Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Is JGit reliable (BTW I work mostly on Windows...) ?
Its apparently reliable enough to serve as the basis for Eclipse GIT
support. I haven't used it in production.
--
Ean Schuessler, CTO
e...@brainfood.com
214-720-0700 x 315
Brainfood, Inc.
http://www.brainfood.com
I will also try TortoiseGIt and integration in MS File explorer
Jacques
From: "Jacques Le Roux"
Is JGit reliable (BTW I work mostly on Windows...) ?
Thanks
Jacques
From: "Ean Schuessler"
Raul Sieberath wrote:
So, there are Git plug-ins for eclipse. They can use the git
executables and sc
Is JGit reliable (BTW I work mostly on Windows...) ?
Thanks
Jacques
From: "Ean Schuessler"
Raul Sieberath wrote:
So, there are Git plug-ins for eclipse. They can use the git
executables and scripts or it can implement in java.
Which is very interesting, actually. JGit is an implementation
That is a fantastic idea - I guess it'd be super easy to scale the
datastore then right?
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Oct 24, 2009, at 1:35 PM, Ean Schuessler wrote:
Raul Sieberath wrote:
So, there are Git plug-ins for eclipse. They can use the git
executables and scripts or it can implement in java.
Raul Sieberath wrote:
So, there are Git plug-ins for eclipse. They can use the git
executables and scripts or it can implement in java.
Which is very interesting, actually. JGit is an implementation of GIT in
Java under the BSD license. I've been interested for some time in
turning this into
Pierre,
actually git does not have a server installation. It does not have
server daemon, and it is not necessary.
Git in a collection of programs and scripts. They implemented in c what
need to me fast and the rest is perl or python. I do not remember right
now.
Anyway, to understand the reason
Hi Raul,
So if I understand your posting correctly you use a git-server in your own
development environment and perhaps a plugin in eclipse?
Regards,
Pierre
2009/10/23 Raul Sieberath
> Jacques,
>
> 1 - Everyone has the whole history of development, what also is good
> for backup.
> 2 - It is d
Thanks Raul,
It helped me to understand the process, and yes this seems like an interesting
process indeed
Jacques
From: "Raul Sieberath"
Jacques,
1 - Everyone has the whole history of development, what also is good
for backup.
2 - It is distributed.
This means there is no central reposito
I really was trying not to say anything here, first because I do not
wish to add any fuel to the fire, and secondly because this
conversation did not personally concern me. However, I fail see any
circumstance when a personal conversation is "very much bad form".
Isn't the opposite genera
Tim Ruppert wrote:
> Just so everyone is on the up and up, Hans and I are offline reconciling
> _both_ "attacks" and will figure a way forward. Thanks for the help and
> the concern.
Offline? Why? This incident occurred in public, so should be
resolved in public. Private emails, private phone
Thanks Raul - I have to admit that I like it and am happy to give it a
+1 from over here.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Oct 22, 2009, at 4:05 PM, Raul Sieberath wrote:
Jacques,
1 - Everyone has the whole history of development, what also is good
for backup.
2 - It is distributed.
This means there is
Jacques,
1 - Everyone has the whole history of development, what also is good
for backup.
2 - It is distributed.
This means there is no central repository. No central
repository means that we do not need commiters as we need with SVN.
However, the community still have the people they trust.
On Oct 22, 2009, at 3:26 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Tim Ruppert wrote:
That's a pretty interesting option and I'm sure one that you've put
forward many times by now. Is this something that can be supported
by
the ASF infrastructure or is that something we'd have to provide / do
differently on t
Tim Ruppert wrote:
> Just so everyone is on the up and up, Hans and I are offline reconciling
> _both_ "attacks" and will figure a way forward. Thanks for the help and
> the concern.
That's just it, I only saw one attack. :|
Well, there's the apology you requested Adam: 'reconciling _both_
"attacks"'
-David
On Oct 22, 2009, at 3:25 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote:
Just so everyone is on the up and up, Hans and I are offline
reconciling _both_ "attacks" and will figure a way forward. Thanks
for the help and the conc
Tim Ruppert wrote:
> That's a pretty interesting option and I'm sure one that you've put
> forward many times by now. Is this something that can be supported by
> the ASF infrastructure or is that something we'd have to provide / do
> differently on top of the existing workflow to put into place?
Just so everyone is on the up and up, Hans and I are offline
reconciling _both_ "attacks" and will figure a way forward. Thanks
for the help and the concern.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Oct 22, 2009, at 3:19 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
David E Jones wrote:
I am saddened by the tone of some recent messa
David E Jones wrote:
> I am saddened by the tone of some recent messages to you from Tim and
> certain others at Hotwax, and I'm glad you are stepping up and
> responding well and being a peacemaker to help hold together the
> community that drives this project.
I would almost go so far as to say
GIT is really a very good tool. I use it locally and for other
projects. However, it does change the work flow of development.
My 2 cents
Raul
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 01:14:57 -0500
Ean Schuessler wrote:
> Adrian Crum wrote:
> > I share some of the frustration Tim expressed, but at the same time
>
Thanks for comment Raul,
How does it change the workflow, what does it changes ? Could you elaborate a
bit more please ?
I have read on Apache MLs that some persons are against using Git because, they
say, it's not good for collaboration.
Their arguments is to say that, contrary as Subversion g
On Oct 22, 2009, at 11:49 AM, Raul Sieberath wrote:
GIT is really a very good tool. I use it locally and for other
projects. However, it does change the work flow of development.
My 2 cents
Raul
I agree - we use GIT internally for everything except OFBiz.
Also, I would add a preemptive +1
GIT is really a very good tool. I use it locally and for other
projects. However, it does change the work flow of development.
My 2 cents
Raul
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 01:14:57 -0500
Ean Schuessler wrote:
> Adrian Crum wrote:
> > I share some of the frustration Tim expressed, but at the same time
>
Tim Ruppert wrote:
That's a pretty interesting option and I'm sure one that you've put
forward many times by now. Is this something that can be supported by
the ASF infrastructure or is that something we'd have to provide / do
differently on top of the existing workflow to put into place? I h
That's a pretty interesting option and I'm sure one that you've put
forward many times by now. Is this something that can be supported by
the ASF infrastructure or is that something we'd have to provide / do
differently on top of the existing workflow to put into place? I have
to admit to
Well played sir.
Hans Bakker wrote:
Let me first say that i appreciate the things you and your people have
done to OFbiz but is that a reason to write such a flame message? Yes i
know you contributed a lot similar to what we (I and my people) have
done.
However it sure looks like we have a diff
Adrian Crum wrote:
I share some of the frustration Tim expressed, but at the same time I really
appreciate the valuable contributions your company has made to the project.
All I would ask is that you spend a little more time reviewing code and testing
it before committing it.
Which brings u
valuable contributions your company has made
to the project.
All I would ask is that you spend a little more time reviewing code
and testing it before committing it.
-Adrian
--- On Wed, 10/21/09, Hans Bakker
wrote:
From: Hans Bakker
Subject: Working together. was: plans are nice, but
, Hans Bakker wrote:
> From: Hans Bakker
> Subject: Working together. was: plans are nice, but what then?
> To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
> Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009, 6:14 PM
> Tim,
>
> Let me first say that i appreciate the things you and your
> people have
>
Hi Al,
It is probably easiest if you just review the commits that have
received comments: http://markmail.org/search/list:org%2Eapache%2Eofbiz%2Edev+subject
:"svn+commit:"+order:date-backward
Regards
Scott
On 22/10/2009, at 3:53 PM, Al Byers wrote:
Tim,
What are the most common bad pract
Tim,
What are the most common bad practices that you see? It would help to
know some specifics.
-Al
Looking forward to working this out as a community Hans. I'll do this
for you -anything that you want me or my people to go back and look at
because it doesn't follow the best practices of the project, I will
fully endorse and will ensure get fixed. Please do the same on your
end - and wh
Hans,
Thank you for a mature and polite response to an immature and impolite
message from Tim.
I am saddened by the tone of some recent messages to you from Tim and
certain others at Hotwax, and I'm glad you are stepping up and
responding well and being a peacemaker to help hold together
Tim,
Let me first say that i appreciate the things you and your people have
done to OFbiz but is that a reason to write such a flame message? Yes i
know you contributed a lot similar to what we (I and my people) have
done.
However it sure looks like we have a different focus supporting OFBiz, I
a
33 matches
Mail list logo
