Re: [PROPOSAL] freeze trunk for new features in favor of a release 24.x branch preparation / future roadmap

+1 Thanks, Gil On 03/09/2024 15:21, Nicolas Malin wrote: > Hello, > > After going through this thread [1], I propose to go ahead with the > creation of the `release24` branch in a few weeks, and the release of > the next official version 2 or 3 weeks later. > > Why: >  

Re: [VOTE] Apache OFBiz 18.12.10

+1 Thanks, Gil On 27/11/2023 11:48, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: This is the vote thread to publish "Apache OFBiz 18.12.10", tenth release from the release18.12 branch. The release files can be downloaded from here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ofbiz/ and are: * apache-ofbi

IDEA plugin contribution

https://github.com/Nereide-lab/idea-ofbiz-plugin/tree/apache-standardisation If the idea pleases the community, i will be happy to set up the new repository and procedure for plugin release and so on. I will just need some guidance on the best way to do it. Thanks and regards, Gil

Re: OFBiz 22.01 - Eclipse - Issues on setting up a debugging environment.

building one for this particular effort, if that could bring more confidence in migration. Regards, Gil [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/03fr40tvhkv97pqrgt4nl78w4m6ml33w On 2023/05/02 07:16:35 Daniel Watford wrote: > Hi Michael, > > I would be concerned about our capacity to move

Re: OFBiz 22.01 - Eclipse - Issues on setting up a debugging environment.

+1 Thanks, Gil Le 03/05/2023 à 16:39, Michael Brohl a écrit : +1 from my side. Best regards, Michael Am 03.05.23 um 09:45 schrieb Jacopo Cappellato: On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 9:17 AM Daniel Watford wrote: [...] I'll ask one more question (and then run for cover!): Rather than carr

Re: [OFBIZ-12801] "Error at CommunicationEventServices.groovy:489"

::success ? Gil Le 26/04/2023 à 09:49, Gil Portenseigne a écrit : Hello, I like the idea that the developer do not have to sync about which method to use. If I understand well what Michael envision, i.e. to use for event a new GroovyBaseEvent class, and for services/scripts a GroovyBaseScript

Re: [jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-12808) Eclipse build problems and proper dependency setup

+1 Gil Le 26/04/2023 à 16:36, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : +1 Jacques Le 26/04/2023 à 16:01, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : +1 Jacopo On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 3:11 PM Michael Brohl wrote: Hi everyone, any objections against merging those pr's for framework/plugins in trunk/release22.0

Re: [OFBIZ-12801] "Error at CommunicationEventServices.groovy:489"

, should be one way to allow this usage. But I don't know about IDE integration behavior of such a solution... Do you think that is worth a look ? I will just add that there is a chance that project implementation are using groovy script as the event target (I know some ;) ) Thanks, Gil

Re: Codenarc integration process

me to fix that, i wanted to ask if it is allowed ? Gil Le 27/03/2023 à 16:46, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Hi Guys, For those who have used a non "PASSED" lozenge in wiki and resolved a related conversation in GH please update the status in wiki TIA Jacques Le 28/01/2023 à 11:51, Gil

Re: [VOTE] Apache OFBiz 18.12.07

+1 Everything is fine from my side ! Thanks Gil Le 03/04/2023 à 09:47, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : This is the vote thread to publish "Apache OFBiz 18.12.07", seventh and probably final release from the release18.12 branch. The release files can be downloaded from h

Re: Codenarc integration process

Oh sorry indeed i overview the review approach section. The table is nice, thanks Dan ! 28 janv. 2023 09:37:50 Daniel Watford : > Hi Gil, > > I don't think a checklist is quite enough, assuming we want to track the > status of each file reviewed. > > From the

Re: Codenarc integration process

Haha, i understand, I will continue reviewing and testing while others can review also, Thanks Jacques 21 janv. 2023 10:43:08 Jacques Le Roux : > Thanks Gil, > > OK, seems good to me to avoid gstring indeed. > > I had a glance, I was too optimistic. I'll not review

Re: Codenarc integration process

GString objects created with double quotes. Creating normal String objects with double quotes is confusing to readers. Gil 21 janv. 2023 09:41:39 Jacques Le Roux : > Hi Gil, > > So we need to use single quotes instead of double quotes now in Groovy? > > Thanks > > Jacques

Re: Welcome to Leila Mekika as new committer

Congratulations Leila ! Bravo ! Gil On 04/10/2022 09:30, MLeila wrote: Hello all, Thanks for your welcome! I am glad to join the team and be able to contribute more actively on the project Regards, Leila Le 04/10/2022 à 07:38, Devanshu Vyas a écrit : Many congratulations and welcome

Re: Codenarc integration, rules to use.

Hello Jacques, Thanks for your feedback, I'll go with that. Gil On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 10:08:20AM +0200, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Hi Gil, > > Here are my preferences inline... > > Le 20/07/2022 à 23:49, Gil Portenseigne a écrit : > > Thanks All for the feedback.

Re: Codenarc integration, rules to use.

me as UnnecessaryGetter Thanks, Gil On 2022/07/04 15:24:43 Gil Portenseigne wrote: > Hello Devs, > > I would like to continue Codenarc integration in OFBiz (OFBIZ-11167). > > For those who are not aware, Codenarc is an analysis tools for Groovy > for defects, bad practices, incons

Re: Codenarc integration, rules to use.

Hello Michael, Sure, you can see in the pull request I started to separate the commit, a commit for one rule fix. The last one is a big one :) https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/pull/517/commits/384894dfafce5e7261e2564b40261650deda7a22 Regards, Gil Le Dimanche, Juillet 10, 2022 16

Re: Codenarc integration, rules to use.

Forgot the ref https://github.com/CodeNarc/CodeNarc/issues/331 Le 12 juillet 2022 21:11:13 GMT+02:00, Gil Portenseigne a écrit : >Hello, > >I agree with you, i find out here [1] that it is customisable. > >So we can agree upon this variation of the rule ! > >I have not te

Re: Codenarc integration, rules to use.

Hello, I agree with you, i find out here [1] that it is customisable. So we can agree upon this variation of the rule ! I have not tested yet, will see in the near future Thanks Gil Le 11 juillet 2022 17:57:45 GMT+02:00, Scott Gray a écrit : >+1 in general from me although some of th

Codenarc integration, rules to use.

an opposition about applying one of the above rule, i would be great to express it and discuss it here. My opinion is that it could be nice to adopt every rules, to respect standard best practice. Even if it implies lot of code changes. Thanks in advance for your feedback. Regards, Gil signa

Re: "New commiter first steps" wiki page proposal

Hello Giulio, I just went through the page, it's nice and clear ! Thanks Gil Le samedi 14 mai 2022 à 16:32 +0200, Giulio Speri - MpStyle Srl a écrit : > Hello Devs, > > I hope you are all doing well! > I finally had some time to write a little guide regarding the steps &g

Re: [INFRA-22722] Restart the ofbiz-vm3 demos server

I do not remember doing such :) Gil On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 07:13:02PM +0100, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Ah forgot, did you fix the warnings? > > Le 23/03/2022 à 19:09, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : > > Great, thanks Gil! > > > > Le 23/03/2022 à 18:15, Gil Portenseigne a

Re: [INFRA-22722] Restart the ofbiz-vm3 demos server

Hello Jacques, We have some production server based on 18.12, with java 11. It is working fine. Gil On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 05:58:25PM +0100, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > BTW, > > Is there someone who is already using Java 11 with 18.12? > > TIA > > Jacques > > Le

Re: Welcome to Nicola Mazzoni and Giulio Speri as new committers

Congratulations, Welcome ! Gil On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 09:26:16PM +0100, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > The OFBiz PMC has invited Nicola Mazzoni and Giulio Speri as new > committers and we are glad to announce that they have accepted the > nomination. > > On behalf of the OFBiz PMC, w

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 18.12.05 (second attempt)

-ofbiz-18.12.05.zip: F7952ED5 C794357F E730C7DE 404B0B8B 7A123A89 9DA7A1C1 4D0136ED 64D6FAA3 7645018E 9EDE93FB 88FC27A3 D718DA64 E8636541 334583ED 606F5516 6D653B2C sha checksum OK PGP sigs and integration test ok. Thanks, Gil On Sun, Jan 02, 2022 at 12:29:37PM +0100, Jacopo Cappellato wrote

Re: [Conclusion] PartyRole usage in OFBiz

Hello Pierre, Inline, On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 06:48:40PM +0100, Pierre Smits wrote: > Hi Gil, All, > > My apologies, but I have to object to this and for the following reasoning: > Objections to pursuing improvements to the entity definition (for > PartyRole) and subsequent addre

[Conclusion] PartyRole usage in OFBiz

an be lead into separate thread if needed, to let anyone envision it without being polluted by the previous discussion in the thread. If no one object I will close Jira about PartyRole lifespan. Thanks for your sharing, and Regards. Gil signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [VOTE] Apache OFBiz 18.12.02 (second attempt)

+1 Thanks On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 05:26:52PM +0100, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > This is the second vote thread to publish "Apache OFBiz 18.12.02", the > second release from the release18.12 branch. > > The release files can be downloaded from here: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ofbiz/

Re: PartyRole usage in OFBiz

l that the goal of OFBIZ-5827. I hope it is clear Gil Le lun. 15 nov. 2021 à 1:25 pm, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Hi Gil, Inline... Le 15/11/2021 à 10:36, gil a écrit : Hello, The current applications IMO are not meant to be used as it, but are presenting existing features. So there are m

RE: Welcome Wiebke Pätzold as new committer!

Congratulations Wiebke ! Regards, Gil Le lun. 15 nov. 2021 à 2:09 pm, Swapnil Shah a écrit : Many congratulations and welcome aboard Weibke !! Regards, Swapnil -Original Message- From: Jacques Le Roux <mailto:jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com>> Sent: 29 October 2021 20:1

Re: PartyRole usage in OFBiz

Integrators to decide and customize application to use `ensurePartRole` when it is needed, or to lookup for the good configured party the way it is the best for our case. In other word, Jacques I second your proposal, that seems the consensus we could agree on. Thanks, Gil Le lun. 15 nov. 2021 à

PartyRole usage in OFBiz

y key (fromDate) The fact is that a such big subject need to be addressed with the community consensus, as it is not trivial. Please let us know you thoughts about this task and let's decide, if we need to organize or if we need to close pending Jira with reference to this discussion ? Thanks, Gil

Re: [VOTE] Apache OFBiz 18.12.01

+1 Thanks, Gil On Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 05:08:32PM +0200, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > This is the vote thread to publish "Apache OFBiz 18.12.01", the first > release from the release17.12 branch. > > The release files can be downloaded from here: > https://dist.apache

Re: [apache/ofbiz-framework] Run failed: Java CI with Gradle - trunk (c0f8783)

Hello, I got a notification of CI that use jdk 1.8 for trunk. Is there any action that i can do to configure java 11 or more ? Thanks, Gil On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 06:03:33AM -0700, Gil Portenseigne wrote: > [apache/ofbiz-framework] Java CI with Gradle workflow run > > Repositor

Re: [DISCUSSION] Do we start the R18 publish process ?

+1 Thanks, Gil On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 10:13:04AM +0200, Nicolas Malin wrote: > The main is on the title :) > > At this time some issue are always present [1], so we have to decide > whether to launch and move them to the next. > > My feeling is after some time on it, we can

Re: Freemarker auto-escaping

Hello, I used to define `<#ftl output_format="XML">` on top of ftl files for this purpose. But having this on file extension looks nice to me. Thanks Jacques for the head up. Gil On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 02:59:27PM +0200, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Hi, > >

Groovy integration tests

process, not having to restart OFBiz is nice. So if nobody is against, I will reintroduce it in trunk with a note explaining the `dev` usage. WDYT Regards, Gil [1] https://localhost:8443/webtools/control/TestSuiteInfo [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11165 signature.asc

Re: Logical dependency tree for ofbiz components OFBIZ-12309

nition * testtools: integration test engine * catalina: container for embedded tomcat * widget: screen rendering based on xml definition * webtools: web interface to analyse and manage different OFBiz engines Thanks Eugen, Nicolas and Gil signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Next rather than old demo

Hello Jacques, I agree it's better to show the present and future. Thanks, Gil On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 11:47:18AM +0300, Eugen Stan wrote: > On 03.09.2021 20:00, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > > Hi, > > > > We have an old demo. It's the previous stable. I think we sh

Re: [VOTE] Apache OFBiz 17.12.08

+1 Checksum, signature and tests are OK Thanks, Gil On Mon, Aug 02, 2021 at 12:24:13PM +0200, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > +1 > > Back and front ends OK > > Checksums OK > > $ ./verify-ofbiz-release.sh apache-ofbiz-17.12.08.zip > sha check of file: apache-ofbiz-17.12

Re: I'm working on an OFBiz helm chart for kubernetes

configuration process. Regards, Gil [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9498 On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 10:57:22AM +0200, Pierre Smits wrote: > Hi Ioan, > > My apologies for the late reaction. > > IMO we can forget about the Derby route for this. Derby is not producti

Re: Introduce a "Good First Issue" Jira Label

Hello, Good idea, To add some more about GoodForNewContributors, it seems well used in GitLab platform : https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/issues?label_name%5B%5D=good+for+new+contributors So sticking with it seems nice to me. Thanks Le 07/05/2021 à 15:53, Aditya Sharma a écrit : Hi

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 17.12.07

Hello, +1 Tests are OK, basic usage OK, SHA and signature OK Regards, Gil Le 13/04/2021 à 10:39, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : This is the vote thread to release a new bug fix release for the release17.12 branch. This new release, "Apache OFBiz 17.12.07" will supersede all th

Re: Releasing 17.12.05, 18.12.01 and freezing R20

+1 for Michael ! Cheers On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 02:57:25PM +0100, Michael Brohl wrote: > +1 for the initial proposal > > with an additional idea: maybe better skip r20 and make a r21 right at the > beginning of the year with the chance to release also in 21. > > This would allow us to catch up

Chapter 3 : promoting decorator

Hello devs, This mail introduce the last Chapter of our story that describe in which context we created some new decorators. First, we want to recall the common-theme effort objectives : The common-theme component is the default theme that define every screens that are available for theme surcha

Re: Chapter two: Rules to dynamize screen

Hello James, No worry i wasn't active due to the situation we are aware of... I plan to get back into the subject in the coming weeks. Regards, Gil On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 04:08:07PM -, James Yong wrote: > Hi Gil, > > Sorry for the late reply. > I agree that button

Re: Adopting Github Workflow

Hi, On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 05:08:47PM +0100, Michael Brohl wrote: > > > > - Adopt Github Pull Request (PR) as the unique channel for code contribution > > -1 > > I don't see a reason why we should not allow patches also. It will make it > easier for people to contribute who are not able (or wi

Re: Git history problem

+1 IMO i prefer to rebase and check the commit i push in my local repo. Thanks Le 11 mars 2020 16:52:36 GMT+01:00, Mathieu Lirzin a écrit : >>> The simple solution to prevent this is to get into the habit of >>> linearizing history, meaning always rebasing and clean history >before >>> mergin

Groovy Migration : createRequirementFromItemATP

ecated it in next release (18.12) and remove it in trunk ? WDYT ? Regards, Gil signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: buildbot failure in on ofbizTrunkFramework

I introduced a test error with my new test, i'll look into it. Gil On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 03:48:10PM +, build...@apache.org wrote: > The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder ofbizTrunkFramework while > building ofbiz-framework. Full details are available at:

Re: Important Notice on Mailbox Account upgrade for notificati...@ofbiz.apache.org

Nope, same here. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 17.12.01 (full version), vote #3

+1 On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 06:09:34PM +0100, Michael Brohl wrote: > +1 > > ~/Projects/apache-ofbiz/dist-apache-ofbiz-17.12.01  > ../ofbiz-tools/verify-ofbiz-release.sh apache-ofbiz-17.12.01.zip > sha check of file: apache-ofbiz-17.12.01.zip > Using sha file: apache-ofbiz-17.12.01.zip.sha512 > ap

Re: Impersonation feature, was: Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 17.12.01 (full version), vote #3

regarding the concern that were expressed. And i'm glad that was done this way (improvement through discussion). Gil On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 09:01:30AM +0100, Michael Brohl wrote: > *creating a new thread to leave the vote thread untouched* > > > In my understanding from the previ

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 17.12.01 (full version), vote #3

security list. I'm open to discuss about the "criminal" aspect of the impersonation feature, but not on this thread. Gil On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 02:54:01AM +0100, Pierre Smits wrote: > -1 > > As this release contains software elements that will enable criminal > pa

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 17.12.01 (full version), vote #2

A bit late but +1 ! Thanks On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 09:24:02AM +0100, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > This is the vote thread (2nd attempt) to release "Apache OFBiz 17.12.01": > this is the first release, containing the framework, applications and all > the plugins from the 17.12 release branches. > >

Re: PMC/Committer resignation

I second Nicolas opinion. I hope that we will evolve and that will allow you to come back in the community in the future. Let me thank you again for your time and kind help. Gil On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 02:51:28PM +0100, Nicolas Malin wrote: > It's sad new that you sharing. > >

Re: checkstyle improvements

Inline, > > I'm kinda prefer the "opposite approach", but we need to discuss if this > > improvement is worth the history lost. > > > > In the example you chose, i see no issue capitalizing module, > > resource and other. Updating the rule offer the ability to write a > > constant like : MoDuLe

Re: checkstyle improvements

f* Apache OFBiz > <https://ofbiz.apache.org/>, since 2008 > > *Apache Trafodion <https://trafodion.apache.org>, Vice President* > *Apache Directory <https://directory.apache.org>, PMC Member* > Apache Incubator <https://incubator.apache.org>, committer

Re: checkstyle improvements

ou for starting this discussion. Regards, Gil On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 05:44:40PM +0100, Michael Brohl wrote: > Hi *, > > checkstyle currently reports a huge amount of errors. We currently have an > error count setup in the configuration to prevent the build from failing > because of the

Re: buildbot failure in on ofbizTrunkFrameworkPlugins

It's an error while cherry picking the bugFix from trunk. I will revert. On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 12:10:46PM +0100, Gil Portenseigne wrote: > Yes, i'm on it... > On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 11:56:14AM +0100, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > > It's OK, but we have now a com

Re: buildbot failure in on ofbizTrunkFrameworkPlugins

Yes, i'm on it... On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 11:56:14AM +0100, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > It's OK, but we have now a compilation in R17: > https://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbizBranch17Framework > > Please Gil have a look > > Thanks > > Le 12/02/2020 à 09:00, Jacque

Re: In preparation for the first release from 17.12

Yes, it is a good way to go. Thanks Jacopo On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 03:38:46PM +0100, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > So far it seems that we are in favor of releasing the full version > (framework + plugins) named "Apache OFBiz 17.12.01" and then also the > version without the plugins. > If this is th

Re: In preparation for the first release from 17.12

+1 Regards, Gil On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 05:02:18PM +0100, Nicolas Malin wrote: > Hi, > > I most in favor to propose two products like : > >     "Apache OFBiz Framework 17.12.01" (framework) > and >     "Apache OFBiz Full 17.12.01" (framework + plugin

Re: svn commit: r1828233 - /ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/applications/accounting/src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/accounting/finaccount/FinAccountServices.java

+1 for the fix. On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 12:22:48PM +0100, Michael Brohl wrote: > During a migration I found that this bugfix was not backported to the 17.12 > release branch. > > Should I do it now? > > Regards, > > Michael Brohl > > ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de > > > Am 03.04.18 um 15:06 s

Re: Github & notifications

+1 If we do not decide of replacing Jira with Github or another BT, we must keep Jira for contribution tracking. There might be a jira integration in github for that ? Gil On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 12:16:11PM +0100, Michael Brohl wrote: > I'm automatically informed about the pull req

Re: [PROPOSAL] Environment variable configuration

variable), and others contributors feedback, we might elaborate the best to ease configuration management. Thanks and Regards. Gil On Sun, Feb 02, 2020 at 04:40:14PM +0100, Michael Brohl wrote: > Hi everyone, > > the recent discussions reminded me of this thread again. There were a few >

Re: Removing “base/config/component-load.xml”

people to intervene. Thanks and best regards. Gil On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 04:47:41PM +0100, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > This is exactly the reason why I would prefer to start a new. Things get > confusing. > > I'd finally prefer a new clean thread with the pro and cons for eve

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 16.11.07

+1 Thanks On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 12:16:54AM +0530, Deepak Dixit wrote: > +1 > > Thanks & Regards > -- > Deepak Dixit > ofbiz.apache.org > > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 9:56 PM Nicolas Malin > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Same result from my local > > > > Nicolas > > > > On 30/01/2020 16:06, Michae

Re: [DISCUSSION] R16 and R17: email password issue and releases

I wonder if it is bad for the project to have 2 years between two releases, 16 => 18 => 20 WDYT ? Gil On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 05:31:14PM +0100, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Le 24/01/2020 à 15:09, Nicolas Malin a écrit : > > On 24/01/2020 14:57, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > >

Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.

+1 On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 11:27:15AM +0100, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Hi, > > R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of support. We > can soon expect a last release but we need to think about the next to be > released package > > Some would prefer to release R17 before rel

Chapter two: Rules to dynamize screen

formation from the main object that is processed. But we will discuss this in another mail Chapter 3 : promoting decorator usage Best Regards, Leila, Nicolas and Gil signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [DISCUSSION] Make Back-Office screens dynamic

Hello James, Thanks for the reference we will look into that. Regards, On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 03:50:23PM -, James Yong wrote: > Hi Gil, > > I wonder if this library helps for a start: > https://github.com/joshualjohnson/jquery.x > > Regards, > James > signat

Re: [DISCUSSION] Make Back-Office screens dynamic

Thanks Gavin for sharing, i have a clearer view now :). Le 17:05 - mardi 17 déc., Gavin Mabie a écrit : > Hi Gil > > I used a type=groovy service to resolve the form location eg. > /* > *@paramater formLocaction (where the form resides in the system) > *@parameter formName

Re: [DISCUSSION] Make Back-Office screens dynamic

Hello Gavin, Thanks for four feedback, that's very interesting ! Could you elaborate about the OFBiz forms usage you did in your angular implementation ? You just used view-map with simple screen/form ? Cheers ! Gil Le 12:26 - mardi 17 déc., Gavin Mabie a écrit : > Hi Taher >

Re: [DISCUSSION] Make Back-Office screens dynamic

new tag that should have been named "callback-update-area", would complete the already existing " Hello Gil, > > Great research on the subject, thank you for sharing. > > I could be wrong here, but at a first glance it seems you want to > essentially create a tag &qu

[DISCUSSION] Make Back-Office screens dynamic

Chapter One: How to manage the updating area Hello, After different discussions already listed by Taher [1-9], Leila, Nicolas and me tried another approach. Instead of analyzing how to implement different functionalities offered by modern js framework, we did analyzed how end user use, in general

Re: Github PRs and Jira

tlab reference like the nereide public gitlab project we already shared (one or two time) in the past :). Gil

Re: Github PRs and Jira

pull request, if not, it's always ok to have and attached patch or other gitlab reference. Gil Le 11:55 - mardi 03 déc., Jacques Le Roux a écrit : > Le 03/12/2019 à 08:21, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : > > Now that we have migrated to Git, in my opinion we should really consider > &

Audit max-retry failure async job

the event could be ‘async-last-failure’, to trigger another service which role can be to alert/log/replay... I did not yet analyse if this is easily feasible. Any ideas ? Best Regards Gil

Re: Change commit message template?

Hello, When we first decided on the current template, i did understood that jira number was at the end of the first line, that was logical in my view. I was mistaken and did not discussed it by then. Setting Jira number at the end of the first line is fine for me. Gil Le 21:16 - dimanche 17

Re: [ofbiz-framework] 02/02: Fixed: Update the SvnCheckout Gradle task to used Github svn repo (OFBIZ-11276)

Thanks Jacques, i understood it was temporary and tested it, i was just curious :) It is strange to see a git url in svnCheckout utility. Gil Le 10:47 - vendredi 08 nov., Jacques Le Roux a écrit : > Hi Gil, > > Yes sure, here it is https://s.apache.org/lwptd > > I said i

Re: [ofbiz-framework] 02/02: Fixed: Update the SvnCheckout Gradle task to used Github svn repo (OFBIZ-11276)

Hello Jacques, Could you provide a reference to the github feature you mentionned ? Thanks Gil Le 19:02 - mercredi 06 nov., jler...@apache.org a écrit : > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. > > jleroux pushed a commit to branch trunk > in repo

Re: Git repo for each ofbiz plugin

gards, Gil [1] https://git-scm.com/docs/git-submodule Le 16:20 - jeudi 07 nov., Deepak Dixit a écrit : > Agree we may some issues, we need to find out and fix if found. > > As per current git repo, How user can only checkout and use ecommerce or bi > or any single component? >

Re: Upgrading Groovy 2.4.16 → 2.5.8

Hello Mathieu, I've test the upgrade and saw no issue, so +1. Gil Le 18:19 - dimanche 27 oct., Mathieu Lirzin a écrit : > Hello, > > I have open OFBIZ-11263 [1] to upgrade Groovy to its latest stable > release on ‘trunk’. > > I did not detect any issue with the

Re: [DISCUSSION] R16 and R17: email password issue and releases

Hello, I think that the one year stabilisation period needed for a new branch to be released is not that far for R18 (less than two month), so I suppose that skipping R17 to avoid maintaining two release branches is a good call. Gil Le 13:29 - samedi 28 sept., Jacques Le Roux a écrit : >

Refactoring ServiceSemaphore (OFBIZ-11204)

nt. Since semaphore feature is a quite critical one, some reviews would be appreciated before commiting it in the codebase. Regards, Gil

Re: Avoiding to log Uel stacktraces (was: svn commit: r1867635 - /ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/framework/base/src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/base/util/string/UelFunctions.java)

Hello Mathieu ! Done, thanks for your review, i hope it is more clear. Gil Le 16:23 - vendredi 27 sept., Mathieu Lirzin a écrit : > Hello Gil, > > p...@apache.org writes: > > > Author: pgil > > Date: Fri Sep 27 13:52:43 2019 > > New Revision: 1867635 > > &

Re: Default transaction timeout on screen widget

Same feeling here, i just see it as a smell to analyse, to detect bad design, system failure (disk access...) or regression. Regards Gil Le 20:45 - mardi 17 sept., Scott Gray a écrit : > Has anyone ever had a good experience with transaction timeouts? I feel > like they achieve nothing

Re: [DISCUSSION] Best of both Groovy worlds: compile and on the fly

Hello Jacques, I also discussed about it with Mathieu and i find it very interesting. The main advantage I see is, beside compilation, the integration in your IDE, that was not optimum, and the possibility to re-use methods from these script migrated to explicit classes. So +1 Gil Le 12:28

Re: svn commit: r1858243 - in /ofbiz/ofbiz-plugins/trunk: ecommerce/minilang/customer/CustomerEvents.xml example/template/reports/BarCode.fo.ftl

Hello Suraj, You commited something about maritalStatus id this commit. I guess its part of another JIRA. Regards Le 06:18 - samedi 27 avril, sur...@apache.org a écrit : > Author: surajk > Date: Sat Apr 27 06:18:17 2019 > New Revision: 1858243 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1858243&v

Re: [PROPOSAL] DataModel - Improve Internal Fields injection

A big post for saying that the feature i just wanted to recall about do not fit your need :). I used it in the past for a critical audit, and was happy with it. Le 14:23 - vendredi 26 avril, Pierre Smits a écrit : > Gill, all, > > The entity_audit_log feature also sprung into my mind shortly af

Re: [PROPOSAL] DataModel - Improve Internal Fields injection

users. If you find out that specific entity miss those fields, it can be added case by case. But i do not feel ok into a global feature. Regards Gil Le 11:17 - vendredi 26 avril, Pierre Smits a écrit : > The two fields are extremely useful (even indispensable) regarding auditing > an

Re: Send E-Mails

What I understand is that to keep granted right after the migration if our confluence id is différent from our apache id, we must fill in a INFRA Jira to make the switch ? Le 09:23 - mardi 26 mars, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : > Makes sense Pierre, > > Please Gil checks https://issues.a

Re: Send E-Mails

Thanks Jacques :) Le 09:21 - mardi 26 mars, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : > Hi Gil, > > Let me check > > Jacques > > Le 26/03/2019 à 08:56, Gil Portenseigne a écrit : > > Hello there, > > > > Do somes actions have been taken on documenting the existence

Re: Send E-Mails

... can someone grant me access ? Thanks Gil Le 12:50 - vendredi 11 mai, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit : > Actually, I think whatever need to be documented is best placed in our > embedded documentation. We should probably consider freezing all new > documentation in any place that is not the

Re: Welcome to Mathieu Lirzin as new committer!

Welcome Mathieu, and Congratulations ! Gil Le 20:15 - mardi 19 févr., Taher Alkhateeb a écrit : > The OFBiz PMC has invited Mathieu Lirzin to become a new committer and > we are happy to announce that he has accepted this role. > > Some of the reasons for inviting Mathieu include:

Re: buildbot failure in on ofbizTrunkFrameworkPlugins

Hello, I just checked again with ‘./gradlew cleanAll loadAll testIntegration’, A got build successful... no failure. Gil Le 20:11 - vendredi 28 déc., Jacques Le Roux a écrit : > Hi Gil, > > Are we sure there is not a test issue with this commit? > > Locally I can't repr

OFBIZ-10691 Refactoring ‘EntityCondition’

will commit it next week. Also Mathieu ask to not squash the patches within the Jira, and i'm particularly in favor of it, since it is not the custom to do it in OFBiz, i wanted to make it clear :). Regards, Gil

Re: [DISCUSSION] Checking debug levels in Java and Groovy files

Hello, The difference with the documentation and Mathieu's example is the presence of String concatenation. Here lies the performance improvment. If there a simple String is used, the if is uneeded :) Regards Gil Le 19:58 - mardi 11 déc., Taher Alkhateeb a écrit : > The official docum

Re: svn commit: r1845086 [2/2] - in /ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/applications: accounting/webapp/accounting/WEB-INF/ content/webapp/content/WEB-INF/ order/webapp/ordermgr/WEB-INF/ party/webapp/partymg

Hello Suraj, Is there a reason to keep empty path for service event ? Regards Gil Le lundi 29 oct. 2018 à 08:14:55 (-), sur...@apache.org a écrit : > Modified: > ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/applications/workeffort/webapp/workeffort/WEB-INF/controller.xml > URL: > http://sv

  1   2   3   4   5   >