i-instances model.
> That makes sense but I'm not sure if the project wants to go that far.
>
> Thanks for answering and sharing your ideas
>
> Cheers
>
> Jacques
> >
> > Kind Regards,
> >
> > Shi Jinghai
> >
> >
> >
> > -邮件原件--
Jinghai
-邮件原件-
发件人: Jacques Le Roux [mailto:jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com]
发送时间: 2018年9月2日 16:13
收件人: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
主题: Re: Should we keep the multi-tenants feature in OFBiz?
Hi Jinghai,
Inline...
Le 29/08/2018 à 14:49, Shi Jinghai a écrit :
Hi Jacques,
Honestly I was shocked by thi
Hi All,
Blockfrieght, Inc. has a alpha (work in progress) Kubernetes wrapper /
production deployment repository (work in progress) published here:
https://github.com/blockfreight/ofbiz-erp
Feedback / Advice and Bug-Reports welcome (as is suggestions of how to make
the example more canonical and
if we have the same target.
Kind Regards,
Shi Jinghai
-邮件原件-
发件人: Jacques Le Roux [mailto:jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com]
发送时间: 2018年9月2日 16:13
收件人: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
主题: Re: Should we keep the multi-tenants feature in OFBiz?
Hi Jinghai,
Inline...
Le 29/08/2018 à 14:49, Shi Jinghai
原件-
发件人: Jacques Le Roux [mailto:jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
<mailto:jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com>]
发送时间: 2018年8月29日 17:46
收件人: dev@ofbiz.apache.org <mailto:dev@ofbiz.apache.org>
主题: Should we keep the multi-tenants feature in OFBiz?
Hi,
The multi-tenants fe
eep it. Are you using it as is?
They are also people who would be glad to get rid of.
Let's see...
Jacques
Kind Regards,
Shi Jinghai
-邮件原件-
发件人: Jacques Le Roux [mailto:jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com]
发送时间: 2018年8月29日 17:46
收件人: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
主题: Should we keep the multi-tena
implements, add a SAAS implement would be OK.
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Shi Jinghai
>
>
> -邮件原件-
> 发件人: Jacques Le Roux [mailto:jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com]
> 发送时间: 2018年8月29日 17:46
> 收件人: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
> 主题: Should we keep the multi-tenants feature in
ants implements,
add a SAAS implement would be OK.
Kind Regards,
Shi Jinghai
-邮件原件-
发件人: Jacques Le Roux [mailto:jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com]
发送时间: 2018年8月29日 17:46
收件人: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
主题: Should we keep the multi-tenants feature in OFBiz?
Hi,
The multi-tenants feature in OFBi
+1 Taher for checking the dependencies of OFBiz users on tenant feature.
As both the options create multiple numbers of databases. Before
deprecating/removing multi-tenancy, we should check all the pros and cons
of the Multi-instance option as an alternate in OFBiz.
We will not want to add another
Le 29/08/2018 à 12:05, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit :
If some project decides to drop multi-tenancy I don't
think we should be influenced or automatically follow suit. So naming
who-did-what might not important for this discussion and we need to
bake our own bread.
I was not influenced by David's dec
Before we deprecate this feature (if ever) we should provide a well
designed, fully tested and established alternative as well as a
migration path and good documentation.
I propose to do any work on this in another branch to prevent any
distraction in trunk until this change is fully establish
Yes you are right, I'll start a discussion on user ML.
I already know that Pierre Smits uses it for his own projects, and indeed we
know there are more people using it.
This said it should not prevent us to deprecate it and users to continue to use
it based on R17 branch.
They could then swit
Multi-tenancy complicates things, and the code could be made simpler
by removing it in many areas of the system. So technically, I'm for
that.
However, the issue here is whether enough people depend on it. I saw
multiple questions in the mailing list in the past about multi-tenancy
in the past, so
Hi,
The multi-tenants feature in OFBiz only allows a dozens or maybe even few
hundreds tenants, after it begin to be a lot of DBs!
I faced that with a startup which wanted to handle thousands, if not millions
(actually they failed), of tenants, obviously OFBiz can't do that.
I don't break any
14 matches
Mail list logo
