.
Jacques
- Original Message -
From: sharad bhushan
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 5:16 PM
Subject: Re: FYI: ms & mx vs Xms & Xmx
Jacques,
Here are the references
1. http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/gc-tuning-6-140523.html
2.
htt
I wonder what is a trusted source information in this context :o)
It seems that Oracle (and even Sun before) is hidding a lot of information, or
they don't upate...
Refer to
http://stas-blogspot.blogspot.fr/2011/07/most-complete-list-of-xx-options-for.html
Did not find anything like that for sta
It doesn't seem a very trusted source of information.
Jacopo
On Jun 24, 2012, at 10:31 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> More than once, eg:
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5276197/is-java-heap-space-dictated-by-ram-or-hard-drive
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "Jacopo Cappellato"
>> On Jun 24, 2012,
More than once, eg:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5276197/is-java-heap-space-dictated-by-ram-or-hard-drive
Jacques
From: "Jacopo Cappellato"
On Jun 24, 2012, at 9:23 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
I read that there is "now" ms & mx standard options
Hi Jacques, could you please send a ref
On Jun 24, 2012, at 9:23 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> I read that there is "now" ms & mx standard options
Hi Jacques, could you please send a reference to the source of this information?
Thanks
Jacopo
Hi,
This is more for your information and not really a question nor worry.
Xms & Xmx are widely used and their behaviour should not change quickly, but they are non-standard options. You can list
non-standard options using java -X. Note the warning: "The -X options are non-standard and subject
