Jonathon -- Improov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2007 7:58 PM
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r597479 -
/ofbiz/trunk/applications/party/entitydef/entitymodel.xml
> I still maintain that there is no such thing as too much documentation
> (unless it&#x
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2007 3:40 AM
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r597479 -
/ofbiz/trunk/applications/party/entitydef/entitymodel.xml
Skip,
Well, not yet. About 10 months ago, I proudly voiced an ambition to create
enough documentation to
rapidly train a
team implementation is happening
> now in many instances with some of the members not having a full grasp of
> the business or database aspects.
>
> Skip
>
> -Original Message-
> From: David E Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 2
On Nov 23, 2007, at 4:40 AM, Jonathon -- Improov wrote:
Here, please pardon my terminology again, I don't know how else to
say this. (This has irritated David before). There are 2 parts to
OFBiz. The framework, and the ERP aspects. The framework is huge,
but is really tiny compared to the
a full grasp of
the business or database aspects.
Skip
-Original Message-
From: David E Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2007 11:47 PM
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r597479 -
/ofbiz/trunk/applications/party/entitydef/entitymodel.xml
I hope I don&
-Original Message-
From: David E Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2007 11:47 PM
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r597479 -
/ofbiz/trunk/applications/party/entitydef/entitymodel.xml
I hope I don't burst any bubbles... but this specific paragraph
I hope I don't burst any bubbles... but this specific paragraph has a
couple of real doosies (IMO of course):
On Nov 22, 2007, at 10:23 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was also trying to point out that "obvious" is always relative to
experience and education.
To some extend, yes, but I th
, November 22, 2007 8:51 PM
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r597479 -
/ofbiz/trunk/applications/party/entitydef/entitymodel.xml
Yeah, the additional documentation adds "zero" to the documentation value.
For eg, field "contactMechTypeId" is described as "C
a good thing.
>>
>> Second, what might be "obvious" for one might be horribly complex for
>> someone else.
>>
>> I vote to have more documentation, especially in that it cannot hurt.
>>
>> Skip
>>
>> -Original Message-
>>
entation, especially in that it cannot hurt.
Skip
-Original Message-
From: David E Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2007 2:00 PM
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: svn commit: r597479 -
/ofbiz/trunk/applications/party/entitydef/entitymod
10 matches
Mail list logo
