Scott,
Good questions. Please see my comments below:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:28 AM, Scott Gray wrote:
> Hi Erwan,
>
> It'll be another couple of days before I can make an informed comment, I'm
> still very much in the learning phase.
>
> One question I do have, does anybody have selenium setup
Le 15/12/2009 21:51, Scott Gray a écrit :
Well the difference here being that webtest is only using ant and java,
you don't have to have a browser installed (and customized) to run the
tests, anywhere you can run OFBiz you can run webtests. How difficult is
it to setup a regular web server to
CI is python scripts, maybe adaptable without too much work?
Jacques
From: "Scott Gray"
That sounds like a good idea to me. What would be awesome is if the
CI server could inspect the commit, determine the components/
applications affected and then only run the applicable tests. Full
tests ru
On 16/12/2009, at 10:00 AM, Nicolas Malin wrote:
Le mercredi 16 décembre 2009 à 09:36 +1300, Scott Gray a écrit :
That sounds like a good idea to me. What would be awesome is if the
CI server could inspect the commit, determine the components/
applications affected and then only run the applic
Le mercredi 16 décembre 2009 à 09:36 +1300, Scott Gray a écrit :
> That sounds like a good idea to me. What would be awesome is if the
> CI server could inspect the commit, determine the components/
> applications affected and then only run the applicable tests. Full
> tests runs could be re
On 16/12/2009, at 6:56 AM, Erwan de FERRIERES wrote:
Le 15/12/2009 11:28, Scott Gray a écrit :
I guess I'm still sitting here wondering if WebTest isn't a better
solution simply because it doesn't require a browser (just another
ant
task) and the tests run faster. I've never used either be
That sounds like a good idea to me. What would be awesome is if the
CI server could inspect the commit, determine the components/
applications affected and then only run the applicable tests. Full
tests runs could be reserved for framework commits or something like
that.
Regards
Scott
O
On 16/12/2009, at 12:01 AM, Matthieu Bollot wrote:
Le mardi 15 décembre 2009 à 23:28 +1300, Scott Gray a écrit :
Hi Erwan,
It'll be another couple of days before I can make an informed
comment,
I'm still very much in the learning phase.
One question I do have, does anybody have selenium se
Le 15/12/2009 11:28, Scott Gray a écrit :
I guess I'm still sitting here wondering if WebTest isn't a better
solution simply because it doesn't require a browser (just another ant
task) and the tests run faster. I've never used either before so I'm in
the dark on these solutions.
Webtest is e
One thing that we could easily do is put together a continuous integration that
has several branches - one that is run immediately upon each of the commits and
one that is scheduled for a few times a day for these longer running tests. I
agree that we definitely need these in place, but breakin
Le mardi 15 décembre 2009 à 23:28 +1300, Scott Gray a écrit :
> Hi Erwan,
>
> It'll be another couple of days before I can make an informed comment,
> I'm still very much in the learning phase.
>
> One question I do have, does anybody have selenium setup to run in a
> continuous integration e
Hi Erwan,
It'll be another couple of days before I can make an informed comment,
I'm still very much in the learning phase.
One question I do have, does anybody have selenium setup to run in a
continuous integration environment?
If you have lots of tests, how long to they take to run? Is
Hi all,
As many of us are now looking into seleniumXML, I would like to discuss
a bit more with you of the logging of errors and success in seleniumXml.
Has anyone started something ? The changes that have to integrate are
major and is would be great to coordinate our efforts.
What I'm thin
13 matches
Mail list logo
