Re: Discussion: Security-Aware Artifacts

2009-12-31 Thread Adrian Crum
The branch implements the design specified in this document: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBTECH/OFBiz+Security+Redesign -Adrian Bob Morley wrote: I am interested in reviewing this work. I think there may be some overlap on how we decided to apply security in our ofbiz based sy

Re: Discussion: Security-Aware Artifacts

2009-12-31 Thread Bob Morley
re adding it to the >> trunk. > > Of course! Not only do I welcome review and testing, I really NEED it. I > don't have a lot of time to work on it. My hope is, once it is basically > working, others may take an interest in it and get involved. > > -Adrian > >

Re: Discussion: Security-Aware Artifacts

2009-12-31 Thread Adrian Crum
David E Jones wrote: On Dec 30, 2009, at 4:48 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: The security-aware artifacts implementation is nearly complete. The branch is out of date and I can't get it synchronized with the trunk because there are too many conflicts. I would like to create a new branch and port the

Re: Discussion: Security-Aware Artifacts

2009-12-30 Thread David E Jones
On Dec 30, 2009, at 4:48 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: > The security-aware artifacts implementation is nearly complete. The branch is > out of date and I can't get it synchronized with the trunk because there are > too many conflicts. I would like to create a new branch and port the > security-aware

Re: Discussion: Security-Aware Artifacts

2009-12-30 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Not a problem from my POV. Thanks for your continued work on this Adrian! Jacques From: "Adrian Crum" The security-aware artifacts implementation is nearly complete. The branch is out of date and I can't get it synchronized with the trunk because there are too many conflicts. I would like to

Discussion: Security-Aware Artifacts

2009-12-30 Thread Adrian Crum
The security-aware artifacts implementation is nearly complete. The branch is out of date and I can't get it synchronized with the trunk because there are too many conflicts. I would like to create a new branch and port the security-aware artifacts implementation over to that. Any objections?

Re: Discussion: Security-Aware Artifacts

2009-05-17 Thread Adrian Crum
gt; From: Bruno Busco > Subject: Re: Discussion: Security-Aware Artifacts > To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org > Date: Saturday, May 16, 2009, 10:33 PM > Adrian, > I added a comment on the Wiki page. I forward it here... > > --- > > That's really cool! I can't

Re: Discussion: Security-Aware Artifacts

2009-05-16 Thread Bruno Busco
Adrian, I added a comment on the Wiki page. I forward it here... --- That's really cool! I can't wait to see it working! BTW I can see in the design that an artifact can define an own specific permission. May be adding a scenario like: "User X can perform the artifact Y-specific oper

Discussion: Security-Aware Artifacts

2009-05-15 Thread Adrian Crum
This is a continuation of the security refactoring discussion. There is a Wiki page that outlines the design of Security-Aware Artifacts: http://docs.ofbiz.org/x/Ch8 I started to build out the scenarios, so that we can be sure the design meets everyone's needs as expected. David - I'm not sur