@jacopo: That sounds like a terrific idea of yours! I have to read up on
[Proposal], but from your outline here, i would say it is a more sincere
step.
@Olivier: I liked your presenation on addon-manager a lot and as already
discussed would think that a tool like this (sort of like a yum- install
I am concerned about this move to be honest. In general, the idea to focus
with apache ofbiz on its core and to cluster the other components into
external "plugins" is an important step, however, I do not think that moving
it all outside of ASF would help us by any means.
In my opinion it is impo
Perhaps to clarify: The feature is most useful when used in combination with
other Servlets or Filters that work next to ControlServlet. A common
scenario could be an intercepting CMS that is supposed to handle page
requests up front. If no page is found it is sometimes wanted to fallback to
the of
http://www.nabble.com/file/p23382931/build.xml build.xml
Please do me a favor and replace the included build.xml file located in
/webservices/orca with the one attached. I removed the last few references
to our own classes and replaced them with the sample WeatherServices one.
The WeatherServi
David E Jones-3 wrote:
>
> It sounds like that stuff needs a LOT of cleaning up before it goes
> into the trunk...
>
It looks like there was still some reference to my old Java class (I
expected that to happen), but shouldn't be a problem for me to fix and
re-upload (I will do that later to
Hey everyone,
say is there any implementation of SFTP instead of FTP available? (I didn't
feel like opening up a new thread for this simple topic)
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/A-tiny-update-in-ftpservices-tp22701814p22756868.html
Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list
Hey,
I would argue for the following slight modifications in FtpServices.java and
Framework/Common/servicedef/services.xml:
Services.xml:
Replace:
with
Hey everyone,
while taking a closer look at the fieldtypemysql.xml file i noticed that we
are using predominantly varchars, which got me thinking. I know out of my
own experience (and from several authors), that the use of dynamic datatypes
results in increased query times. A well formatted datab
I tried to commit this to the project, but I guess that I don't have the
correct rights to do this, so I guess I am going to do it right here
instead.
I personally think, that we shouldn't list any task/phase per se, but limit
it to the once that are not cancelled. Internally we got the problem,
I can only agree with Jacques on this one. To be honest, I didn't think about
the reusability of categories in applications, which is why a tree structure
doesn't make any sense - absolutely correct. I guess the only way of
implementing anything of that sort would be by opening up a 1:n relational
Hey everybody,
I just wanted to get a discussion going on nested sets. In the past few
weeks, I had to work alot with the ofbiz category structure and I really got
the feeling that the way the productcategories are setup, it takes an awful
lot of time to run through the categories, slowly queryin
BJ Freeman wrote:
>
> You have stated what caused the responses, when you made assumptions.
> [I have worked with Solr, not lucene.]
>
> You have not investigated how ofbiz works.
I think that comments like that are not only unneccesary, but unhealthy for
any open discussion. (Please read my o
Not to sound rude, but frankly I am already getting sick of all of these
false accusations. All I wanted to know was whether or not anybody ever
tried to switch search engines. I was in the understanding that for the
product searches, OFBiz was using Lucene (and yes, I was fully aware that
Solr i
what I found in
org.ofbiz.content.search.SearchServices).
So in order to use a different Searchengine, I would have to write my own
XML-File generator and feed the search engine with that, correct? Doesn't
the entityengine already do that with such data?
Adam Heath-2 wrote:
>
> madppiper wrote:
>> A
or in other words, how is
> solr less proprietary than Lucene? Sorry, that commented just sounded
> really funny.
>
> -David
>
>
> On Sep 10, 2008, at 6:46 AM, madppiper wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was curious whether it would be possible to re
Hi,
I was curious whether it would be possible to replace the proprietary Lucene
engine with solr ( http://apache.org/solr www.apache.org/solr ). The
question I am asking is because that could increase the overall performance
and also allow the fancy facetting.
So in case it is possible (it sho
wrote:
>
> Correct it's defined in the main Store screen, but *please* use rather
> user ML for such questions :
> http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBADMIN/Mailing+Lists#MailingLists-DeveloperList:dev@ofbiz.apache.org
>
> Thanks
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "m
Hi there,
it's me again. I think I am slowly getting the hang out of this enormous
application. However, right now I am stuck applying a common stylesheet to
my new hot-deploy-application. I couldn't find an article describing the
correct way of applying one, so I figured I may as well ask:
If I
I just skipped through the Database and noticed how it bursts with Varchar,
Longtext and Decimal Datatypes. With increasing Datasets that should result
in slower query-results and hence use up some of the needed CPU-Performance.
(The reason for that is similar to the following:
If you think of t
19 matches
Mail list logo
