Thanks for the restatement - I really appreciate it.
My point was that we already have a download page for the Release Branch which
already has the button linked that you're asking for and it's found on the
Branches / Releases page right here - http://build.ofbiz.org/branches.php .
Let's le
Hi Tim:
What I meant to say is:
I'm ok with the changes you made to the OFBiz download page. Thanks.
Regards,
Ruth
Find me on the web at http://www.myofbiz.com or Google keyword "myofbiz"
ruth.hoff...@myofbiz.com
Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hi Tim:
I
Hi Tim:
I don't get your point. What is wrong with
http://build.ofbiz.org/branches.php?
FYI - I don't care so much about the feedback. I just want new users and
casual "downloaders" to have a reasonable shot at a successful download
and a first-time OFBiz experience.
Regards,
Ruth
---
Still a bad idea. Have you even seen the branches / releases page which does
exactly what you're asking? http://build.ofbiz.org/branches.php - take a peek
because then we can stop all of this around pushing people to the 9.04 release.
As I've said seemingly a million times, until the things t
Feel free to Jacques - I sent out a message with what was done on Ruth's
original request.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Dec 10, 2009, at 2:32 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Hi Ruth,
>
> Somebody knows the status of eleme
Hi Ruth,
Somebody knows the status of elements related to this the task (text writing,
place to put it, permissions needed to edit, ...)?
Maybe to easily share and get it with just quick glance we could open a Jira
(with possibly subtasks) for it ?
Thanks
Jacques
From: "Ruth Hoffman"
Hi
Hi Ryan:
We could say that. Please say that! And please, have that button point
to a 9.04 build.
Currently, that button does not point to a download of OFBiz 9.04.
Instead you get the latest trunk build. [Hence all my original confusion
and misunderstanding about what was going on.] So, yes,
Hi Jacques:
I like this suggestion.
Regards,
Ruth
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Actually we should simply state in this column
All version will run at best performance with latest java version
(currently 1.6 recommended), but
R4.0 needs java 1.4 to compile
R9.04 needs java 1.5 to compile
Trunk need
I see no reason to add "New Users" to the download button, as they are not the
only people who download OFBiz. Take a look at another Open Source project
that has 10 million downloads as an example, WordPress. I love the fact that
they display a big download button right in the middle of their
Thanks Scott,
Right, this is true for R9.04 and 1.5 also
So the text I sent after should better be
All versions will run and compile with best performance with latest java
version (currently 1.6 recommended), but
R4.0 is compatible with java 1.4
R9.04 is compatible with java 1.5
Trunk needs
It doesn't _need_ 1.4, it's just compatible with 1.4 you can also
build and run it on 1.5 or 1.6.
Regards
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On 10/12/2009, at 9:57 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Thanks Tim,
We should put a word about R4.0 which IIRW needs java 1.4 to compile
Jacque
Actually we should simply state in this column
All version will run at best performance with latest java version (currently
1.6 recommended), but
R4.0 needs java 1.4 to compile
R9.04 needs java 1.5 to compile
Trunk needs java 1.6 to compile
Jacques
() ascii ribbon campaign against HTML e-mail
Thanks Tim,
We should put a word about R4.0 which IIRW needs java 1.4 to compile
Jacques
() ascii ribbon campaign against HTML e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org
From: "Tim Ruppert"
It was here, but I forgot it was on the home page too - will be done before you
get this message:
http://build.o
Hi Tim:
Thanks
Ruth
Tim Ruppert wrote:
They will always run on 1.5, but they also run on 1.6
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Dec 9, 2009, at 7:48 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hi Tim:
OK - your call.
For my own edification
They will always run on 1.5, but they also run on 1.6
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Dec 9, 2009, at 7:48 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
> Hi Tim:
> OK - your call.
> For my own edification do all the 9.04 releases still run usin
Hi Tim:
OK - your call.
For my own edification do all the 9.04 releases still run using 1.5 or,
if not, do you know the cut-over release?
TIA
Ruth
Tim Ruppert wrote:
Java 1.6 has been out for a long time and is being updated automatically by
many OS so I think we're likely good as we go. T
Java 1.6 has been out for a long time and is being updated automatically by
many OS so I think we're likely good as we go. Thanks for the help.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Dec 9, 2009, at 7:34 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hi Tim:
Thanks again.
This all is really great.
As I look at the "What Do I Get" column, I'm thinking that this should
stay as is. It is clear and concise and applies to all the various
downloads. It is easy to find and read.
Maybe you could add, next to the "install java SDK version 1.6",
so
It was here, but I forgot it was on the home page too - will be done before you
get this message:
http://build.ofbiz.org/branches.php
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Dec 9, 2009, at 6:27 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
> Hi Tim:
Hi Tim:
Well, you can't blame a girl for asking :-)
I'll look at the "What Do You Get" stuff next. Also, I just looked at
the changes and I think you said #6 was done (below) but I don't see it
on the page.
Thanks for doing this.
Ruth
Tim Ruppert wrote:
Ruth, first of all, thanks for taking t
Ruth, first of all, thanks for taking the time out of your busy day to do this,
but I fear that we need to call a "Time Out" and recalibrate the direction you
went with your offering. There are a bunch of changes here around an agenda
that I've repeatedly mentioned does not seem to be inline wi
Hi Tim et al:
First, I'm not sure I know what the difference is between the column
labeled "Nightly Trunk Builds" and the one labeled "Archived Trunk
Builds". Why both?
OK, but not to get hung up on that...here's my first go-round at
suggested changes:
For starters, how about something lik
22 matches
Mail list logo
