ion required in Add Billing Accounts Role
>
>
> Key: OFBIZ-7429
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7429
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Sub-task
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7429?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pranay Pandey updated OFBIZ-7429:
-
Sprint: Community Day 2 - 2016
> Client side validation required in Add Billing Accounts R
billing
accounting roles.
> Client side validation required in Add Billing Accounts Role
>
>
> Key: OFBIZ-7429
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7429
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7429?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ankit Joshi updated OFBIZ-7429:
---
Assignee: (was: Ankit Joshi)
> Client side validation required in Add Billing Accounts R
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7429?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ankit Joshi reassigned OFBIZ-7429:
--
Assignee: Ankit Joshi
> Client side validation required in Add Billing Accounts R
Padmavati Rawat created OFBIZ-7429:
--
Summary: Client side validation required in Add Billing Accounts
Role
Key: OFBIZ-7429
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7429
Project: OFBiz
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sharan Foga updated OFBIZ-1243:
---
Flagged: (was: Impediment)
> Billing Accounts: wrong balance if payments are applied using
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sharan Foga updated OFBIZ-1243:
---
Flagged: Impediment
> Billing Accounts: wrong balance if payments are applied using the standard
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sharan Foga updated OFBIZ-1243:
---
Sprint: Bug Crush Event - 21/2/2015
> Billing Accounts: wrong balance if payments are applied us
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato reassigned OFBIZ-1243:
Assignee: (was: Jacopo Cappellato)
> Billing Accounts: wrong balance
oldest Invoice(s).
Skip
-Original Message-
From: David E Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2007 2:03 PM
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: Billing Accounts
A Payment applied to a BillingAccount does not mean the payment is
closed, in fact I'm not even
(s).
Skip
-Original Message-
From: David E Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2007 2:03 PM
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: Billing Accounts
A Payment applied to a BillingAccount does not mean the payment is
closed, in fact I'm not even sure what it me
007 11:45 PM
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: Billing Accounts
Skip,
I very well remember that valuable message from David: it helped me a
lot when I've recently refactored the billing accounts.
Where is the current implementation not following David's notes?
Thanks,
Jacopo
[EMAIL
e: Billing Accounts
Skip,
I very well remember that valuable message from David: it helped me a
lot when I've recently refactored the billing accounts.
Where is the current implementation not following David's notes?
Thanks,
Jacopo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I just ran across this
Skip,
I very well remember that valuable message from David: it helped me a
lot when I've recently refactored the billing accounts.
Where is the current implementation not following David's notes?
Thanks,
Jacopo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just ran across this in the Wiki
s in the Wiki from David concerning Billing Accounts
> from back in July.
>
> http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBIZ/Billing+Account
>
> The current Ofbiz implementation does not operate as described in this
> document. The "addon" I partially provided here:
>
> h
I just ran across this in the Wiki from David concerning Billing Accounts
from back in July.
http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBIZ/Billing+Account
The current Ofbiz implementation does not operate as described in this
document. The "addon" I partially provided here:
https://issues.
27;ve looked
into so far on this one...).
Many of those steps have a one to many relationship, for each some of them it
might make sense to call another service instead of in-lining, but that is of
course just a little detail of implementation (random thought...).
> Billing Accounts: wrong
ntApplication.amount) (for
the same payment method type) then mark the OrderPaymentPreference as received
> Billing Accounts: wrong balance if payments are applied using the standard UI
> (cause: status of OrderPaymen
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato reassigned OFBIZ-1243:
Assignee: Jacopo Cappellato
> Billing Accounts: wrong balance if payments
OrderPaymentPreference
status updated this way
> Billing Accounts: wrong balance if payments are applied using the standard UI
> (cause: status of OrderPaymentPreference is not u
a bug strictly related
to payments to billing accounts, that are working properly.
The problem is a more general issue with offline payments: if an offline
payments is received and applied to an invoice using the general purpose
"Payment" screens in the Accounting appli
Billing Accounts: wrong balance if payments are applied using the standard UI
(cause: status of OrderPaymentPreference is not updated)
--
Key
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato reassigned OFBIZ-1101:
Assignee: Jacopo Cappellato
> Missing Billing Accounts in Dropd
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato closed OFBIZ-1101.
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks Jeremy,
it looks good. Rev. 552487
> Missing Billing Accou
should test with a more standard test case to see if the sorting works
fine, but the code looks OK.
> Missing Billing Accounts in Dropdown
>
>
> Key: OFBIZ-1101
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/br
i don't have any test
case... but i guess you have so maybe you can try.
> Missing Billing Accounts in Dropdown
>
>
> Key: OFBIZ-1101
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1101
>
lException("You trampled a billing account!");
}
Unless there is a specific reason for such a behaviour, i guess it should be
fixed by using a List, implementing a Comparator, and using Collections.sort().
> Missing Billing Accounts in Dropdown
> --
and using Collections.sort().
> Missing Billing Accounts in Dropdown
>
>
> Key: OFBIZ-1101
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1101
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Bug
&g
(accountAvailable = accountLimit - accountBalance) , so if the value repeats in
more than one billing accounts, it is overwritten, and only the last one is
added to the list.
in BillingAccountWorker.java line 100:
billingAccount.put("accountBalance", new Double(accountBalance)
Missing Billing Accounts in Dropdown
Key: OFBIZ-1101
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1101
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Components: accounting
Affects Versions: SVN trunk
ssage ---
From: Jacopo Cappellato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: 3/27/07, 1:46:39 AM
Subject: Questions about Billing Accounts and new FinAccount code
David, Andy, all,
I'm really interested to the new code about FinAccounts; I don't know
much about them but I
> --- Original Message ---
> From: Jacopo Cappellato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
> Sent: 3/27/07, 1:46:39 AM
> Subject: Questions about Billing Accounts and new FinAccount code
>
> David, Andy, all,
>
> I'm really interested to t
://www.nabble.com/Questions-about-Billing-Accounts-and-new-FinAccount-code-tf3471312.html#a9749040
Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
David, Andy, all,
I'm really interested to the new code about FinAccounts; I don't know
much about them but I'd like to figure out if in some way that can be
used in place of billing accounts.
I'm asking this because in my opinion there are some issues in the way
billin
35 matches
Mail list logo