Re: Discussion: Home application (was: Pluggable preferences/profile screen)

2008-10-06 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
t (in fact, the calendar work I'm doing right now is part of that) but we need a place for it to land. -Adrian --- On Sun, 10/5/08, Bruno Busco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: Bruno Busco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Discussion: Home application (was: Pluggable preferences/pr

Re: Discussion: Home application (was: Pluggable preferences/profile screen)

2008-10-05 Thread Adrian Crum
D]> > Subject: Re: Discussion: Home application (was: Pluggable preferences/profile > screen) > To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Sunday, October 5, 2008, 11:44 AM > Adrian, > what you say sounds really great to me. > It would be nice to have your cont

Re: Discussion: Home application (was: Pluggable preferences/profile screen)

2008-10-05 Thread Bruno Busco
t we need a place for > it to land. > > -Adrian > > --- On Sun, 10/5/08, Bruno Busco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > From: Bruno Busco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Discussion: Home application (was: Pluggable preferences/profile > screen) > >

Re: Discussion: Home application (was: Pluggable preferences/profile screen)

2008-10-05 Thread Adrian Crum
t; Subject: Discussion: Home application (was: Pluggable preferences/profile > screen) > To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org > Date: Sunday, October 5, 2008, 2:05 AM > David, > I found in the ML some citations of the Apache Pluto > project that is JSR 168 > compliant. May be this is what y

Discussion: Home application (was: Pluggable preferences/profile screen)

2008-10-05 Thread Bruno Busco
David, I found in the ML some citations of the Apache Pluto project that is JSR 168 compliant. May be this is what you are referring to. It would be really nice to have the MyPage application rolled out using this kind of tecnology but I am actually too far from having a clear idea of the efforts r