On Jun 15, 2009, at 1:04 PM, David E Jones wrote:
We don't really have requirements for the current applications and
security groups and permissions and such, and in fact these things
weren't created based on a certain set of requirements but instead
evolved over time.
I might be wrong
On Jun 15, 2009, at 4:39 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Jun 15, 2009, at 11:50 AM, David E Jones wrote:
If what I am proposing here makes sense, we can think about my
last proposal as an initial start toward this effort. We can
start with defining application specific security groups
On Jun 15, 2009, at 11:50 AM, David E Jones wrote:
If what I am proposing here makes sense, we can think about my
last proposal as an initial start toward this effort. We can start
with defining application specific security groups. So that if
someone has permissions only for a Order
On 15-Jun-09, at 3:20 PM, David E Jones wrote:
On Jun 15, 2009, at 3:29 AM, Mridul Pathak wrote:
Hi David,
We have documentation on OFBiz wiki where various Actors and
their roles have been defined. These are the Actors which are
meant to use OFBiz backend applications. Each Actor h
On Jun 15, 2009, at 3:29 AM, Mridul Pathak wrote:
Hi David,
We have documentation on OFBiz wiki where various Actors and
their roles have been defined. These are the Actors which are meant
to use OFBiz backend applications. Each Actor has some specific
role, and he executes a certai
+1
On Jun 15, 2009, at 11:29 AM, Mridul Pathak wrote:
Hi David,
We have documentation on OFBiz wiki where various Actors and
their roles have been defined. These are the Actors which are meant
to use OFBiz backend applications. Each Actor has some specific
role, and he executes a ce
Hi David,
We have documentation on OFBiz wiki where various Actors and
their roles have been defined. These are the Actors which are meant
to use OFBiz backend applications. Each Actor has some specific role,
and he executes a certain business process. For example, a buyer
places p
That's an interesting idea... what are you thinking about _why_ would
we want that?
-David
On Jun 15, 2009, at 2:00 AM, Mridul Pathak wrote:
I think we should have application specific security group not only
for Accounting but for all other applications. And demo data for
parties eac
I think we should have application specific security group not only
for Accounting but for all other applications. And demo data for
parties each having an application specific permissions will also be a
good thing to have.
--
Thanks,
Mridul Pathak
HotWax Media Pvt. Ltd.
http://www.hotwaxm
Anil,
Thank you for your response.
Created a jira issue - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/
OFBIZ-2606 and patch is uploaded with testing steps.
Thanks And Regards
Sumit Pandit
On Jun 15, 2009, at 9:57 AM, Anil Patel wrote:
Sumit,
Looks like good thing to do. Having this profile handy
Sumit,
Looks like good thing to do. Having this profile handy will give us
opportunity to break out of habit of using admin/ofbiz user account
for testing application.
If you have time it will be good to create a Jira issue for it and
contribute patch.
Regards
Anil Patel
On Jun 13, 2009,
Hello Devs,
I would like to propose setup of a new SecurityGroup which is
dedicated to OFBiz Accounting component only. It will assigned by all
SecurityPermission which are required to handle variuos accounting
operations. Purpose of this will be to be able to create a UserLogin,
who wil
12 matches
Mail list logo
