todo : ``.
If someone can check and confirm (or not) my proposal, it'll mostly
appreciate :)
Nicolas
[1] OFBIZ-
eption("Event did not return a
String result, it returned a " + result.getClass().getName());
}
return (String) result;
If I understand well the problematic, move the return to Map, and
improve GroovyEventHandler to support the groovy script return (better
tha
Hello Daniel,
I will take care on it during the week.
Nicolas
On 25/02/2023 10:36, Daniel Watford wrote:
Hello Committers,
We need your help!
We have a very large, but hopefully simple, PR that we need to review -
https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/pull/517
This PR alters OFBIz
ne by the example.
So good reason to improve the code by good refactoring :)
Nicolas
On 07/02/2023 23:34, Daniel Watford wrote:
Hello,
While reading through BalanceSheet.groovy - the script used to prepare data
used during the rendering of the Accounting Balance Sheet report - I found
that
Thanks Jacques !
On 27/01/2023 18:57, jler...@apache.org wrote:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
jleroux pushed a commit to branch trunk
in repositoryhttps://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz-framework.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/tru
Hi,
Thanks Daniel for your note sharing.
It's really nice and sure will helpful to understand the permission logic.
On first read, I didn't spot something to amend.
Nicolas
On 10/01/2023 15:19, Daniel Watford wrote:
Hello,
As part of testing the porting of InventoryServices from m
es from my part to move forward.
Thanks for the works !
Nicolas
On 22/12/2022 19:02, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi Team,
So far, we have only Michael's, Eugen's and Daniel's opinions about
releasing the 22.01.01 version under Gradle 7.6 and JDK 17 (OFBIZ-12400).
To summarize, Mich
Yeah,
I'm agree for the 22.01,
I'm just disappointed to didn't find the time to present our work on the
new decorator and theme for this release, but sure for the next :)
Nicolas
On 16/12/2022 10:12, Daniel Watford wrote:
Hello,
The ofbiz project recently announced th
se)
* display name, if it is different from the username
Or replay to this message if send to private is disrupting for you.
I'll watch any demand.
In your opinion, I forward this on user list ?
cheers,
Nicolas
[1] https://infra.apache.org/blog/jira-public-signup-disabled.html
[2] http
The OFBiz PMC has invited Leila Mekika as new
committer and we are glad to announce that she have accepted the
nomination.
On behalf of the OFBiz PMC, welcome on board!
+1
Sign ok
Run test ok under Debian 5.10.127-1 (2022-06-30) x86_64 GNU/Linux,
openjdk version "11.0.15" 2022-04-19
Nicolas
On 25/08/2022 10:10, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
This is the vote thread to publish "Apache OFBiz 18.12.06", the sixth and
final release from the relea
Hi Michael,
I totally agree with that. However, the JDK 17 LTS failed to compile on
my local.
I propose to move 8 to 11 as first step and homogenize all server, CI
and documentation next move to the 17 as soon as it's safe.
Nicolas
On 15/07/2022 14:50, Michael Brohl wrote:
Hi Nicola
deb11u1)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 17.0.3+7-Debian-1deb11u1, mixed mode,
sharing)
I will backport your work on trunk for the java 11 and update the
documentation.
For the 17 I suggest to do it only on trunk for the moment.
Nicolas
On 15/07/2022 11:48, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi Nicol
I continue to analyze :)
Jacques already done it on trunk to move the github CI on java 11 [1]
I can backport to release22.01 and update documentation to formalize it
Nicolas
[1]
https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/commit/65c766e0c9ccd4e22a9c57c5e6dd11b1ce8f4006
PS: my previous link
the CI and documentation but to be sure, we move the
release22.01 on java 11 or the LTS 17 ?
Reading you
Nicolas
[1] https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz-framework.git
[2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/fq6q58lv52751t4xlkb17mmwkj4kk8q4
--
logoNrd <https://nereide.fr/>
N
Hello,
I will try soon to open a Jira with migration code on it, so if you take
a look, it would be nice :)
Tks a lot.
Nicolas
On 11/07/2022 20:33, Giulio Speri - MpStyle Srl wrote:
Hi Nicolas,
Thank you for your feedback and I will be happy to help you in the
conversion process. :)
How
conversion without problem, but I like to have some
production data to be ensure that I didn't introduce a regression not
cover by ofbiz test.
My problem, our project don't use the inventory at a correct level, so
if you are available to help me on this testing task it would be great :)
Ni
Sure Jacques,
My problem isn't to improve or not it but more if the way that I suggest
can be confronted with the reasoning of my peers :D
I opened the issue OFBIZ-12652[1] with the code extracted from the
custom site.
Cheers,
Nicolas
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1265
Yes sure Jacques,
I already implement both but before suggest it as code, I preferred to
expose the logic to be sure that we going to on the good way :)
If you confirm that this idea isn't wrong (break pattern or something
like that) I will open the issue to load the code
Cheers,
Nicolas
e operation in the service but more from where the
call is submitted.
Other idea to improve more we can imagine setting the message direclty
from the form
*
...
*
What is your feeling about that ?
Thanks
Nicolas
--
logoNrd <https://nereide.fr/>
No worries Jacques, I revert my local fix commit, you gone faster than me.
What can I do for help, to escape any collision with you ?
Nicolas
On 03/02/2022 10:02, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Le 03/02/2022 à 09:54, jler...@apache.org a écrit :
>> Improved: no functional change, adds a
+1
---
Keys Ok
Test Ok
Under OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (AdoptOpenJDK)(build 25.292-b10, mixed
mode), Debian 11.1
Nicolas
On 10/01/2022 18:56, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
> This is the vote thread to release a new bug fix release for the
> release17.12 branch. This new release, "A
Thanks for your return.
Finally we have no big issue to release it now on the jira, I did it to
didn't forget and realize it in three months :)
Nicolas
On 03/01/2022 11:40, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
> Thank you Nicolas!
> (BTW it is fine to mark as released in Jira the version 18.12.
On 03/01/2022 10:31, Nicolas Malin wrote:
> Jacopo, I can publish to 18.12.05 on jira and open the 18.12.06 if it's
> ok for you
I opened the 18.12.06 and I wait your official announce to release the
18.12.05 (and update the date)
Cheers,
Nicolas
On 03/01/2022 09:52, Nicolas Malin wrote:
> I detected with log test, that the screen xml handler is down.
> On https://localhost:8443/webtools/control/WebtoolsLayoutDemoXml :
> ***
>freemarker.core._MiscTemplateException: Macro "renderContainerEnd" has no
>
+1
---
Keys Ok
Test Ok
Under OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (AdoptOpenJDK)(build 25.292-b10, mixed
mode), Debian 11.1
I detected with log test, that the screen xml handler is down.
On https://localhost:8443/webtools/control/WebtoolsLayoutDemoXml :
***
freemarker.core._MiscTemplateException: Macro
+1
---
Keys Ok
Test Ok
Under OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (AdoptOpenJDK)(build 25.292-b10, mixed
mode), Debian 11.1
Nicolas
On 17/12/2021 10:32, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
> This is the vote thread to release a new bug fix release for the
> release18.12 branch. This new release, "A
Fast and Furious :D
Thanks both your accurate response !
Nicolas
On 12/12/2021 19:12, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
> Thank you all,
>
> The vote was successful with 3 positive votes from PMC members and no
> negative votes.
>
> I am going to proceed with the steps to publish the release.
>
> Jacopo
+1
---
Keys Ok
Test Ok
Under OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (AdoptOpenJDK)(build 25.292-b10, mixed
mode), Debian 11.1
Nicolas
On 12/12/2021 13:14, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
> This is the vote thread to publish "Apache OFBiz 18.12.03", the third
> release from the release18.12 branch.
No it's me, I'm to speed this morning and I made some link error ^^'
The back port is done :)
Nicolas
On 12/12/2021 11:48, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> please ignore my previous email, I got now that you are going to
> backport two different tickets.
&g
+1
Jacopo just wait one hour before create I will backport a trunk fix to
18.12 (OFBIZ-12437, OFBIZ-10695)
Thanks,
Nicolas
On 12/12/2021 11:18, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
> thank you Jacques,
>
> I am preparing the release files and will start the vote today; it may
> be a good idea
it's better!)
* Formalize it to support java 11 and Gradle 6.5
* Formalize that trunk support java 17
Any others suggests or remarks ?
Otherwise I will work on it the next week.
Cheers,
Nicolas
[1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/2tbgmv8jmv5bk5y3g5hco0b3d92ss1tq
--
logoNrd <https
+1
Under linux debian 11.1 and openjdk version "1.8.0_292"
Nicolas
On 17/11/2021 14:05, Giulio Speri - MpStyle Srl wrote:
> +1
>
> /bin/bash ../OFBIZ_TOOLS_REPO/ofbiz-tools/verify-ofbiz-release.sh -a
> apache-ofbiz-18.12.02
> Processing files for release: apache-ofbiz-
Hello Wiebke, welcome aboard !
Nicolas
On 29/10/2021 16:47, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Welcome aboard Wiebke,
>
> Your work is much appreciated!
>
> Jacques
>
> Le 27/10/2021 à 12:57, Aditya Sharma a écrit :
>> The OFBiz PMC has invited Wiebke to become a new committ
:) Thanks Jacopo
Nicolas
On 22/10/2021 00:37, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
> Nice! I can prepare the release files for the vote during the weekend (if
> not tomorrow).
>
> Jacopo
>
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 4:00 PM Nicolas Malin
> wrote:
>
>> My thinks, Lets rock !
>
+1
./gradlew cleanAll loadAll testIntegration
BUILD SUCCESSFUL in 7m 14s
./gradlew check
BUILD SUCCESSFUL in 29s
I didn't reproduce the check style error :(
Nicolas
On 24/10/2021 09:40, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> -1
>
> $ ./verify-ofbiz-release.sh apache-ofbiz-18.12.01.zip
>
My thinks, Lets rock !
I propose to start the vote publication :)
If I can help to prepare anything, I'm available !
Nicolas
On 21/10/2021 15:53, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Actually it should be OK now after last exchange between Nicolas and
> Michael
>
> Le 21/10/2021 à 15:3
years, It's enough time for development team to update their
plugins and specific.
Nicolas
>
> *Long Time Support
>
> Jacques
>
Nice, thanks for your return.
Can we close the OFBIZ-12171 ?
I propose to wait the benjamin's return on the OFBIZ-12016 [1] on the
fix proposed by Jacques [2] and if we haven't any blocking issue, start
the publish process.
Cheers,
Nicolas
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/O
ailed: Connexion refusée (Connection
refused)
The build call https://plugins.gradle.org/m2 so finally no problem for
us if we believe on gradle community.
Do you confirm my analyze ?
Nicolas
[1] https://blog.gradle.org/jcenter-shutdown
On 12/10/2021 10:24, Michael Brohl wrote:
> Hi Nicolas, a
Hello Michael,
Any chance to work together on it soon ?
Nicolas
On 29/09/2021 09:20, Nicolas Malin wrote:
> Hello Michael,
>
> No problem to resolve these issue before.
>
> Currently for jcenter, I tried to restart from scratch and from my part
> I didn't see any
time to work on it together by VC it would be a pleasure !
Nicolas
On 28/09/2021 18:29, Michael Brohl wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> there a issues which I think should be fixed before an 18.12 release,
> for example the JCenter migration problem [1] or the DiskFileItem
> topic [2].
>
I finished to review all task identify as available to merge before
release the 18.12.
>From my part test integration suite is ok with plugin, so I think we are
ready to start the publish process :)
Nicolas
On 27/09/2021 09:48, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
> +1
>
> Jacopo
>
> On
I agree with you Jacques.
If some fear are present, as impersonate we can load a specific
permission and add a property that disable by default this function.
Nicolas
On 21/09/2021 08:06, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The security reporter 'thiscodecc" created OFBIZ-
Hello,
I can work this week to control and merge the available patch, and after
we can start the vote.
For other issues, its can wait the next publication.
Nicolas
On 22/09/2021 11:19, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Also for information this is what we get when we include all R18
ocess end
Normally with this you will save your performance and keep your data fresh.
Nicolas
On 17/09/2021 10:10, Werner Brasch wrote:
>
> Hallo
>
>
>
> We are Using the OFBiz-CRM with two instances after a loadbalancer.
>
> So we have to make “cacheClearing” and w
[1]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12321?jql=resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20affectedVersion%20%3D%2018.12.01
:D forgot the link
On 20/09/2021 10:13, Nicolas Malin wrote:
> The main is on the title :)
>
> At this time some issue are always present [1], so we have
The main is on the title :)
At this time some issue are always present [1], so we have to decide
whether to launch and move them to the next.
My feeling is after some time on it, we can go ahead and keep their fix
for the next when it would be possible.
Nicolas
--
logoNrd <https://nereide
On 13/09/2021 16:49, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>
> I think that nobody objects and we can make the new Helveticus theme
> as default theme. Could you please handle it Nicolas ?
ok I will do it :)
Nicolas
With the last commit [1] on the login page, I agree to use Helveticus as
default.
For the reading from right I will happy to improve this theme if some
people want to go on this way. An other word : all contribution are
welcome :D
Nicolas
[1]
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=ofbiz
u test write is terminate to move the groovy-test-suite
to junit-test-suite, so no reason to remove the possibility to write
test as script.
Nicolas
On 08/09/2021 15:30, Gil Portenseigne wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Currently using release 18.12 for some project we got the habit to
> develop u
I reactivate this thread :)
Except if some remarks expressing reticence appears, I propose to
* publish the version 18.12.01 this month
* create the release branch 21.09 with official support of java 11
* migrate the trunk to support for java 17
Suggest ?
On 24/12/2020 06:18, Pranay Pandey wrot
alina: core
* widget: core
* webtools: widget, testtools, datafile, catalina
I know this isn't your final objective but can it be an acceptable spot ?
Nicolas
>
> From the exploratory
> branch https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/pull/319 I
> discovered there are a lo
I will look on it
Nicolas
On 10/08/2021 17:48, build...@apache.org wrote:
> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder ofbizTrunkFrameworkPlugins
> while building ofbiz-framework. Full details are available at:
> https://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbizTrunkFrameworkPlugins/bu
+1
Checksum, test and running ok from debian 10.9 and openjdk version
"1.8.0_292"
Nicolas
On 02/08/2021 11:22, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
> This is the vote thread to release a new bug fix release for the
> release17.12 branch. This new release, "Apache OFBiz 17.12.08&
Hello Eugeu,
Thanks for this discussion,
I'm a little overworked to read and response quietly. I will try to work
on next week, I plead your patience :)
Nicolas
On 02/08/2021 21:45, Eugen Stan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is to start a discussion around how OFBiz is being built an
l quantity of code to
demonstrate an engine on the OFBiz framework instead of
separate it in plugin and load it by apply a path or manually change the
configuration.
Nicolas
On 29/07/2021 10:58, Pierre Smits wrote:
> Hi Ioan,
>
> Would it not be better for the community to be able to impl
Hello,
I opened a jira issue OFBIZ-12292 [1] and a linked Pull Request 318 [2]
for give a good vision of this work.
All remarks are welcome :)
Nicolas
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12292
[2] https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/pull/318
On 12/07/2021 18:20, Nicolas
Yes sur Jacques, we will work on it
Nicolas
On 22/07/2021 14:22, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Thanks Nicolas,
>
> Before making it the default, I suggest few points:
>
> Add themes description:
> https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/commit/0a919960904ffd037508ed05bd4b2bf9c22
Hello,
I just commit some Marine's improvement [1] with your suggests increase
the contrast on blue and add multiple color as rainbowstone.
I think it's a good step to set as default theme :)
Cheers,
Nicolas
[1] https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=ofbiz-framework.git;h=1d2902b
On 20/07/2021 10:06, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> I'd not be against release a last 17.12.08. I think we are not ready
> yet to release 18.12.01?
I think we are ! (Battle start galatica)
Nicolas
>
> Opinions?
>
> Jacques
>
> Le 20/07/2021 à 09:56
st still does not pass in
> R17 there...
>
> In the meantime, I guess simply changing
> xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http:
> to
> xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="https:
>
> In your instances should fix the problem
>
> HTH
>
> Jacques
>
> Le 1
Jacques, I think this problem came from the update label in webtools,
mayby I can check how we update it to force the modification rollback
and escape this case.
Nicolas
On 20/07/2021 08:43, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> TLDR: Long story short the demo are back
>
> I found the reason why R1
Done https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-22126
And I correct a mistake :D It's not since last Jacques's commit but your
last commit Deepak :) (and no problem with that)
Cheers,
Nicolas
On 19/07/2021 21:12, Deepak Dixit wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> It's a good i
[1] https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-site/blob/master/.htaccess
ctrl+enter too speed :D
On 19/07/2021 21:04, Nicolas Malin wrote:
> Hi Deepak,
>
> After a check from my part, I didn't understand why the rewrite rule [1]
> to escape https redirect on dtd, didn't work on ofbiz
Hi Deepak,
After a check from my part, I didn't understand why the rewrite rule [1]
to escape https redirect on dtd, didn't work on ofbiz site after the
last jacques's commit
If you have an idea, else I will open an issue for infra asf team
Nicolas
On 19/07/2021 20:58, Deepak Di
#
We understand that it's hard to read :) you can find the current work on
our labs [3]
Thanks for taking time to read this and any suggests are welcome
Cheers,
Gil, Leila, Nicolas
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11808
[2]
https://lists.apache.org/t
Hello,
I suggest to wait some week, Marine who create this theme is currently
off. I will share your remark upon her return.
Nicolas
On 07/07/2021 07:47, Eugen Stan wrote:
> The new theme looks good, the only thing that bothers me is the light
> blue text on white background - which is no
Thanks Jacques for your look !
On 03/07/2021 19:35, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Oops, actually forgot to pull before testing :/
>
> Fixed now
>
> Le 03/07/2021 à 11:40, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
>> Hi Nicolas,
>>
>> Nevermind, I can't reproduce locally either a
d" service.
Thanks Eugen !
Nicolas
On 04/07/2021 14:59, Eugen Stan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've implemented a clojure engine for OFBiz and I would like to
> contribute this to OFBiz repo.
>
> It was simpler than I thought.
>
> NOTE: Right now the code is b
Non mais sérieux ! Why my local the check is good and not on build bot,
-_-' I know, it hate me ^^
Nicolas
On 02/07/2021 19:04, build...@apache.org wrote:
> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder ofbizTrunkFrameworkPlugins
> while building ofbiz-framework. Full details ar
Hi Michael,
To move forward on the upcoming r18.12 release, I will check some issues
but do we wait the clean or we set a milestone ?
Cheers,
Nicolas
On 11/02/2021 19:05, Michael Brohl wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I did a cleanup of the Jira issues with focus on the upcoming r18.12
Hi Xin,
I took a look and I aggre with you change.
Feel free for each to surcharge the value on custom plugins.
Cheers,
Nicolas
On 15/06/2021 16:53, Xin Wang wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Currently, session timeout is configured in apps separately, in their per-app
> web.xml. But as we s
:) thanks for the look
Nicolas
On 25/05/2021 12:42, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Actually I'm working on
> https://github.com/checkstyle/checkstyle/issues/10012
>
> I did not pull. It's now fixed.
>
> Le 25/05/2021 à 11:33, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
>> Hi Nicol
Hi Jacques,
It's strange, I haven't this issue on my local
Nicolas
On 22/05/2021 16:53, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> There is a checkstyle issue in this commit. It's not a big deal in
> itself but it might hide some other issues coming from now
>
Thanks both for your return,
We will create a new theme for this.
Nicolas
On 16/05/2021 00:29, Michael Brohl wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> great work, thanks for sharing!
>
> I'd vote for a new theme in case of users relying on the rainbowstone
> theme as it is now.
>
>
1 - 100 of 2169 matches
Mail list logo
