http://docs.ofbiz.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=4098
Jacques
From: "guo weizhan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I think it need to make the ofbiz can deploy as war package would be
great, it need to do lot's of work to deploy ofbiz in websphere,weblogic and
others J2EE server. I think it can more eas
I think it need to make the ofbiz can deploy as war package would be
great, it need to do lot's of work to deploy ofbiz in websphere,weblogic and
others J2EE server. I think it can more easy to use and more popular if
ofbiz can deploy as war package
2008/5/5 Adrian Crum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I
I was confused about that. I thought we were talking about releasing the
R4 framework.
-Adrian
David E Jones wrote:
Do you mean "branch" or "fork"?
Do a release branch, yes, as explained in the message, just like the
release4.0 branch. The intent is to create a binary distribution of just
Do you mean "branch" or "fork"?
Do a release branch, yes, as explained in the message, just like the
release4.0 branch. The intent is to create a binary distribution of
just the framework.
-David
On May 4, 2008, at 1:07 PM, BJ Freeman wrote:
from what I read it seems you will be branch
from what I read it seems you will be branching the framwork.
is this accruate?
David E Jones sent the following on 5/3/2008 10:44 AM:
>
> Could you be more specific? I don't understand the question.
>
> -David
>
>
> On May 3, 2008, at 10:17 AM, BJ Freeman wrote:
>
>> what will happen to the
Could you be more specific? I don't understand the question.
-David
On May 3, 2008, at 10:17 AM, BJ Freeman wrote:
what will happen to the effort to keep the applications working with
the
frame work?
David E Jones sent the following on 5/2/2008 1:09 PM:
Yes, exactly.
The main intent i
what will happen to the effort to keep the applications working with the
frame work?
David E Jones sent the following on 5/2/2008 1:09 PM:
>
> Yes, exactly.
>
> The main intent is to release something that is easier to test and
> release to attract end-users. Part of the point of attracting en
Yes, exactly.
The main intent is to release something that is easier to test and
release to attract end-users. Part of the point of attracting end-
users is to popularize the OFBiz framework way of doing things (a
business and service oriented application architecture as opposed to
an obj
When you're speaking of releasing the framework, is the intent to
distribute something standalone that could be downloaded / used (and
tested / maintained) separately from the business applications?
-Joe
On May 1, 2008, at 9:15 PM, David E Jones wrote:
Any other comments on this? I'd real
That would be great Adrian. I noticed you were working on the example
component, which will be part of this framework release. Actually, the
example and webtools components are the only ones that really have a
UI to them, so work in those areas would be especially great right now.
For the
Regarding the effort to get the word out, HWM will definitely enjoy
the chance to participate in that - docs, marketing, PR. Would be
great to collaborate with other individuals / organizations on any of
these as well. Any interested parties, feel free to contact me
individually and we co
I can spend some time going through the UI and make sure it's compatible
with the latest IE. I was planning on doing that anyway.
Plus, I have experience with preparing press releases.
-Adrian
David E Jones wrote:
Any other comments on this? I'd really love to get the framework shaped
up an
Any other comments on this? I'd really love to get the framework
shaped up and cleaned up as much as we plan to for the near future so
we can release something and keep it stable for a while...
Related to this, when we release the framework I really want to put
some stuff together to talk
Thanks for your comments Shi. This is great stuff, and looking forward
to working with you more and seeing the results of these efforts.
On the requirements versus implementation thing (with design in the
middle), I agree that is a huge deal. It is almost impossible to
expect a single per
+1.
David mentioned a main puzzle for OFBiz: how to lower down the
requirements on a OFBiz programmer. Currently, a qualified OFBiz
programmer must be a superman. I think split the requirements to
consultant part and programmer part may help. As we know, in large
service providers, consultants con
On Apr 29, 2008, at 11:25 PM, Bruno Busco wrote:
David,
I totally agree with your vision, the purpose of my original
proposal to use
the JIRA roadmap feature was just to have a clear understanding of
your
points 1), 2) and 3)
So that, day by day, everyone can clearly see what the community
David,
I totally agree with your vision, the purpose of my original proposal to use
the JIRA roadmap feature was just to have a clear understanding of your
points 1), 2) and 3)
So that, day by day, everyone can clearly see what the community has decided
to "clean up before we do a release", "just d
On Apr 29, 2008, at 2:54 PM, Ean Schuessler wrote:
David E Jones wrote:
This is a great tool. The problem with the tool and the approach in
general to this sort of release management is that it assumes top-
down management of a project.
In the Release Plan document it starts out by explaini
+1 :o)
Jacques
From: "Ean Schuessler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
David E Jones wrote:
This is a great tool. The problem with the tool and the approach in
general to this sort of release management is that it assumes top-down
management of a project.
In the Release Plan document it starts out by ex
David E Jones wrote:
This is a great tool. The problem with the tool and the approach in
general to this sort of release management is that it assumes top-down
management of a project.
In the Release Plan document it starts out by explaining the nature of
OFBiz and the community that drives i
Thanks Bruno,
David as well explained why OFBiz does not use such tools... yet...
Jacques
- Original Message -
From: Bruno Busco
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org ; Jacques Le Roux
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 3:58 PM
Subject: Re: Next Ofbiz release
For more information please
sion) will be of great help to the community.
Take this
as
just a suggestion from a JIRA fun ;-).
-Bruno
2008/4/10, David E Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBADMIN/Release+Plan
-David
On Apr 10, 2008, at 11:32 AM, Bruno Busco wrote:
Hi,
i would li
next release soon!
> > > BTW I think that using JIRA release management features (roadmap,
> > > change log
> > > and issue fix version) will be of great help to the community. Take
> > > this as
> > > just a suggestion from a JIRA fun ;-).
>
e fix version) will be of great help to the community. Take this
> > as
> > just a suggestion from a JIRA fun ;-).
> >
> > -Bruno
> >
> >
> > 2008/4/10, David E Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > ht
ROTECTED]>:
http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBADMIN/Release+Plan
-David
On Apr 10, 2008, at 11:32 AM, Bruno Busco wrote:
> Hi,
> i would like to ask if there is a roadmap to the next Ofbiz release (or
> release candidate).
>
> When (based on time or based on task/functionality to be imple
suggestion from a JIRA fun ;-).
-Bruno
2008/4/10, David E Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBADMIN/Release+Plan
>
> -David
>
>
> On Apr 10, 2008, at 11:32 AM, Bruno Busco wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > i would like to ask if there is a road
http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBADMIN/Release+Plan
-David
On Apr 10, 2008, at 11:32 AM, Bruno Busco wrote:
Hi,
i would like to ask if there is a roadmap to the next Ofbiz release
(or
release candidate).
When (based on time or based on task/functionality to be
implemented) is it
Hi,
i would like to ask if there is a roadmap to the next Ofbiz release (or
release candidate).
When (based on time or based on task/functionality to be implemented) is it
planned?
I do not see the JIRA roadmap feature used here but I think it would be
great.
Thanks,
- Bruno
28 matches
Mail list logo
