@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2012 1:36 AM
Subject: Re: Lose Weight Program for OFBiz - what should go to specialpurpose
Thank you Jacques. XUL is the mozilla UI thing.
I didn't use any of the framework mentioned her :)
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Jacques Le Roux
wrote:
&
Weight Program for OFBiz - what should go to specialpurpose
If we can agree on exactly what specialpurpose will be for in future, we
might find it easy to decide what to move.
My original thought was that specialpurpose is for the "extras" that most
people won't want. But in future Apa
If we can agree on exactly what specialpurpose will be for in future, we
might find it easy to decide what to move.
My original thought was that specialpurpose is for the "extras" that most
people won't want. But in future Apache Extras will be doing that. So
should we remove specialpurpose totall
Thank you Jacques. XUL is the mozilla UI thing.
I didn't use any of the framework mentioned her :)
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Jacques Le Roux
wrote:
> From: "Mansour Al Akeel"
>>
>> Anil,
>>
>> I did not mean that putting a component under "specialpurposes" will
>> make it used more by de
From: "Mansour Al Akeel"
Anil,
I did not mean that putting a component under "specialpurposes" will
make it used more by developers.
I meant because it will be used more than other component, let's not move it.
From Jacopo's first email about the Lose Weight :
Legenda for what I propose for eac
Hi Anil,
From: "Anil Patel"
Jacques,
I don't use pos, but I think it's good idea to keep it where it's. I
think it's more likely, it will be used more than what goes in Extra.
It fits "specialpurpose".
Why do you think a component will be used more if its in specialpurpose
section, instead
Le 21/03/2012 16:16, Anil Patel a écrit :
Jacques,
I don't use pos, but I think it's good idea to keep it where it's. I
think it's more likely, it will be used more than what goes in Extra.
It fits "specialpurpose".
Why do you think a component will be used more if its in specialpurpose
sectio
Anil,
I did not mean that putting a component under "specialpurposes" will
make it used more by developers.
I meant because it will be used more than other component, let's not move it.
>From Jacopo's first email about the Lose Weight :
Legenda for what I propose for each piece of code:
* Attic: r
>
> Jacques,
> I don't use pos, but I think it's good idea to keep it where it's. I
> think it's more likely, it will be used more than what goes in Extra.
> It fits "specialpurpose".
>
Why do you think a component will be used more if its in specialpurpose
section, instead of Extras.
Persona
Anil,
I agree with you.
Jacques,
I don't use pos, but I think it's good idea to keep it where it's. I
think it's more likely, it will be used more than what goes in Extra.
It fits "specialpurpose".
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Anil Patel wrote:
> People are really worried on the idea of m
People are really worried on the idea of moving certain components from Ofbiz
trunk to Ofbiz Extras. Why is it so?
Moving a component from Ofbiz trunk to Ofbiz Extras does not mean that the
component is not good and so we are throwing it out. Instead idea is to allow
components to grow by givi
They are more generic sure, I wonder for the pos...
Jacques
From: "Mansour Al Akeel"
Jacques,
Yes. You are right. I meant projectmgr. :)
I believe assetmaint and projectmgr are used more than others and good
to keep them where they are.
Thank you.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Jacques
Jacques,
Yes. You are right. I meant projectmgr. :)
I believe assetmaint and projectmgr are used more than others and good
to keep them where they are.
Thank you.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Jacques Le Roux
wrote:
> partymgr is in application will not move, you meant ProjectMgr right?
partymgr is in application will not move, you meant ProjectMgr right?
Jacques
From: "Mansour Al Akeel"
I would recommend keeping partymgr and assetmaint.
I am not sure if accounting depends on assetmain.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
+ 1 on move of majority of apps
I would recommend keeping partymgr and assetmaint.
I am not sure if accounting depends on assetmain.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
> + 1 on move of majority of apps in specialpurpose to 'Extras', excluding
> projectmgr as it displays how to use OFBiz in a different industr
+ 1 on move of majority of apps in specialpurpose to 'Extras', excluding
projectmgr as it displays how to use OFBiz in a different industry than
ecommerce/webshop. Is it not so that OFBiz is versatile. ProjectMgr does
deliver some of that versatility.
Regards,
Pierre
Op 20 maart 2012 12:47 schre
From: "Nicolas Malin"
Agree with Jacopo, specialpurpose should be on extras.
Huho? ;o)
Scrum depend of projectmgr, the OFBiz extra will be have a dependency management to ensure that all needed components will be
present.
Good point!
To all: is crowd dependent on ldap?
Jacques
Nicolas
From: "Jacopo Cappellato"
H) specialpurpose/*: move several (if not all, apart ecommerce) of the components to "Extras" (if there are persons interested to
become committers/maintainers) or to "Attic"
There seems to be a general agreement to slim down the number of applications in this gro
Agree with Jacopo, specialpurpose should be on extras.
Scrum depend of projectmgr, the OFBiz extra will be have a dependency
management to ensure that all needed components will be present.
Nicolas
Le 20/03/2012 12:47, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
H) specialpurpose/*: move several (if not all,
>
> H) specialpurpose/*: move several (if not all, apart ecommerce) of the
> components to "Extras" (if there are persons interested to become
> committers/maintainers) or to "Attic"
>
There seems to be a general agreement to slim down the number of applications
in this group and move them to
20 matches
Mail list logo
